Cargando…
Does dissemination extend beyond publication: a survey of a cross section of public funded research in the UK
BACKGROUND: In the UK, most funding bodies now expect a commitment or effort on the part of grant holders to disseminate the findings of their research. The emphasis is on ensuring that publicly funded research is made available, can be used to support decision making, and ultimately improve the qua...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2922079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20682083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-61 |
_version_ | 1782185411544612864 |
---|---|
author | Wilson, Paul M Petticrew, Mark Calnan, Michael W Nazareth, Irwin |
author_facet | Wilson, Paul M Petticrew, Mark Calnan, Michael W Nazareth, Irwin |
author_sort | Wilson, Paul M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the UK, most funding bodies now expect a commitment or effort on the part of grant holders to disseminate the findings of their research. The emphasis is on ensuring that publicly funded research is made available, can be used to support decision making, and ultimately improve the quality and delivery of healthcare provided. In this study, we aimed to describe the dissemination practices and impacts of applied and public health researchers working across the UK. METHODS: We conducted a survey of 485 UK-based principal investigators of publicly funded applied and public health research. Participants were contacted by email and invited to complete an online questionnaire via an embedded URL. Gift vouchers were given to all participants who completed the questionnaire. Four reminder emails were sent out to non-respondents at one, two, three, and four weeks; a fifth postal reminder was also undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 243/485 (50%) questionnaires were returned (232 completed, 11 declining to participate). Most researchers recognise the importance of and appear committed to research dissemination. However, most dissemination activity beyond the publishing of academic papers appears to be undertaken an ad hoc fashion. There is some evidence that access to dissemination advice and support may facilitate more policy interactions; though access to such resources is lacking at an institutional level, and advice from funders can be variable. Although a minority of respondents routinely record details about the impact of their research, when asked about impact in relation to specific research projects most were able to provide simple narrative descriptions. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers recognise the importance of and appear committed to disseminating the findings of their work. Although researchers are focussed on academic publication, a range of dissemination activities are being applied albeit in an ad hoc fashion. However, what constitutes effective dissemination (in terms of impact and return on investment) remains unclear. Researchers need greater and clearer guidance on how best to plan, resource, and facilitate their dissemination activities. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2922079 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29220792010-08-17 Does dissemination extend beyond publication: a survey of a cross section of public funded research in the UK Wilson, Paul M Petticrew, Mark Calnan, Michael W Nazareth, Irwin Implement Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: In the UK, most funding bodies now expect a commitment or effort on the part of grant holders to disseminate the findings of their research. The emphasis is on ensuring that publicly funded research is made available, can be used to support decision making, and ultimately improve the quality and delivery of healthcare provided. In this study, we aimed to describe the dissemination practices and impacts of applied and public health researchers working across the UK. METHODS: We conducted a survey of 485 UK-based principal investigators of publicly funded applied and public health research. Participants were contacted by email and invited to complete an online questionnaire via an embedded URL. Gift vouchers were given to all participants who completed the questionnaire. Four reminder emails were sent out to non-respondents at one, two, three, and four weeks; a fifth postal reminder was also undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 243/485 (50%) questionnaires were returned (232 completed, 11 declining to participate). Most researchers recognise the importance of and appear committed to research dissemination. However, most dissemination activity beyond the publishing of academic papers appears to be undertaken an ad hoc fashion. There is some evidence that access to dissemination advice and support may facilitate more policy interactions; though access to such resources is lacking at an institutional level, and advice from funders can be variable. Although a minority of respondents routinely record details about the impact of their research, when asked about impact in relation to specific research projects most were able to provide simple narrative descriptions. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers recognise the importance of and appear committed to disseminating the findings of their work. Although researchers are focussed on academic publication, a range of dissemination activities are being applied albeit in an ad hoc fashion. However, what constitutes effective dissemination (in terms of impact and return on investment) remains unclear. Researchers need greater and clearer guidance on how best to plan, resource, and facilitate their dissemination activities. BioMed Central 2010-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2922079/ /pubmed/20682083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-61 Text en Copyright ©2010 Wilson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wilson, Paul M Petticrew, Mark Calnan, Michael W Nazareth, Irwin Does dissemination extend beyond publication: a survey of a cross section of public funded research in the UK |
title | Does dissemination extend beyond publication: a survey of a cross section of public funded research in the UK |
title_full | Does dissemination extend beyond publication: a survey of a cross section of public funded research in the UK |
title_fullStr | Does dissemination extend beyond publication: a survey of a cross section of public funded research in the UK |
title_full_unstemmed | Does dissemination extend beyond publication: a survey of a cross section of public funded research in the UK |
title_short | Does dissemination extend beyond publication: a survey of a cross section of public funded research in the UK |
title_sort | does dissemination extend beyond publication: a survey of a cross section of public funded research in the uk |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2922079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20682083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-61 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsonpaulm doesdisseminationextendbeyondpublicationasurveyofacrosssectionofpublicfundedresearchintheuk AT petticrewmark doesdisseminationextendbeyondpublicationasurveyofacrosssectionofpublicfundedresearchintheuk AT calnanmichaelw doesdisseminationextendbeyondpublicationasurveyofacrosssectionofpublicfundedresearchintheuk AT nazarethirwin doesdisseminationextendbeyondpublicationasurveyofacrosssectionofpublicfundedresearchintheuk |