Cargando…

Minimal important differences and response shift in health-related quality of life; a longitudinal study in patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that changes of 6-17 percent in the EORTC QLQ-C30 scores are regarded important by patients with multiple myeloma and thus may be considered as Minimal Important Differences (MIDs). However, patients' internal standard of measurement may have changed over time...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kvam, Ann K, Wisløff, Finn, Fayers, Peter M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2922103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20678240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-79
_version_ 1782185417290809344
author Kvam, Ann K
Wisløff, Finn
Fayers, Peter M
author_facet Kvam, Ann K
Wisløff, Finn
Fayers, Peter M
author_sort Kvam, Ann K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We previously reported that changes of 6-17 percent in the EORTC QLQ-C30 scores are regarded important by patients with multiple myeloma and thus may be considered as Minimal Important Differences (MIDs). However, patients' internal standard of measurement may have changed over time (response shift, RS). In the present work, we evaluated whether myeloma patients experience RS and if this could affect the MID-estimates. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2008, 239 patients with multiple myeloma completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline (T1) and after three months (T2). At T2, patients were asked if they had noticed any change in the domains pain, fatigue, physical function and global quality of life. They were also asked to give a retrospective judgment of their baseline values on all the four domains. RESULTS: We found clear evidence of RS in myeloma patients. However, there were differences in both magnitude and direction between patients who stated that they improved and those who deteriorated. Deteriorating patients retrospectively reported better health-related quality of life at T1 for the domains pain, fatigue and physical function. In these patients, MIDs adjusted for RS were observed to increase up to 12 percentage points. In contrast, for patients stating that they improved, we only found evidence of statistically significant RS in the domain global quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: MIDs estimated from pre-test/post-test data appeared to be robust against RS in patients reporting improvement over 3-months. This could indicate that RS has a minimal impact on the results in patients who respond to treatment, and that RS may not have an important impact on interpretation of changes reported in clinical trials where an improvement occurs. Although the effect sizes of the RSs were small, RS in deteriorating patients may have an important impact on the interpretation of changes reported in clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT00290095.
format Text
id pubmed-2922103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29221032010-08-17 Minimal important differences and response shift in health-related quality of life; a longitudinal study in patients with multiple myeloma Kvam, Ann K Wisløff, Finn Fayers, Peter M Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: We previously reported that changes of 6-17 percent in the EORTC QLQ-C30 scores are regarded important by patients with multiple myeloma and thus may be considered as Minimal Important Differences (MIDs). However, patients' internal standard of measurement may have changed over time (response shift, RS). In the present work, we evaluated whether myeloma patients experience RS and if this could affect the MID-estimates. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2008, 239 patients with multiple myeloma completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline (T1) and after three months (T2). At T2, patients were asked if they had noticed any change in the domains pain, fatigue, physical function and global quality of life. They were also asked to give a retrospective judgment of their baseline values on all the four domains. RESULTS: We found clear evidence of RS in myeloma patients. However, there were differences in both magnitude and direction between patients who stated that they improved and those who deteriorated. Deteriorating patients retrospectively reported better health-related quality of life at T1 for the domains pain, fatigue and physical function. In these patients, MIDs adjusted for RS were observed to increase up to 12 percentage points. In contrast, for patients stating that they improved, we only found evidence of statistically significant RS in the domain global quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: MIDs estimated from pre-test/post-test data appeared to be robust against RS in patients reporting improvement over 3-months. This could indicate that RS has a minimal impact on the results in patients who respond to treatment, and that RS may not have an important impact on interpretation of changes reported in clinical trials where an improvement occurs. Although the effect sizes of the RSs were small, RS in deteriorating patients may have an important impact on the interpretation of changes reported in clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT00290095. BioMed Central 2010-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2922103/ /pubmed/20678240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-79 Text en Copyright ©2010 Kvam et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kvam, Ann K
Wisløff, Finn
Fayers, Peter M
Minimal important differences and response shift in health-related quality of life; a longitudinal study in patients with multiple myeloma
title Minimal important differences and response shift in health-related quality of life; a longitudinal study in patients with multiple myeloma
title_full Minimal important differences and response shift in health-related quality of life; a longitudinal study in patients with multiple myeloma
title_fullStr Minimal important differences and response shift in health-related quality of life; a longitudinal study in patients with multiple myeloma
title_full_unstemmed Minimal important differences and response shift in health-related quality of life; a longitudinal study in patients with multiple myeloma
title_short Minimal important differences and response shift in health-related quality of life; a longitudinal study in patients with multiple myeloma
title_sort minimal important differences and response shift in health-related quality of life; a longitudinal study in patients with multiple myeloma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2922103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20678240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-79
work_keys_str_mv AT kvamannk minimalimportantdifferencesandresponseshiftinhealthrelatedqualityoflifealongitudinalstudyinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT wisløfffinn minimalimportantdifferencesandresponseshiftinhealthrelatedqualityoflifealongitudinalstudyinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT fayerspeterm minimalimportantdifferencesandresponseshiftinhealthrelatedqualityoflifealongitudinalstudyinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma