Cargando…

Management of high-risk popliteal vascular blunt trauma: clinical experience with 62 cases

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to report the clinical and functional outcomes of patients, treated between 2004 and 2009, with high-risk popliteal vascular injuries due to compound fractures about the knee. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of prospectively collecte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pourzand, Ali, Fakhri, Bassir A, Azhough, Ramin, Hassanzadeh, Mohammad Ali, Hashemzadeh, Shahryar, Bayat, Amrollah M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2922322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20730017
_version_ 1782185431486431232
author Pourzand, Ali
Fakhri, Bassir A
Azhough, Ramin
Hassanzadeh, Mohammad Ali
Hashemzadeh, Shahryar
Bayat, Amrollah M
author_facet Pourzand, Ali
Fakhri, Bassir A
Azhough, Ramin
Hassanzadeh, Mohammad Ali
Hashemzadeh, Shahryar
Bayat, Amrollah M
author_sort Pourzand, Ali
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to report the clinical and functional outcomes of patients, treated between 2004 and 2009, with high-risk popliteal vascular injuries due to compound fractures about the knee. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of prospectively collected data from Tabriz Medical Trauma Center. Our aim was to perform surgical revascularization as soon as the arterial injury was recognized. The mechanism of injury was blunt in the entire cohort of patients, and all of them had bone fractures about the knee. The treatment of arterial injury included vein graft interposition in 39 (63%), primary anastomosis in 20 (32.3%), and lateral repair in 3 (4.8%) patients. The patients were divided into 2 study groups: limb salvage group (group 1) and amputation group (group 2). Subgroup analysis consisted of univariate analysis comparing the 2 groups and multivariate analysis examining the factors associated negatively and positively with the primary endpoint, limb salvage. RESULTS: In the entire cohort of patients, 60 patients (97%) were male and 2 were female (3%); the mean age was 34.1 years (16–49 years). The overall amputation rate in this study was 37.1% (23 amputations). Significant (P < 0.05) independent factors associated negatively with limb salvage were combined tibia and fibula fracture, concomitant artery and vein injury, ligation of venous injury, and lack of backflow after Fogarty catheter thrombectomy, while repair of popliteal artery and vein injury, when present, was associated with improved early limb salvage. For 40 patients, we adopt a liberal attitude toward open 4-compartment fasciotomy through both medially and laterally placed incisions. CONCLUSION: Expeditious recognition of vascular injury, transport to repair, and repair of associated venous injury when possible are necessary to optimize limb salvage. The importance of a high level of suspicion and low threshold for timely amputation has been emphasized when limb salvage was deemed impossible to prevent life-threatening complication. Delays in surgery, extensive soft tissue defect, compound tibia–fibula fracture, and other factors are associated with high amputation rate following popliteal artery injury.
format Text
id pubmed-2922322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29223222010-08-20 Management of high-risk popliteal vascular blunt trauma: clinical experience with 62 cases Pourzand, Ali Fakhri, Bassir A Azhough, Ramin Hassanzadeh, Mohammad Ali Hashemzadeh, Shahryar Bayat, Amrollah M Vasc Health Risk Manag Case Series PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to report the clinical and functional outcomes of patients, treated between 2004 and 2009, with high-risk popliteal vascular injuries due to compound fractures about the knee. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of prospectively collected data from Tabriz Medical Trauma Center. Our aim was to perform surgical revascularization as soon as the arterial injury was recognized. The mechanism of injury was blunt in the entire cohort of patients, and all of them had bone fractures about the knee. The treatment of arterial injury included vein graft interposition in 39 (63%), primary anastomosis in 20 (32.3%), and lateral repair in 3 (4.8%) patients. The patients were divided into 2 study groups: limb salvage group (group 1) and amputation group (group 2). Subgroup analysis consisted of univariate analysis comparing the 2 groups and multivariate analysis examining the factors associated negatively and positively with the primary endpoint, limb salvage. RESULTS: In the entire cohort of patients, 60 patients (97%) were male and 2 were female (3%); the mean age was 34.1 years (16–49 years). The overall amputation rate in this study was 37.1% (23 amputations). Significant (P < 0.05) independent factors associated negatively with limb salvage were combined tibia and fibula fracture, concomitant artery and vein injury, ligation of venous injury, and lack of backflow after Fogarty catheter thrombectomy, while repair of popliteal artery and vein injury, when present, was associated with improved early limb salvage. For 40 patients, we adopt a liberal attitude toward open 4-compartment fasciotomy through both medially and laterally placed incisions. CONCLUSION: Expeditious recognition of vascular injury, transport to repair, and repair of associated venous injury when possible are necessary to optimize limb salvage. The importance of a high level of suspicion and low threshold for timely amputation has been emphasized when limb salvage was deemed impossible to prevent life-threatening complication. Delays in surgery, extensive soft tissue defect, compound tibia–fibula fracture, and other factors are associated with high amputation rate following popliteal artery injury. Dove Medical Press 2010 2010-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2922322/ /pubmed/20730017 Text en © 2010 Pourzand et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Series
Pourzand, Ali
Fakhri, Bassir A
Azhough, Ramin
Hassanzadeh, Mohammad Ali
Hashemzadeh, Shahryar
Bayat, Amrollah M
Management of high-risk popliteal vascular blunt trauma: clinical experience with 62 cases
title Management of high-risk popliteal vascular blunt trauma: clinical experience with 62 cases
title_full Management of high-risk popliteal vascular blunt trauma: clinical experience with 62 cases
title_fullStr Management of high-risk popliteal vascular blunt trauma: clinical experience with 62 cases
title_full_unstemmed Management of high-risk popliteal vascular blunt trauma: clinical experience with 62 cases
title_short Management of high-risk popliteal vascular blunt trauma: clinical experience with 62 cases
title_sort management of high-risk popliteal vascular blunt trauma: clinical experience with 62 cases
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2922322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20730017
work_keys_str_mv AT pourzandali managementofhighriskpoplitealvascularblunttraumaclinicalexperiencewith62cases
AT fakhribassira managementofhighriskpoplitealvascularblunttraumaclinicalexperiencewith62cases
AT azhoughramin managementofhighriskpoplitealvascularblunttraumaclinicalexperiencewith62cases
AT hassanzadehmohammadali managementofhighriskpoplitealvascularblunttraumaclinicalexperiencewith62cases
AT hashemzadehshahryar managementofhighriskpoplitealvascularblunttraumaclinicalexperiencewith62cases
AT bayatamrollahm managementofhighriskpoplitealvascularblunttraumaclinicalexperiencewith62cases