Cargando…

International migration and adverse birth outcomes: role of ethnicity, region of origin and destination

BACKGROUND: The literature on international migration and birth outcomes shows mixed results. This study examined whether low birth weight (LBW) and preterm birth differed between non-migrants and migrant subgroups, defined by race/ethnicity and world region of origin and destination. METHODS: A sys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Urquia, Marcelo Luis, Glazier, Richard Henry, Blondel, Beatrice, Zeitlin, Jennifer, Gissler, Mika, Macfarlane, Alison, Ng, Edward, Heaman, Maureen, Stray-Pedersen, Babill, Gagnon, Anita J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2922721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19692737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2008.083535
_version_ 1782185454248919040
author Urquia, Marcelo Luis
Glazier, Richard Henry
Blondel, Beatrice
Zeitlin, Jennifer
Gissler, Mika
Macfarlane, Alison
Ng, Edward
Heaman, Maureen
Stray-Pedersen, Babill
Gagnon, Anita J
author_facet Urquia, Marcelo Luis
Glazier, Richard Henry
Blondel, Beatrice
Zeitlin, Jennifer
Gissler, Mika
Macfarlane, Alison
Ng, Edward
Heaman, Maureen
Stray-Pedersen, Babill
Gagnon, Anita J
author_sort Urquia, Marcelo Luis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The literature on international migration and birth outcomes shows mixed results. This study examined whether low birth weight (LBW) and preterm birth differed between non-migrants and migrant subgroups, defined by race/ethnicity and world region of origin and destination. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-regression analyses were conducted using three-level logistic models to account for the heterogeneity between studies and between subgroups within studies. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies, involving more than 30 million singleton births, met the inclusion criteria. Compared with US-born black women, black migrant women were at lower odds of delivering LBW and preterm birth babies. Hispanic migrants also exhibited lower odds for these outcomes, but Asian and white migrants did not. Sub-Saharan African and Latin-American and Caribbean women were at higher odds of delivering LBW babies in Europe but not in the USA and south-central Asians were at higher odds in both continents, compared with the native-born populations. CONCLUSIONS: The association between migration and adverse birth outcomes varies by migrant subgroup and it is sensitive to the definition of the migrant and reference groups.
format Text
id pubmed-2922721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29227212010-08-17 International migration and adverse birth outcomes: role of ethnicity, region of origin and destination Urquia, Marcelo Luis Glazier, Richard Henry Blondel, Beatrice Zeitlin, Jennifer Gissler, Mika Macfarlane, Alison Ng, Edward Heaman, Maureen Stray-Pedersen, Babill Gagnon, Anita J J Epidemiol Community Health Research Report BACKGROUND: The literature on international migration and birth outcomes shows mixed results. This study examined whether low birth weight (LBW) and preterm birth differed between non-migrants and migrant subgroups, defined by race/ethnicity and world region of origin and destination. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-regression analyses were conducted using three-level logistic models to account for the heterogeneity between studies and between subgroups within studies. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies, involving more than 30 million singleton births, met the inclusion criteria. Compared with US-born black women, black migrant women were at lower odds of delivering LBW and preterm birth babies. Hispanic migrants also exhibited lower odds for these outcomes, but Asian and white migrants did not. Sub-Saharan African and Latin-American and Caribbean women were at higher odds of delivering LBW babies in Europe but not in the USA and south-central Asians were at higher odds in both continents, compared with the native-born populations. CONCLUSIONS: The association between migration and adverse birth outcomes varies by migrant subgroup and it is sensitive to the definition of the migrant and reference groups. BMJ Group 2010-03-04 2010-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2922721/ /pubmed/19692737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2008.083535 Text en © 2009, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research Report
Urquia, Marcelo Luis
Glazier, Richard Henry
Blondel, Beatrice
Zeitlin, Jennifer
Gissler, Mika
Macfarlane, Alison
Ng, Edward
Heaman, Maureen
Stray-Pedersen, Babill
Gagnon, Anita J
International migration and adverse birth outcomes: role of ethnicity, region of origin and destination
title International migration and adverse birth outcomes: role of ethnicity, region of origin and destination
title_full International migration and adverse birth outcomes: role of ethnicity, region of origin and destination
title_fullStr International migration and adverse birth outcomes: role of ethnicity, region of origin and destination
title_full_unstemmed International migration and adverse birth outcomes: role of ethnicity, region of origin and destination
title_short International migration and adverse birth outcomes: role of ethnicity, region of origin and destination
title_sort international migration and adverse birth outcomes: role of ethnicity, region of origin and destination
topic Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2922721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19692737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2008.083535
work_keys_str_mv AT urquiamarceloluis internationalmigrationandadversebirthoutcomesroleofethnicityregionoforiginanddestination
AT glazierrichardhenry internationalmigrationandadversebirthoutcomesroleofethnicityregionoforiginanddestination
AT blondelbeatrice internationalmigrationandadversebirthoutcomesroleofethnicityregionoforiginanddestination
AT zeitlinjennifer internationalmigrationandadversebirthoutcomesroleofethnicityregionoforiginanddestination
AT gisslermika internationalmigrationandadversebirthoutcomesroleofethnicityregionoforiginanddestination
AT macfarlanealison internationalmigrationandadversebirthoutcomesroleofethnicityregionoforiginanddestination
AT ngedward internationalmigrationandadversebirthoutcomesroleofethnicityregionoforiginanddestination
AT heamanmaureen internationalmigrationandadversebirthoutcomesroleofethnicityregionoforiginanddestination
AT straypedersenbabill internationalmigrationandadversebirthoutcomesroleofethnicityregionoforiginanddestination
AT gagnonanitaj internationalmigrationandadversebirthoutcomesroleofethnicityregionoforiginanddestination
AT internationalmigrationandadversebirthoutcomesroleofethnicityregionoforiginanddestination