Cargando…

Entropy of balance - some recent results

BACKGROUND: Entropy when applied to biological signals is expected to reflect the state of the biological system. However the physiological interpretation of the entropy is not always straightforward. When should high entropy be interpreted as a healthy sign, and when as marker of deteriorating heal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borg, Frank G, Laxåback, Gerd
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2923165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20670457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-7-38
_version_ 1782185489120362496
author Borg, Frank G
Laxåback, Gerd
author_facet Borg, Frank G
Laxåback, Gerd
author_sort Borg, Frank G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Entropy when applied to biological signals is expected to reflect the state of the biological system. However the physiological interpretation of the entropy is not always straightforward. When should high entropy be interpreted as a healthy sign, and when as marker of deteriorating health? We address this question for the particular case of human standing balance and the Center of Pressure data. METHODS: We have measured and analyzed balance data of 136 participants (young, n = 45; elderly, n = 91) comprising in all 1085 trials, and calculated the Sample Entropy (SampEn) for medio-lateral (M/L) and anterior-posterior (A/P) Center of Pressure (COP) together with the Hurst self-similariy (ss) exponent α using Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA). The COP was measured with a force plate in eight 30 seconds trials with eyes closed, eyes open, foam, self-perturbation and nudge conditions. RESULTS: 1) There is a significant difference in SampEn for the A/P-direction between the elderly and the younger groups Old > young. 2) For the elderly we have in general A/P > M/L. 3) For the younger group there was no significant A/P-M/L difference with the exception for the nudge trials where we had the reverse situation, A/P < M/L. 4) For the elderly we have, Eyes Closed > Eyes Open. 5) In case of the Hurst ss-exponent we have for the elderly, M/L > A/P. CONCLUSIONS: These results seem to be require some modifications of the more or less established attention-constraint interpretation of entropy. This holds that higher entropy correlates with a more automatic and a less constrained mode of balance control, and that a higher entropy reflects, in this sense, a more efficient balancing.
format Text
id pubmed-2923165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29231652010-08-18 Entropy of balance - some recent results Borg, Frank G Laxåback, Gerd J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Entropy when applied to biological signals is expected to reflect the state of the biological system. However the physiological interpretation of the entropy is not always straightforward. When should high entropy be interpreted as a healthy sign, and when as marker of deteriorating health? We address this question for the particular case of human standing balance and the Center of Pressure data. METHODS: We have measured and analyzed balance data of 136 participants (young, n = 45; elderly, n = 91) comprising in all 1085 trials, and calculated the Sample Entropy (SampEn) for medio-lateral (M/L) and anterior-posterior (A/P) Center of Pressure (COP) together with the Hurst self-similariy (ss) exponent α using Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA). The COP was measured with a force plate in eight 30 seconds trials with eyes closed, eyes open, foam, self-perturbation and nudge conditions. RESULTS: 1) There is a significant difference in SampEn for the A/P-direction between the elderly and the younger groups Old > young. 2) For the elderly we have in general A/P > M/L. 3) For the younger group there was no significant A/P-M/L difference with the exception for the nudge trials where we had the reverse situation, A/P < M/L. 4) For the elderly we have, Eyes Closed > Eyes Open. 5) In case of the Hurst ss-exponent we have for the elderly, M/L > A/P. CONCLUSIONS: These results seem to be require some modifications of the more or less established attention-constraint interpretation of entropy. This holds that higher entropy correlates with a more automatic and a less constrained mode of balance control, and that a higher entropy reflects, in this sense, a more efficient balancing. BioMed Central 2010-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2923165/ /pubmed/20670457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-7-38 Text en Copyright ©2010 Borg and Laxåback; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Borg, Frank G
Laxåback, Gerd
Entropy of balance - some recent results
title Entropy of balance - some recent results
title_full Entropy of balance - some recent results
title_fullStr Entropy of balance - some recent results
title_full_unstemmed Entropy of balance - some recent results
title_short Entropy of balance - some recent results
title_sort entropy of balance - some recent results
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2923165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20670457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-7-38
work_keys_str_mv AT borgfrankg entropyofbalancesomerecentresults
AT laxabackgerd entropyofbalancesomerecentresults