Cargando…

Two Stage Hip Revision in Periprosthetic Infection: Results of 41 Cases

BACKGROUND: two-stage revision is considered the best treatment approach for the eradication of chronic joint infection. We report the outcome of 41 consecutive patients with infected hip prostheses, treated between 2000 and 2005, with two-stage revision using an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pignatti, Giovanni, Nitta, Shingo, Rani, Nicola, Dallari, Dante, Sabbioni, Giacomo, Stagni, Cesare, Giunti, Armando
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2923340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20721319
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001004010193
_version_ 1782185504511361024
author Pignatti, Giovanni
Nitta, Shingo
Rani, Nicola
Dallari, Dante
Sabbioni, Giacomo
Stagni, Cesare
Giunti, Armando
author_facet Pignatti, Giovanni
Nitta, Shingo
Rani, Nicola
Dallari, Dante
Sabbioni, Giacomo
Stagni, Cesare
Giunti, Armando
author_sort Pignatti, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: two-stage revision is considered the best treatment approach for the eradication of chronic joint infection. We report the outcome of 41 consecutive patients with infected hip prostheses, treated between 2000 and 2005, with two-stage revision using an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer. METHODS: Patients underwent a treatment protocol which included clinical and radiographic evaluation, laboratory investigations, hip aspiration, 99mTc-MDP and 99mTc-leukocyte-labeled scintigraphy and intraoperative assessment. All patients were diagnosed with a late chronic infection and classified as B-host according to the Cierny-Mader classification system. 9 patients out of 41 (22%) required a second interim treatment period, with exchange of the spacer. The proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus was similar between the one-spacer group and two-spacer group (28% vs 33%), whereas the proportion of patients with three or more risk factors was significantly higher in the two-spacer group than in the one-spacer group (28% vs 55%, respectively). RESULTS: Forty patients had final reimplantation, one patient had a resection arthroplasty. At an average follow-up of 5.3 years no recurrence of infection occurred. The average post-operative Harris hip score improved from 41 to 80. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of two-stage revision arthroplasty the adherence to the protocol proved to be effective for infection eradication and final reimplantation.
format Text
id pubmed-2923340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29233402010-08-18 Two Stage Hip Revision in Periprosthetic Infection: Results of 41 Cases Pignatti, Giovanni Nitta, Shingo Rani, Nicola Dallari, Dante Sabbioni, Giacomo Stagni, Cesare Giunti, Armando Open Orthop J Article BACKGROUND: two-stage revision is considered the best treatment approach for the eradication of chronic joint infection. We report the outcome of 41 consecutive patients with infected hip prostheses, treated between 2000 and 2005, with two-stage revision using an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer. METHODS: Patients underwent a treatment protocol which included clinical and radiographic evaluation, laboratory investigations, hip aspiration, 99mTc-MDP and 99mTc-leukocyte-labeled scintigraphy and intraoperative assessment. All patients were diagnosed with a late chronic infection and classified as B-host according to the Cierny-Mader classification system. 9 patients out of 41 (22%) required a second interim treatment period, with exchange of the spacer. The proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus was similar between the one-spacer group and two-spacer group (28% vs 33%), whereas the proportion of patients with three or more risk factors was significantly higher in the two-spacer group than in the one-spacer group (28% vs 55%, respectively). RESULTS: Forty patients had final reimplantation, one patient had a resection arthroplasty. At an average follow-up of 5.3 years no recurrence of infection occurred. The average post-operative Harris hip score improved from 41 to 80. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of two-stage revision arthroplasty the adherence to the protocol proved to be effective for infection eradication and final reimplantation. Bentham Open 2010-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2923340/ /pubmed/20721319 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001004010193 Text en © Pignatti et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Pignatti, Giovanni
Nitta, Shingo
Rani, Nicola
Dallari, Dante
Sabbioni, Giacomo
Stagni, Cesare
Giunti, Armando
Two Stage Hip Revision in Periprosthetic Infection: Results of 41 Cases
title Two Stage Hip Revision in Periprosthetic Infection: Results of 41 Cases
title_full Two Stage Hip Revision in Periprosthetic Infection: Results of 41 Cases
title_fullStr Two Stage Hip Revision in Periprosthetic Infection: Results of 41 Cases
title_full_unstemmed Two Stage Hip Revision in Periprosthetic Infection: Results of 41 Cases
title_short Two Stage Hip Revision in Periprosthetic Infection: Results of 41 Cases
title_sort two stage hip revision in periprosthetic infection: results of 41 cases
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2923340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20721319
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001004010193
work_keys_str_mv AT pignattigiovanni twostagehiprevisioninperiprostheticinfectionresultsof41cases
AT nittashingo twostagehiprevisioninperiprostheticinfectionresultsof41cases
AT raninicola twostagehiprevisioninperiprostheticinfectionresultsof41cases
AT dallaridante twostagehiprevisioninperiprostheticinfectionresultsof41cases
AT sabbionigiacomo twostagehiprevisioninperiprostheticinfectionresultsof41cases
AT stagnicesare twostagehiprevisioninperiprostheticinfectionresultsof41cases
AT giuntiarmando twostagehiprevisioninperiprostheticinfectionresultsof41cases