Cargando…

Making decisions for people with dementia who lack capacity: qualitative study of family carers in UK

Objective To identify common difficult decisions made by family carers on behalf of people with dementia, and facilitators of and barriers to such decisions, in order to produce information for family carers about overcoming barriers. Design Qualitative study to delineate decision areas through focu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Livingston, Gill, Leavey, Gerard, Manela, Monica, Livingston, Deborah, Rait, Greta, Sampson, Elizabeth, Bavishi, Shilpa, Shahriyarmolki, Khodayar, Cooper, Claudia
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2923693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20719843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4184
_version_ 1782185530410139648
author Livingston, Gill
Leavey, Gerard
Manela, Monica
Livingston, Deborah
Rait, Greta
Sampson, Elizabeth
Bavishi, Shilpa
Shahriyarmolki, Khodayar
Cooper, Claudia
author_facet Livingston, Gill
Leavey, Gerard
Manela, Monica
Livingston, Deborah
Rait, Greta
Sampson, Elizabeth
Bavishi, Shilpa
Shahriyarmolki, Khodayar
Cooper, Claudia
author_sort Livingston, Gill
collection PubMed
description Objective To identify common difficult decisions made by family carers on behalf of people with dementia, and facilitators of and barriers to such decisions, in order to produce information for family carers about overcoming barriers. Design Qualitative study to delineate decision areas through focus groups and complexity of decision making in individual interviews. Setting Community settings in London. Participants 43 family carers of people with dementia in focus groups and 46 carers who had already made such decisions in individual interviews. Results Family carers identified five core problematic areas of decision making: accessing dementia related health and social services; care homes; legal-financial matters; non-dementia related health care; and making plans for the person with dementia if the carer became too ill to care for them. They highlighted the difficulties in making proxy decisions, especially against active resistance, and their altered role of patient manager while still a family member. Families devised strategies to gain agreement in order to ensure that the person with dementia retained dignity. Conclusions The following strategies helped with implementation of decisions: introducing change slowly; organising legal changes for the carer as well as the patient; involving a professional to persuade the patient to accept services; and emphasising that services optimised, not impeded, independence. To access services, carers made patients’ general practice appointments, accompanied them to the surgery, pointed out symptoms, gained permission to receive confidential information, asked for referral to specialist services, and used professionals’ authority to gain patients’ agreement. End of life decisions were particularly difficult. They were helped by knowledge of the person with dementia’s previous views, clear prognostic information, and family support. Information sheets to help carers to overcome barriers to proxy decision making have been developed; their impact in practice has yet to be evaluated.
format Text
id pubmed-2923693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29236932010-08-19 Making decisions for people with dementia who lack capacity: qualitative study of family carers in UK Livingston, Gill Leavey, Gerard Manela, Monica Livingston, Deborah Rait, Greta Sampson, Elizabeth Bavishi, Shilpa Shahriyarmolki, Khodayar Cooper, Claudia BMJ Research Objective To identify common difficult decisions made by family carers on behalf of people with dementia, and facilitators of and barriers to such decisions, in order to produce information for family carers about overcoming barriers. Design Qualitative study to delineate decision areas through focus groups and complexity of decision making in individual interviews. Setting Community settings in London. Participants 43 family carers of people with dementia in focus groups and 46 carers who had already made such decisions in individual interviews. Results Family carers identified five core problematic areas of decision making: accessing dementia related health and social services; care homes; legal-financial matters; non-dementia related health care; and making plans for the person with dementia if the carer became too ill to care for them. They highlighted the difficulties in making proxy decisions, especially against active resistance, and their altered role of patient manager while still a family member. Families devised strategies to gain agreement in order to ensure that the person with dementia retained dignity. Conclusions The following strategies helped with implementation of decisions: introducing change slowly; organising legal changes for the carer as well as the patient; involving a professional to persuade the patient to accept services; and emphasising that services optimised, not impeded, independence. To access services, carers made patients’ general practice appointments, accompanied them to the surgery, pointed out symptoms, gained permission to receive confidential information, asked for referral to specialist services, and used professionals’ authority to gain patients’ agreement. End of life decisions were particularly difficult. They were helped by knowledge of the person with dementia’s previous views, clear prognostic information, and family support. Information sheets to help carers to overcome barriers to proxy decision making have been developed; their impact in practice has yet to be evaluated. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2010-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2923693/ /pubmed/20719843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4184 Text en © Livingston et al 2010 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Livingston, Gill
Leavey, Gerard
Manela, Monica
Livingston, Deborah
Rait, Greta
Sampson, Elizabeth
Bavishi, Shilpa
Shahriyarmolki, Khodayar
Cooper, Claudia
Making decisions for people with dementia who lack capacity: qualitative study of family carers in UK
title Making decisions for people with dementia who lack capacity: qualitative study of family carers in UK
title_full Making decisions for people with dementia who lack capacity: qualitative study of family carers in UK
title_fullStr Making decisions for people with dementia who lack capacity: qualitative study of family carers in UK
title_full_unstemmed Making decisions for people with dementia who lack capacity: qualitative study of family carers in UK
title_short Making decisions for people with dementia who lack capacity: qualitative study of family carers in UK
title_sort making decisions for people with dementia who lack capacity: qualitative study of family carers in uk
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2923693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20719843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4184
work_keys_str_mv AT livingstongill makingdecisionsforpeoplewithdementiawholackcapacityqualitativestudyoffamilycarersinuk
AT leaveygerard makingdecisionsforpeoplewithdementiawholackcapacityqualitativestudyoffamilycarersinuk
AT manelamonica makingdecisionsforpeoplewithdementiawholackcapacityqualitativestudyoffamilycarersinuk
AT livingstondeborah makingdecisionsforpeoplewithdementiawholackcapacityqualitativestudyoffamilycarersinuk
AT raitgreta makingdecisionsforpeoplewithdementiawholackcapacityqualitativestudyoffamilycarersinuk
AT sampsonelizabeth makingdecisionsforpeoplewithdementiawholackcapacityqualitativestudyoffamilycarersinuk
AT bavishishilpa makingdecisionsforpeoplewithdementiawholackcapacityqualitativestudyoffamilycarersinuk
AT shahriyarmolkikhodayar makingdecisionsforpeoplewithdementiawholackcapacityqualitativestudyoffamilycarersinuk
AT cooperclaudia makingdecisionsforpeoplewithdementiawholackcapacityqualitativestudyoffamilycarersinuk