Cargando…
Regulation of the Aurora-A gene following topoisomerase I inhibition: implication of the Myc transcription Factor
During the G2 phase of the cell cycle, the Aurora-A kinase plays an important role in centrosome maturation and progression to mitosis. In this study, we show in colorectal cell lines that Aurora-A expression is downregulated in response to topoisomerase I inhibition. Using chromatin immunoprecipita...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2924310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20682043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-9-205 |
_version_ | 1782185569532510208 |
---|---|
author | Courapied, Sandy Cherier, Julia Vigneron, Arnaud Troadec, Marie-Bérangère Giraud, Sandrine Valo, Isabelle Prigent, Claude Gamelin, Erick Coqueret, Olivier Barré, Benjamin |
author_facet | Courapied, Sandy Cherier, Julia Vigneron, Arnaud Troadec, Marie-Bérangère Giraud, Sandrine Valo, Isabelle Prigent, Claude Gamelin, Erick Coqueret, Olivier Barré, Benjamin |
author_sort | Courapied, Sandy |
collection | PubMed |
description | During the G2 phase of the cell cycle, the Aurora-A kinase plays an important role in centrosome maturation and progression to mitosis. In this study, we show in colorectal cell lines that Aurora-A expression is downregulated in response to topoisomerase I inhibition. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, we have observed that the Myc transcription factor and its Max binding partner are associated with the Aurora-A promoter during the G2 phase of the cell cycle. RNA interference experiments indicated that Myc is involved in the regulation of the Aurora-A gene. Following topoisomerase I inhibition, the expression of Myc decreased whereas Mad was upregulated, and the association of Myc and Max with the promoter of the kinase was inhibited. In parallel, an increased association of Mad and Miz-1 was detected on DNA, associated with an inhibition of the recruitment of transcriptional coactivators. Interestingly, a gain of H3K9 trimethylation and HP1γ recruitment was observed on the Aurora-A promoter following sn38 treatment, suggesting that this promoter is located within SAHF foci following genotoxic treatment. Since Aurora-A is involved in centrosome maturation, we observed as expected that topoisomerase I inhibition prevented centrosome separation but did not affect their duplication. As a consequence, this led to G2 arrest and senescence induction. These results suggest a model by which the Aurora-A gene is inactivated by the G2 checkpoint following topoisomerase I inhibition. We therefore propose the hypothesis that the coordinated overexpression of Myc and Aurora-A, together with a downregulation of Mad and Miz-1 should be tested as a prognosis signature of poor responses to topoisomerase I inhibitors. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2924310 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29243102010-08-20 Regulation of the Aurora-A gene following topoisomerase I inhibition: implication of the Myc transcription Factor Courapied, Sandy Cherier, Julia Vigneron, Arnaud Troadec, Marie-Bérangère Giraud, Sandrine Valo, Isabelle Prigent, Claude Gamelin, Erick Coqueret, Olivier Barré, Benjamin Mol Cancer Research During the G2 phase of the cell cycle, the Aurora-A kinase plays an important role in centrosome maturation and progression to mitosis. In this study, we show in colorectal cell lines that Aurora-A expression is downregulated in response to topoisomerase I inhibition. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, we have observed that the Myc transcription factor and its Max binding partner are associated with the Aurora-A promoter during the G2 phase of the cell cycle. RNA interference experiments indicated that Myc is involved in the regulation of the Aurora-A gene. Following topoisomerase I inhibition, the expression of Myc decreased whereas Mad was upregulated, and the association of Myc and Max with the promoter of the kinase was inhibited. In parallel, an increased association of Mad and Miz-1 was detected on DNA, associated with an inhibition of the recruitment of transcriptional coactivators. Interestingly, a gain of H3K9 trimethylation and HP1γ recruitment was observed on the Aurora-A promoter following sn38 treatment, suggesting that this promoter is located within SAHF foci following genotoxic treatment. Since Aurora-A is involved in centrosome maturation, we observed as expected that topoisomerase I inhibition prevented centrosome separation but did not affect their duplication. As a consequence, this led to G2 arrest and senescence induction. These results suggest a model by which the Aurora-A gene is inactivated by the G2 checkpoint following topoisomerase I inhibition. We therefore propose the hypothesis that the coordinated overexpression of Myc and Aurora-A, together with a downregulation of Mad and Miz-1 should be tested as a prognosis signature of poor responses to topoisomerase I inhibitors. BioMed Central 2010-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2924310/ /pubmed/20682043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-9-205 Text en Copyright ©2010 Courapied et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Courapied, Sandy Cherier, Julia Vigneron, Arnaud Troadec, Marie-Bérangère Giraud, Sandrine Valo, Isabelle Prigent, Claude Gamelin, Erick Coqueret, Olivier Barré, Benjamin Regulation of the Aurora-A gene following topoisomerase I inhibition: implication of the Myc transcription Factor |
title | Regulation of the Aurora-A gene following topoisomerase I inhibition: implication of the Myc transcription Factor |
title_full | Regulation of the Aurora-A gene following topoisomerase I inhibition: implication of the Myc transcription Factor |
title_fullStr | Regulation of the Aurora-A gene following topoisomerase I inhibition: implication of the Myc transcription Factor |
title_full_unstemmed | Regulation of the Aurora-A gene following topoisomerase I inhibition: implication of the Myc transcription Factor |
title_short | Regulation of the Aurora-A gene following topoisomerase I inhibition: implication of the Myc transcription Factor |
title_sort | regulation of the aurora-a gene following topoisomerase i inhibition: implication of the myc transcription factor |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2924310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20682043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-9-205 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT courapiedsandy regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor AT cherierjulia regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor AT vigneronarnaud regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor AT troadecmarieberangere regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor AT giraudsandrine regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor AT valoisabelle regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor AT prigentclaude regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor AT gamelinerick regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor AT coqueretolivier regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor AT barrebenjamin regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor |