Cargando…

Regulation of the Aurora-A gene following topoisomerase I inhibition: implication of the Myc transcription Factor

During the G2 phase of the cell cycle, the Aurora-A kinase plays an important role in centrosome maturation and progression to mitosis. In this study, we show in colorectal cell lines that Aurora-A expression is downregulated in response to topoisomerase I inhibition. Using chromatin immunoprecipita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Courapied, Sandy, Cherier, Julia, Vigneron, Arnaud, Troadec, Marie-Bérangère, Giraud, Sandrine, Valo, Isabelle, Prigent, Claude, Gamelin, Erick, Coqueret, Olivier, Barré, Benjamin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2924310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20682043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-9-205
_version_ 1782185569532510208
author Courapied, Sandy
Cherier, Julia
Vigneron, Arnaud
Troadec, Marie-Bérangère
Giraud, Sandrine
Valo, Isabelle
Prigent, Claude
Gamelin, Erick
Coqueret, Olivier
Barré, Benjamin
author_facet Courapied, Sandy
Cherier, Julia
Vigneron, Arnaud
Troadec, Marie-Bérangère
Giraud, Sandrine
Valo, Isabelle
Prigent, Claude
Gamelin, Erick
Coqueret, Olivier
Barré, Benjamin
author_sort Courapied, Sandy
collection PubMed
description During the G2 phase of the cell cycle, the Aurora-A kinase plays an important role in centrosome maturation and progression to mitosis. In this study, we show in colorectal cell lines that Aurora-A expression is downregulated in response to topoisomerase I inhibition. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, we have observed that the Myc transcription factor and its Max binding partner are associated with the Aurora-A promoter during the G2 phase of the cell cycle. RNA interference experiments indicated that Myc is involved in the regulation of the Aurora-A gene. Following topoisomerase I inhibition, the expression of Myc decreased whereas Mad was upregulated, and the association of Myc and Max with the promoter of the kinase was inhibited. In parallel, an increased association of Mad and Miz-1 was detected on DNA, associated with an inhibition of the recruitment of transcriptional coactivators. Interestingly, a gain of H3K9 trimethylation and HP1γ recruitment was observed on the Aurora-A promoter following sn38 treatment, suggesting that this promoter is located within SAHF foci following genotoxic treatment. Since Aurora-A is involved in centrosome maturation, we observed as expected that topoisomerase I inhibition prevented centrosome separation but did not affect their duplication. As a consequence, this led to G2 arrest and senescence induction. These results suggest a model by which the Aurora-A gene is inactivated by the G2 checkpoint following topoisomerase I inhibition. We therefore propose the hypothesis that the coordinated overexpression of Myc and Aurora-A, together with a downregulation of Mad and Miz-1 should be tested as a prognosis signature of poor responses to topoisomerase I inhibitors.
format Text
id pubmed-2924310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29243102010-08-20 Regulation of the Aurora-A gene following topoisomerase I inhibition: implication of the Myc transcription Factor Courapied, Sandy Cherier, Julia Vigneron, Arnaud Troadec, Marie-Bérangère Giraud, Sandrine Valo, Isabelle Prigent, Claude Gamelin, Erick Coqueret, Olivier Barré, Benjamin Mol Cancer Research During the G2 phase of the cell cycle, the Aurora-A kinase plays an important role in centrosome maturation and progression to mitosis. In this study, we show in colorectal cell lines that Aurora-A expression is downregulated in response to topoisomerase I inhibition. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, we have observed that the Myc transcription factor and its Max binding partner are associated with the Aurora-A promoter during the G2 phase of the cell cycle. RNA interference experiments indicated that Myc is involved in the regulation of the Aurora-A gene. Following topoisomerase I inhibition, the expression of Myc decreased whereas Mad was upregulated, and the association of Myc and Max with the promoter of the kinase was inhibited. In parallel, an increased association of Mad and Miz-1 was detected on DNA, associated with an inhibition of the recruitment of transcriptional coactivators. Interestingly, a gain of H3K9 trimethylation and HP1γ recruitment was observed on the Aurora-A promoter following sn38 treatment, suggesting that this promoter is located within SAHF foci following genotoxic treatment. Since Aurora-A is involved in centrosome maturation, we observed as expected that topoisomerase I inhibition prevented centrosome separation but did not affect their duplication. As a consequence, this led to G2 arrest and senescence induction. These results suggest a model by which the Aurora-A gene is inactivated by the G2 checkpoint following topoisomerase I inhibition. We therefore propose the hypothesis that the coordinated overexpression of Myc and Aurora-A, together with a downregulation of Mad and Miz-1 should be tested as a prognosis signature of poor responses to topoisomerase I inhibitors. BioMed Central 2010-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2924310/ /pubmed/20682043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-9-205 Text en Copyright ©2010 Courapied et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Courapied, Sandy
Cherier, Julia
Vigneron, Arnaud
Troadec, Marie-Bérangère
Giraud, Sandrine
Valo, Isabelle
Prigent, Claude
Gamelin, Erick
Coqueret, Olivier
Barré, Benjamin
Regulation of the Aurora-A gene following topoisomerase I inhibition: implication of the Myc transcription Factor
title Regulation of the Aurora-A gene following topoisomerase I inhibition: implication of the Myc transcription Factor
title_full Regulation of the Aurora-A gene following topoisomerase I inhibition: implication of the Myc transcription Factor
title_fullStr Regulation of the Aurora-A gene following topoisomerase I inhibition: implication of the Myc transcription Factor
title_full_unstemmed Regulation of the Aurora-A gene following topoisomerase I inhibition: implication of the Myc transcription Factor
title_short Regulation of the Aurora-A gene following topoisomerase I inhibition: implication of the Myc transcription Factor
title_sort regulation of the aurora-a gene following topoisomerase i inhibition: implication of the myc transcription factor
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2924310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20682043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-9-205
work_keys_str_mv AT courapiedsandy regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor
AT cherierjulia regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor
AT vigneronarnaud regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor
AT troadecmarieberangere regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor
AT giraudsandrine regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor
AT valoisabelle regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor
AT prigentclaude regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor
AT gamelinerick regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor
AT coqueretolivier regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor
AT barrebenjamin regulationoftheauroraagenefollowingtopoisomeraseiinhibitionimplicationofthemyctranscriptionfactor