Cargando…
Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions
BACKGROUND: The main objective of this research is to identify, categorize, and analyze barriers perceived by physicians to the adoption of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) in order to provide implementers with beneficial intervention options. METHODS: A systematic literature review, based on resea...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2924334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20691097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-231 |
_version_ | 1782185575281852416 |
---|---|
author | Boonstra, Albert Broekhuis, Manda |
author_facet | Boonstra, Albert Broekhuis, Manda |
author_sort | Boonstra, Albert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The main objective of this research is to identify, categorize, and analyze barriers perceived by physicians to the adoption of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) in order to provide implementers with beneficial intervention options. METHODS: A systematic literature review, based on research papers from 1998 to 2009, concerning barriers to the acceptance of EMRs by physicians was conducted. Four databases, "Science", "EBSCO", "PubMed" and "The Cochrane Library", were used in the literature search. Studies were included in the analysis if they reported on physicians' perceived barriers to implementing and using electronic medical records. Electronic medical records are defined as computerized medical information systems that collect, store and display patient information. RESULTS: The study includes twenty-two articles that have considered barriers to EMR as perceived by physicians. Eight main categories of barriers, including a total of 31 sub-categories, were identified. These eight categories are: A) Financial, B) Technical, C) Time, D) Psychological, E) Social, F) Legal, G) Organizational, and H) Change Process. All these categories are interrelated with each other. In particular, Categories G (Organizational) and H (Change Process) seem to be mediating factors on other barriers. By adopting a change management perspective, we develop some barrier-related interventions that could overcome the identified barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the positive effects of EMR usage in medical practices, the adoption rate of such systems is still low and meets resistance from physicians. This systematic review reveals that physicians may face a range of barriers when they approach EMR implementation. We conclude that the process of EMR implementation should be treated as a change project, and led by implementers or change managers, in medical practices. The quality of change management plays an important role in the success of EMR implementation. The barriers and suggested interventions highlighted in this study are intended to act as a reference for implementers of Electronic Medical Records. A careful diagnosis of the specific situation is required before relevant interventions can be determined. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2924334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29243342010-08-20 Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions Boonstra, Albert Broekhuis, Manda BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The main objective of this research is to identify, categorize, and analyze barriers perceived by physicians to the adoption of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) in order to provide implementers with beneficial intervention options. METHODS: A systematic literature review, based on research papers from 1998 to 2009, concerning barriers to the acceptance of EMRs by physicians was conducted. Four databases, "Science", "EBSCO", "PubMed" and "The Cochrane Library", were used in the literature search. Studies were included in the analysis if they reported on physicians' perceived barriers to implementing and using electronic medical records. Electronic medical records are defined as computerized medical information systems that collect, store and display patient information. RESULTS: The study includes twenty-two articles that have considered barriers to EMR as perceived by physicians. Eight main categories of barriers, including a total of 31 sub-categories, were identified. These eight categories are: A) Financial, B) Technical, C) Time, D) Psychological, E) Social, F) Legal, G) Organizational, and H) Change Process. All these categories are interrelated with each other. In particular, Categories G (Organizational) and H (Change Process) seem to be mediating factors on other barriers. By adopting a change management perspective, we develop some barrier-related interventions that could overcome the identified barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the positive effects of EMR usage in medical practices, the adoption rate of such systems is still low and meets resistance from physicians. This systematic review reveals that physicians may face a range of barriers when they approach EMR implementation. We conclude that the process of EMR implementation should be treated as a change project, and led by implementers or change managers, in medical practices. The quality of change management plays an important role in the success of EMR implementation. The barriers and suggested interventions highlighted in this study are intended to act as a reference for implementers of Electronic Medical Records. A careful diagnosis of the specific situation is required before relevant interventions can be determined. BioMed Central 2010-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2924334/ /pubmed/20691097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-231 Text en Copyright ©2010 Boonstra and Broekhuis; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Boonstra, Albert Broekhuis, Manda Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions |
title | Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions |
title_full | Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions |
title_fullStr | Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions |
title_short | Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions |
title_sort | barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2924334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20691097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-231 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boonstraalbert barrierstotheacceptanceofelectronicmedicalrecordsbyphysiciansfromsystematicreviewtotaxonomyandinterventions AT broekhuismanda barrierstotheacceptanceofelectronicmedicalrecordsbyphysiciansfromsystematicreviewtotaxonomyandinterventions |