Cargando…

The effect of external beam radiotherapy volume on locoregional control in patients with locoregionally advanced or recurrent nonanaplastic thyroid cancer

PURPOSE: We evaluated outcomes of patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for locoregionally advanced or recurrent nonanaplastic thyroid cancer and analyzed the effect of EBRT volume on locoregional control. METHODS: This study included 23 patients with locoregionally advanced or rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Tae Hyun, Chung, Ki-Wook, Lee, You Jin, Park, Chan Sung, Lee, Eun Kyung, Kim, Tae Sung, Kim, Seok Ki, Jung, Yoo Seok, Ryu, Jun Sun, Kim, Sang Soo, Cho, Kwan Ho, Shin, Kyung Hwan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2924345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20687967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-5-69
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: We evaluated outcomes of patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for locoregionally advanced or recurrent nonanaplastic thyroid cancer and analyzed the effect of EBRT volume on locoregional control. METHODS: This study included 23 patients with locoregionally advanced or recurrent nonanaplastic thyroid cancer who were treated with EBRT. Two different EBRT target volumes were executed as follows: 1) limited field (LF, n = 11) included the primary (involved lobe) or recurrent tumor bed and the positive nodal area; 2) elective field (EF, n = 12) included the primary (involved lobe) or recurrent tumor bed and the regional nodal areas in the cervical neck and upper mediastinum. Clinical parameters, such as gender, age, histologic type, recurrence, stage, thyroglobulin level, postoperative residuum, radioiodine treatment, and EBRT volume were analyzed to identify prognostic factors associated with locoregional control. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the clinical parameter distributions between the LF and EF groups. In the LF group, six (55%) patients developed locoregional recurrence and three (27%) developed distant metastasis. In the EF group, one (8%) patient developed locoregional recurrence and one (8%) developed a distant metastasis. There was a significant difference in locoregional control rate at 5 years in the LF and EF groups (40% vs. 89%, p = 0.041). There were no significant differences in incidences of acute and late toxicities between two groups (p >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: EBRT with EF provided significantly better locoregional control than that of LF; however, further larger scaled studies are warranted.