Cargando…

Evaluation of tumor motion effects on dose distribution for hypofractionated intensity‐modulated radiotherapy of non‐small‐cell lung cancer

Respiration‐induced tumor motion during intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) could cause substantial differences between planned and delivered doses. While it has been shown that, for conventionally fractionated IMRT, motion effects average out over the cours...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Hyejoo, Yorke, Ellen D., Yang, Jie, Chui, Chen‐Shou, Rosenzweig, Kenneth E., Amols, Howard I.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2924766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20717084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3182
_version_ 1782185625707872256
author Kang, Hyejoo
Yorke, Ellen D.
Yang, Jie
Chui, Chen‐Shou
Rosenzweig, Kenneth E.
Amols, Howard I.
author_facet Kang, Hyejoo
Yorke, Ellen D.
Yang, Jie
Chui, Chen‐Shou
Rosenzweig, Kenneth E.
Amols, Howard I.
author_sort Kang, Hyejoo
collection PubMed
description Respiration‐induced tumor motion during intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) could cause substantial differences between planned and delivered doses. While it has been shown that, for conventionally fractionated IMRT, motion effects average out over the course of many treatments, this might not be true for hypofractionated IMRT (IMHFRT). Numerical simulations were performed for nine NSCLC patients (11 tumors) to evaluate this problem. Dose distributions to the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) and Internal Target Volume (ITV) were retrospectively calculated using the previously‐calculated leaf motion files but with the addition of typical periodic motion (i.e. amplitude 0.36–1.26 cm, 3–8 sec period). A typical IMHFRT prescription of [Formula: see text] fractions was assumed. For the largest amplitude (1.26 cm), the average ± standard deviation of the ratio of simulated to planned mean dose, minimum dose, D95 and V95 were [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for the CTV, and [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for the ITV, respectively. There was minimal dependence on period or initial phase. For typical tumor geometries and respiratory amplitudes, changes in target coverage are minimal but can be significant for larger amplitudes, faster beam delivery, more highly‐modulated fields, and smaller field margins. PACS number: 87.55.dk
format Text
id pubmed-2924766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29247662018-04-02 Evaluation of tumor motion effects on dose distribution for hypofractionated intensity‐modulated radiotherapy of non‐small‐cell lung cancer Kang, Hyejoo Yorke, Ellen D. Yang, Jie Chui, Chen‐Shou Rosenzweig, Kenneth E. Amols, Howard I. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Respiration‐induced tumor motion during intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) could cause substantial differences between planned and delivered doses. While it has been shown that, for conventionally fractionated IMRT, motion effects average out over the course of many treatments, this might not be true for hypofractionated IMRT (IMHFRT). Numerical simulations were performed for nine NSCLC patients (11 tumors) to evaluate this problem. Dose distributions to the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) and Internal Target Volume (ITV) were retrospectively calculated using the previously‐calculated leaf motion files but with the addition of typical periodic motion (i.e. amplitude 0.36–1.26 cm, 3–8 sec period). A typical IMHFRT prescription of [Formula: see text] fractions was assumed. For the largest amplitude (1.26 cm), the average ± standard deviation of the ratio of simulated to planned mean dose, minimum dose, D95 and V95 were [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for the CTV, and [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for the ITV, respectively. There was minimal dependence on period or initial phase. For typical tumor geometries and respiratory amplitudes, changes in target coverage are minimal but can be significant for larger amplitudes, faster beam delivery, more highly‐modulated fields, and smaller field margins. PACS number: 87.55.dk John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2010-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2924766/ /pubmed/20717084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3182 Text en © 2010 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Kang, Hyejoo
Yorke, Ellen D.
Yang, Jie
Chui, Chen‐Shou
Rosenzweig, Kenneth E.
Amols, Howard I.
Evaluation of tumor motion effects on dose distribution for hypofractionated intensity‐modulated radiotherapy of non‐small‐cell lung cancer
title Evaluation of tumor motion effects on dose distribution for hypofractionated intensity‐modulated radiotherapy of non‐small‐cell lung cancer
title_full Evaluation of tumor motion effects on dose distribution for hypofractionated intensity‐modulated radiotherapy of non‐small‐cell lung cancer
title_fullStr Evaluation of tumor motion effects on dose distribution for hypofractionated intensity‐modulated radiotherapy of non‐small‐cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of tumor motion effects on dose distribution for hypofractionated intensity‐modulated radiotherapy of non‐small‐cell lung cancer
title_short Evaluation of tumor motion effects on dose distribution for hypofractionated intensity‐modulated radiotherapy of non‐small‐cell lung cancer
title_sort evaluation of tumor motion effects on dose distribution for hypofractionated intensity‐modulated radiotherapy of non‐small‐cell lung cancer
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2924766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20717084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3182
work_keys_str_mv AT kanghyejoo evaluationoftumormotioneffectsondosedistributionforhypofractionatedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yorkeellend evaluationoftumormotioneffectsondosedistributionforhypofractionatedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT yangjie evaluationoftumormotioneffectsondosedistributionforhypofractionatedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT chuichenshou evaluationoftumormotioneffectsondosedistributionforhypofractionatedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT rosenzweigkennethe evaluationoftumormotioneffectsondosedistributionforhypofractionatedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT amolshowardi evaluationoftumormotioneffectsondosedistributionforhypofractionatedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyofnonsmallcelllungcancer