Cargando…

Sagittal Abdominal Diameter as a Screening Tool in Clinical Research: Cutoffs for Cardiometabolic Risk

Background. Waist girth and BMI are commonly used as markers of cardiometabolic risk. Accumulating data however suggest that sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) or “abdominal height” may be a better marker of intra-abdominal adiposity and cardiometabolic risk. We aimed to identify cutoffs for SAD usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Risérus, U., de Faire, U., Berglund, L., Hellénius, M. -L.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2925288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20798888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/757939
_version_ 1782185661620551680
author Risérus, U.
de Faire, U.
Berglund, L.
Hellénius, M. -L.
author_facet Risérus, U.
de Faire, U.
Berglund, L.
Hellénius, M. -L.
author_sort Risérus, U.
collection PubMed
description Background. Waist girth and BMI are commonly used as markers of cardiometabolic risk. Accumulating data however suggest that sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) or “abdominal height” may be a better marker of intra-abdominal adiposity and cardiometabolic risk. We aimed to identify cutoffs for SAD using a cardiometabolic risk score. Design. A population-based cross-sectional study. Methods. In 4032 subjects (1936 men and 2096 women) at age 60, different anthropometric variables (SAD, BMI, waist girth, and waist-to-hip ratio) were measured and cardiometabolic risk score calculated. ROC curves were used to assess cutoffs. Results. Among men SAD showed the strongest correlations to the majority of the individual risk factors; whereas in women SAD was equal to that of waist girth. In the whole sample, the area under the ROC curve was highest for SAD. The optimal SAD cutoff for an elevated cardiometabolic risk score in men was ∼22 cm (95%CI; 21.6 to 22.8) and in women ∼20 cm (95%CI; 19.4 to 20.8). These cutoffs were similar if the Framingham risk score was used. Conclusions. These cutoffs may be used in research and screening to identify “metabolically obese” men who would benefit from lifestyle and pharmacological interventions. These results need to be verified in younger age groups.
format Text
id pubmed-2925288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29252882010-08-26 Sagittal Abdominal Diameter as a Screening Tool in Clinical Research: Cutoffs for Cardiometabolic Risk Risérus, U. de Faire, U. Berglund, L. Hellénius, M. -L. J Obes Research Article Background. Waist girth and BMI are commonly used as markers of cardiometabolic risk. Accumulating data however suggest that sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) or “abdominal height” may be a better marker of intra-abdominal adiposity and cardiometabolic risk. We aimed to identify cutoffs for SAD using a cardiometabolic risk score. Design. A population-based cross-sectional study. Methods. In 4032 subjects (1936 men and 2096 women) at age 60, different anthropometric variables (SAD, BMI, waist girth, and waist-to-hip ratio) were measured and cardiometabolic risk score calculated. ROC curves were used to assess cutoffs. Results. Among men SAD showed the strongest correlations to the majority of the individual risk factors; whereas in women SAD was equal to that of waist girth. In the whole sample, the area under the ROC curve was highest for SAD. The optimal SAD cutoff for an elevated cardiometabolic risk score in men was ∼22 cm (95%CI; 21.6 to 22.8) and in women ∼20 cm (95%CI; 19.4 to 20.8). These cutoffs were similar if the Framingham risk score was used. Conclusions. These cutoffs may be used in research and screening to identify “metabolically obese” men who would benefit from lifestyle and pharmacological interventions. These results need to be verified in younger age groups. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010 2010-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2925288/ /pubmed/20798888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/757939 Text en Copyright © 2010 U. Risérus et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Risérus, U.
de Faire, U.
Berglund, L.
Hellénius, M. -L.
Sagittal Abdominal Diameter as a Screening Tool in Clinical Research: Cutoffs for Cardiometabolic Risk
title Sagittal Abdominal Diameter as a Screening Tool in Clinical Research: Cutoffs for Cardiometabolic Risk
title_full Sagittal Abdominal Diameter as a Screening Tool in Clinical Research: Cutoffs for Cardiometabolic Risk
title_fullStr Sagittal Abdominal Diameter as a Screening Tool in Clinical Research: Cutoffs for Cardiometabolic Risk
title_full_unstemmed Sagittal Abdominal Diameter as a Screening Tool in Clinical Research: Cutoffs for Cardiometabolic Risk
title_short Sagittal Abdominal Diameter as a Screening Tool in Clinical Research: Cutoffs for Cardiometabolic Risk
title_sort sagittal abdominal diameter as a screening tool in clinical research: cutoffs for cardiometabolic risk
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2925288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20798888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/757939
work_keys_str_mv AT riserusu sagittalabdominaldiameterasascreeningtoolinclinicalresearchcutoffsforcardiometabolicrisk
AT defaireu sagittalabdominaldiameterasascreeningtoolinclinicalresearchcutoffsforcardiometabolicrisk
AT berglundl sagittalabdominaldiameterasascreeningtoolinclinicalresearchcutoffsforcardiometabolicrisk
AT helleniusml sagittalabdominaldiameterasascreeningtoolinclinicalresearchcutoffsforcardiometabolicrisk