Cargando…

Recurrent advanced colonic cancer occurring 11 years after initial endoscopic piecemeal resection: a case report

BACKGROUND: The high frequency of local recurrence occurring after endoscopic piecemeal resection (EPMR) for large colorectal tumors is a serious problem. However, almost all of these cases of local recurrence can be detected within 1 year and cured by additional endoscopic resection. We report a ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kishino, Takayoshi, Matsuda, Takahisa, Sakamoto, Taku, Nakajima, Takeshi, Taniguchi, Hirokazu, Yamamoto, Seiichiro, Saito, Yutaka
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2925815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20684791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-87
_version_ 1782185685607776256
author Kishino, Takayoshi
Matsuda, Takahisa
Sakamoto, Taku
Nakajima, Takeshi
Taniguchi, Hirokazu
Yamamoto, Seiichiro
Saito, Yutaka
author_facet Kishino, Takayoshi
Matsuda, Takahisa
Sakamoto, Taku
Nakajima, Takeshi
Taniguchi, Hirokazu
Yamamoto, Seiichiro
Saito, Yutaka
author_sort Kishino, Takayoshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The high frequency of local recurrence occurring after endoscopic piecemeal resection (EPMR) for large colorectal tumors is a serious problem. However, almost all of these cases of local recurrence can be detected within 1 year and cured by additional endoscopic resection. We report a rare case of recurrent advanced colonic cancer diagnosed 11 years after initial EPMR treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old male was diagnosed with a sigmoid colon lesion following a routine health check-up. Total colonoscopy revealed a 12 mm type 0-Is lesion in the sigmoid colon, which was diagnosed as an adenoma or intramucosal cancer and treated by EPMR in 1996. The post-resection defect was closed completely using metallic endoclips to avoid delayed bleeding. In 2007, at the third follow up, colonoscopy revealed a 20 mm submucosal tumor (SMT) like recurrence at the site of the previous EPMR. The recurrent lesion was treated by laparoscopic assisted sigmoidectomy with lymph node dissection. CONCLUSION: When it is difficult to evaluate the depth and margins of resected tumors following EPMR, it is important that the defect is not closed in order to avoid tumor implantation, missing residual lesions and to enable earlier detection of recurrence. It is crucial that the optimal follow-up protocol for EPMR cases is clarified, particularly how often and for how long they should be followed.
format Text
id pubmed-2925815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29258152010-08-24 Recurrent advanced colonic cancer occurring 11 years after initial endoscopic piecemeal resection: a case report Kishino, Takayoshi Matsuda, Takahisa Sakamoto, Taku Nakajima, Takeshi Taniguchi, Hirokazu Yamamoto, Seiichiro Saito, Yutaka BMC Gastroenterol Case Report BACKGROUND: The high frequency of local recurrence occurring after endoscopic piecemeal resection (EPMR) for large colorectal tumors is a serious problem. However, almost all of these cases of local recurrence can be detected within 1 year and cured by additional endoscopic resection. We report a rare case of recurrent advanced colonic cancer diagnosed 11 years after initial EPMR treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old male was diagnosed with a sigmoid colon lesion following a routine health check-up. Total colonoscopy revealed a 12 mm type 0-Is lesion in the sigmoid colon, which was diagnosed as an adenoma or intramucosal cancer and treated by EPMR in 1996. The post-resection defect was closed completely using metallic endoclips to avoid delayed bleeding. In 2007, at the third follow up, colonoscopy revealed a 20 mm submucosal tumor (SMT) like recurrence at the site of the previous EPMR. The recurrent lesion was treated by laparoscopic assisted sigmoidectomy with lymph node dissection. CONCLUSION: When it is difficult to evaluate the depth and margins of resected tumors following EPMR, it is important that the defect is not closed in order to avoid tumor implantation, missing residual lesions and to enable earlier detection of recurrence. It is crucial that the optimal follow-up protocol for EPMR cases is clarified, particularly how often and for how long they should be followed. BioMed Central 2010-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2925815/ /pubmed/20684791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-87 Text en Copyright ©2010 Kishino et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Kishino, Takayoshi
Matsuda, Takahisa
Sakamoto, Taku
Nakajima, Takeshi
Taniguchi, Hirokazu
Yamamoto, Seiichiro
Saito, Yutaka
Recurrent advanced colonic cancer occurring 11 years after initial endoscopic piecemeal resection: a case report
title Recurrent advanced colonic cancer occurring 11 years after initial endoscopic piecemeal resection: a case report
title_full Recurrent advanced colonic cancer occurring 11 years after initial endoscopic piecemeal resection: a case report
title_fullStr Recurrent advanced colonic cancer occurring 11 years after initial endoscopic piecemeal resection: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Recurrent advanced colonic cancer occurring 11 years after initial endoscopic piecemeal resection: a case report
title_short Recurrent advanced colonic cancer occurring 11 years after initial endoscopic piecemeal resection: a case report
title_sort recurrent advanced colonic cancer occurring 11 years after initial endoscopic piecemeal resection: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2925815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20684791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-87
work_keys_str_mv AT kishinotakayoshi recurrentadvancedcoloniccanceroccurring11yearsafterinitialendoscopicpiecemealresectionacasereport
AT matsudatakahisa recurrentadvancedcoloniccanceroccurring11yearsafterinitialendoscopicpiecemealresectionacasereport
AT sakamototaku recurrentadvancedcoloniccanceroccurring11yearsafterinitialendoscopicpiecemealresectionacasereport
AT nakajimatakeshi recurrentadvancedcoloniccanceroccurring11yearsafterinitialendoscopicpiecemealresectionacasereport
AT taniguchihirokazu recurrentadvancedcoloniccanceroccurring11yearsafterinitialendoscopicpiecemealresectionacasereport
AT yamamotoseiichiro recurrentadvancedcoloniccanceroccurring11yearsafterinitialendoscopicpiecemealresectionacasereport
AT saitoyutaka recurrentadvancedcoloniccanceroccurring11yearsafterinitialendoscopicpiecemealresectionacasereport