Cargando…

Complex Exon-Intron Marking by Histone Modifications Is Not Determined Solely by Nucleosome Distribution

It has recently been shown that nucleosome distribution, histone modifications and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) occupancy show preferential association with exons (“exon-intron marking”), linking chromatin structure and function to co-transcriptional splicing in a variety of eukaryotes. Previous ChIP-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhami, Pawandeep, Saffrey, Peter, Bruce, Alexander W., Dillon, Shane C., Chiang, Kelly, Bonhoure, Nicolas, Koch, Christoph M., Bye, Jackie, James, Keith, Foad, Nicola S., Ellis, Peter, Watkins, Nicholas A., Ouwehand, Willem H., Langford, Cordelia, Andrews, Robert M., Dunham, Ian, Vetrie, David
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2925886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20808788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012339
_version_ 1782185690449051648
author Dhami, Pawandeep
Saffrey, Peter
Bruce, Alexander W.
Dillon, Shane C.
Chiang, Kelly
Bonhoure, Nicolas
Koch, Christoph M.
Bye, Jackie
James, Keith
Foad, Nicola S.
Ellis, Peter
Watkins, Nicholas A.
Ouwehand, Willem H.
Langford, Cordelia
Andrews, Robert M.
Dunham, Ian
Vetrie, David
author_facet Dhami, Pawandeep
Saffrey, Peter
Bruce, Alexander W.
Dillon, Shane C.
Chiang, Kelly
Bonhoure, Nicolas
Koch, Christoph M.
Bye, Jackie
James, Keith
Foad, Nicola S.
Ellis, Peter
Watkins, Nicholas A.
Ouwehand, Willem H.
Langford, Cordelia
Andrews, Robert M.
Dunham, Ian
Vetrie, David
author_sort Dhami, Pawandeep
collection PubMed
description It has recently been shown that nucleosome distribution, histone modifications and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) occupancy show preferential association with exons (“exon-intron marking”), linking chromatin structure and function to co-transcriptional splicing in a variety of eukaryotes. Previous ChIP-sequencing studies suggested that these marking patterns reflect the nucleosomal landscape. By analyzing ChIP-chip datasets across the human genome in three cell types, we have found that this marking system is far more complex than previously observed. We show here that a range of histone modifications and Pol II are preferentially associated with exons. However, there is noticeable cell-type specificity in the degree of exon marking by histone modifications and, surprisingly, this is also reflected in some histone modifications patterns showing biases towards introns. Exon-intron marking is laid down in the absence of transcription on silent genes, with some marking biases changing or becoming reversed for genes expressed at different levels. Furthermore, the relationship of this marking system with splicing is not simple, with only some histone modifications reflecting exon usage/inclusion, while others mirror patterns of exon exclusion. By examining nucleosomal distributions in all three cell types, we demonstrate that these histone modification patterns cannot solely be accounted for by differences in nucleosome levels between exons and introns. In addition, because of inherent differences between ChIP-chip array and ChIP-sequencing approaches, these platforms report different nucleosome distribution patterns across the human genome. Our findings confound existing views and point to active cellular mechanisms which dynamically regulate histone modification levels and account for exon-intron marking. We believe that these histone modification patterns provide links between chromatin accessibility, Pol II movement and co-transcriptional splicing.
format Text
id pubmed-2925886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29258862010-08-31 Complex Exon-Intron Marking by Histone Modifications Is Not Determined Solely by Nucleosome Distribution Dhami, Pawandeep Saffrey, Peter Bruce, Alexander W. Dillon, Shane C. Chiang, Kelly Bonhoure, Nicolas Koch, Christoph M. Bye, Jackie James, Keith Foad, Nicola S. Ellis, Peter Watkins, Nicholas A. Ouwehand, Willem H. Langford, Cordelia Andrews, Robert M. Dunham, Ian Vetrie, David PLoS One Research Article It has recently been shown that nucleosome distribution, histone modifications and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) occupancy show preferential association with exons (“exon-intron marking”), linking chromatin structure and function to co-transcriptional splicing in a variety of eukaryotes. Previous ChIP-sequencing studies suggested that these marking patterns reflect the nucleosomal landscape. By analyzing ChIP-chip datasets across the human genome in three cell types, we have found that this marking system is far more complex than previously observed. We show here that a range of histone modifications and Pol II are preferentially associated with exons. However, there is noticeable cell-type specificity in the degree of exon marking by histone modifications and, surprisingly, this is also reflected in some histone modifications patterns showing biases towards introns. Exon-intron marking is laid down in the absence of transcription on silent genes, with some marking biases changing or becoming reversed for genes expressed at different levels. Furthermore, the relationship of this marking system with splicing is not simple, with only some histone modifications reflecting exon usage/inclusion, while others mirror patterns of exon exclusion. By examining nucleosomal distributions in all three cell types, we demonstrate that these histone modification patterns cannot solely be accounted for by differences in nucleosome levels between exons and introns. In addition, because of inherent differences between ChIP-chip array and ChIP-sequencing approaches, these platforms report different nucleosome distribution patterns across the human genome. Our findings confound existing views and point to active cellular mechanisms which dynamically regulate histone modification levels and account for exon-intron marking. We believe that these histone modification patterns provide links between chromatin accessibility, Pol II movement and co-transcriptional splicing. Public Library of Science 2010-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2925886/ /pubmed/20808788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012339 Text en Dhami et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dhami, Pawandeep
Saffrey, Peter
Bruce, Alexander W.
Dillon, Shane C.
Chiang, Kelly
Bonhoure, Nicolas
Koch, Christoph M.
Bye, Jackie
James, Keith
Foad, Nicola S.
Ellis, Peter
Watkins, Nicholas A.
Ouwehand, Willem H.
Langford, Cordelia
Andrews, Robert M.
Dunham, Ian
Vetrie, David
Complex Exon-Intron Marking by Histone Modifications Is Not Determined Solely by Nucleosome Distribution
title Complex Exon-Intron Marking by Histone Modifications Is Not Determined Solely by Nucleosome Distribution
title_full Complex Exon-Intron Marking by Histone Modifications Is Not Determined Solely by Nucleosome Distribution
title_fullStr Complex Exon-Intron Marking by Histone Modifications Is Not Determined Solely by Nucleosome Distribution
title_full_unstemmed Complex Exon-Intron Marking by Histone Modifications Is Not Determined Solely by Nucleosome Distribution
title_short Complex Exon-Intron Marking by Histone Modifications Is Not Determined Solely by Nucleosome Distribution
title_sort complex exon-intron marking by histone modifications is not determined solely by nucleosome distribution
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2925886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20808788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012339
work_keys_str_mv AT dhamipawandeep complexexonintronmarkingbyhistonemodificationsisnotdeterminedsolelybynucleosomedistribution
AT saffreypeter complexexonintronmarkingbyhistonemodificationsisnotdeterminedsolelybynucleosomedistribution
AT brucealexanderw complexexonintronmarkingbyhistonemodificationsisnotdeterminedsolelybynucleosomedistribution
AT dillonshanec complexexonintronmarkingbyhistonemodificationsisnotdeterminedsolelybynucleosomedistribution
AT chiangkelly complexexonintronmarkingbyhistonemodificationsisnotdeterminedsolelybynucleosomedistribution
AT bonhourenicolas complexexonintronmarkingbyhistonemodificationsisnotdeterminedsolelybynucleosomedistribution
AT kochchristophm complexexonintronmarkingbyhistonemodificationsisnotdeterminedsolelybynucleosomedistribution
AT byejackie complexexonintronmarkingbyhistonemodificationsisnotdeterminedsolelybynucleosomedistribution
AT jameskeith complexexonintronmarkingbyhistonemodificationsisnotdeterminedsolelybynucleosomedistribution
AT foadnicolas complexexonintronmarkingbyhistonemodificationsisnotdeterminedsolelybynucleosomedistribution
AT ellispeter complexexonintronmarkingbyhistonemodificationsisnotdeterminedsolelybynucleosomedistribution
AT watkinsnicholasa complexexonintronmarkingbyhistonemodificationsisnotdeterminedsolelybynucleosomedistribution
AT ouwehandwillemh complexexonintronmarkingbyhistonemodificationsisnotdeterminedsolelybynucleosomedistribution
AT langfordcordelia complexexonintronmarkingbyhistonemodificationsisnotdeterminedsolelybynucleosomedistribution
AT andrewsrobertm complexexonintronmarkingbyhistonemodificationsisnotdeterminedsolelybynucleosomedistribution
AT dunhamian complexexonintronmarkingbyhistonemodificationsisnotdeterminedsolelybynucleosomedistribution
AT vetriedavid complexexonintronmarkingbyhistonemodificationsisnotdeterminedsolelybynucleosomedistribution