Cargando…

Evaluation of atypical squamous cells on conventional cytology smears: An experience from a screening program practiced in limited resource settings

BACKGROUND: The Bethesda system (TBS) 2001 has subdivided the category of atypical squamous cells (ASC) into: ASC-US (undetermined significance) and ASC-H (cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)). The present study is an analysis of ASC-US and ASC-H cases diagnosed in a scr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rekhi, Bharat, Ajit, Dulhan, Joseph, Santhosh K, Gawas, Sonali, Deodhar, Kedar K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2926911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20806086
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1742-6413.67110
_version_ 1782185737393799168
author Rekhi, Bharat
Ajit, Dulhan
Joseph, Santhosh K
Gawas, Sonali
Deodhar, Kedar K
author_facet Rekhi, Bharat
Ajit, Dulhan
Joseph, Santhosh K
Gawas, Sonali
Deodhar, Kedar K
author_sort Rekhi, Bharat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Bethesda system (TBS) 2001 has subdivided the category of atypical squamous cells (ASC) into: ASC-US (undetermined significance) and ASC-H (cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)). The present study is an analysis of ASC-US and ASC-H cases diagnosed in a screening program practiced in limited resource settings. METHODS: During the period January 2005 to December 2008, a total of 9190 smears were received, of which 568 were unsatisfactory. Cases initially diagnosed as ASC-US (n=74) and ASC-H (n=29) on conventional cytology smears were reviewed. Biopsy and human papilloma virus (HPV) results were available in limited cases. RESULTS: On review, diagnosis of ASC-US was retained in 49 (66.2%) of the 74 initially diagnosed ASC-US cases. Remaining 12 cases were re-labeled as negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM), nine as low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), three as ASC-H and one case as squamous carcinoma (SCC). Similarly, on review, diagnosis of ASC-H cases was retained in 17 of the 29 initially diagnosed ASC-H cases. Seven cases were re-labeled as NILM, three as HSIL and one case each as ASC-US and SCC. Overall, 8622 cases (96.6%) were diagnosed as NILM, 72 (0.83%) as LSIL, 121 (1.40%) as HSIL, 23 (0.26%) as SCC, 50 (0.57%) as ASC-US cases, 20 (0.23%) as ASC-H, five (0.05%) as atypical glandular cells (AGC) and two cases as adenocarcinomas. Out of 50 ASC-US cases, biopsy in 23 cases showed presence of CIN 1 in 16 cases (69.5%) and CIN 2 in one case (4.34%), while the remaining six cases were negative for CIN/malignancy. The remaining 20 cases with unavailable biopsy results were HPV-positive. Out of 20 ASC-H cases, biopsy in 15 revealed CIN 2 and above in 11 cases (73.3%). Three cases (20%) revealed CIN 1. CONCLUSIONS: Critical review is helpful in further reducing the number of ASC cases. The percentage of cases with CIN 2 and above is higher with ASC-H cases. The reason for relative increase in HSILs in the present study included referral bias in the screening program.
format Text
id pubmed-2926911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29269112010-08-30 Evaluation of atypical squamous cells on conventional cytology smears: An experience from a screening program practiced in limited resource settings Rekhi, Bharat Ajit, Dulhan Joseph, Santhosh K Gawas, Sonali Deodhar, Kedar K Cytojournal Research Article BACKGROUND: The Bethesda system (TBS) 2001 has subdivided the category of atypical squamous cells (ASC) into: ASC-US (undetermined significance) and ASC-H (cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)). The present study is an analysis of ASC-US and ASC-H cases diagnosed in a screening program practiced in limited resource settings. METHODS: During the period January 2005 to December 2008, a total of 9190 smears were received, of which 568 were unsatisfactory. Cases initially diagnosed as ASC-US (n=74) and ASC-H (n=29) on conventional cytology smears were reviewed. Biopsy and human papilloma virus (HPV) results were available in limited cases. RESULTS: On review, diagnosis of ASC-US was retained in 49 (66.2%) of the 74 initially diagnosed ASC-US cases. Remaining 12 cases were re-labeled as negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM), nine as low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), three as ASC-H and one case as squamous carcinoma (SCC). Similarly, on review, diagnosis of ASC-H cases was retained in 17 of the 29 initially diagnosed ASC-H cases. Seven cases were re-labeled as NILM, three as HSIL and one case each as ASC-US and SCC. Overall, 8622 cases (96.6%) were diagnosed as NILM, 72 (0.83%) as LSIL, 121 (1.40%) as HSIL, 23 (0.26%) as SCC, 50 (0.57%) as ASC-US cases, 20 (0.23%) as ASC-H, five (0.05%) as atypical glandular cells (AGC) and two cases as adenocarcinomas. Out of 50 ASC-US cases, biopsy in 23 cases showed presence of CIN 1 in 16 cases (69.5%) and CIN 2 in one case (4.34%), while the remaining six cases were negative for CIN/malignancy. The remaining 20 cases with unavailable biopsy results were HPV-positive. Out of 20 ASC-H cases, biopsy in 15 revealed CIN 2 and above in 11 cases (73.3%). Three cases (20%) revealed CIN 1. CONCLUSIONS: Critical review is helpful in further reducing the number of ASC cases. The percentage of cases with CIN 2 and above is higher with ASC-H cases. The reason for relative increase in HSILs in the present study included referral bias in the screening program. Medknow Publications 2010-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2926911/ /pubmed/20806086 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1742-6413.67110 Text en © 2010 Rekhi et al; licensee Cytopathology Foundation Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rekhi, Bharat
Ajit, Dulhan
Joseph, Santhosh K
Gawas, Sonali
Deodhar, Kedar K
Evaluation of atypical squamous cells on conventional cytology smears: An experience from a screening program practiced in limited resource settings
title Evaluation of atypical squamous cells on conventional cytology smears: An experience from a screening program practiced in limited resource settings
title_full Evaluation of atypical squamous cells on conventional cytology smears: An experience from a screening program practiced in limited resource settings
title_fullStr Evaluation of atypical squamous cells on conventional cytology smears: An experience from a screening program practiced in limited resource settings
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of atypical squamous cells on conventional cytology smears: An experience from a screening program practiced in limited resource settings
title_short Evaluation of atypical squamous cells on conventional cytology smears: An experience from a screening program practiced in limited resource settings
title_sort evaluation of atypical squamous cells on conventional cytology smears: an experience from a screening program practiced in limited resource settings
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2926911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20806086
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1742-6413.67110
work_keys_str_mv AT rekhibharat evaluationofatypicalsquamouscellsonconventionalcytologysmearsanexperiencefromascreeningprogrampracticedinlimitedresourcesettings
AT ajitdulhan evaluationofatypicalsquamouscellsonconventionalcytologysmearsanexperiencefromascreeningprogrampracticedinlimitedresourcesettings
AT josephsanthoshk evaluationofatypicalsquamouscellsonconventionalcytologysmearsanexperiencefromascreeningprogrampracticedinlimitedresourcesettings
AT gawassonali evaluationofatypicalsquamouscellsonconventionalcytologysmearsanexperiencefromascreeningprogrampracticedinlimitedresourcesettings
AT deodharkedark evaluationofatypicalsquamouscellsonconventionalcytologysmearsanexperiencefromascreeningprogrampracticedinlimitedresourcesettings