Cargando…
Relative effectiveness and adverse effects of cervical manipulation, mobilisation and the activator instrument in patients with sub-acute non-specific neck pain: results from a stopped randomised trial
BACKGROUND: Neck pain of a mechanical nature is a common complaint seen by practitioners of manual medicine, who use a multitude of methods to treat the condition. It is not known, however, if any of these methods are superior in treatment effectiveness. This trial was stopped due to poor recruitmen...
Autores principales: | Gemmell, Hugh, Miller, Peter |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2927873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20618936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-18-20 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
por: Gemmell, Hugh, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Neuroimmune responses following joint mobilisation and manipulation in people with persistent neck pain: a protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial
por: Lutke Schipholt, Ivo J, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Clinical effectiveness of manipulation and mobilisation interventions for the treatment of non-specific neck pain: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Bailey, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Immediate systemic neuroimmune responses following spinal mobilisation and manipulation in people with non-specific neck pain: a randomised placebo-controlled trial
por: Lutke Schipholt, Ivo J., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Immediate effect of craniocervical flexion exercise and Mulligan mobilisation in patients with mechanical neck pain — A randomised clinical trial
por: Shelke, Ashwini, et al.
Publicado: (2023)