Cargando…
Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep
BACKGROUND: Gene expression divergence is a phenotypic trait reflecting evolution of gene regulation and characterizing dissimilarity between species and between cells and tissues within the same species. Several distance measures, such as Euclidean and correlation-based distances have been proposed...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2928186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20691088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-5-51 |
_version_ | 1782185832374861824 |
---|---|
author | Glazko, Galina Mushegian, Arcady |
author_facet | Glazko, Galina Mushegian, Arcady |
author_sort | Glazko, Galina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gene expression divergence is a phenotypic trait reflecting evolution of gene regulation and characterizing dissimilarity between species and between cells and tissues within the same species. Several distance measures, such as Euclidean and correlation-based distances have been proposed for measuring expression divergence. RESULTS: We show that different distance measures identify different trends in gene expression patterns. When comparing orthologous genes in eight rat and human tissues, the Euclidean distance identified genes uniformly expressed in all tissues near the expression background as genes with the most conserved expression pattern. In contrast, correlation-based distance and generalized-average distance identified genes with concerted changes among homologous tissues as those most conserved. On the other hand, correlation-based distance, Euclidean distance and generalized-average distance highlight quite well the relatively high similarity of gene expression patterns in homologous tissues between species, compared to non-homologous tissues within species. CONCLUSIONS: Different trends exist in the high-dimensional numeric data, and to highlight a particular trend an appropriate distance measure needs to be chosen. The choice of the distance measure for measuring expression divergence can be dictated by the expression patterns that are of interest in a particular study. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Mikhail Gelfand, Eugene Koonin and Subhajyoti De (nominated by Sarah Teichmann). |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2928186 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29281862010-08-26 Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep Glazko, Galina Mushegian, Arcady Biol Direct Research BACKGROUND: Gene expression divergence is a phenotypic trait reflecting evolution of gene regulation and characterizing dissimilarity between species and between cells and tissues within the same species. Several distance measures, such as Euclidean and correlation-based distances have been proposed for measuring expression divergence. RESULTS: We show that different distance measures identify different trends in gene expression patterns. When comparing orthologous genes in eight rat and human tissues, the Euclidean distance identified genes uniformly expressed in all tissues near the expression background as genes with the most conserved expression pattern. In contrast, correlation-based distance and generalized-average distance identified genes with concerted changes among homologous tissues as those most conserved. On the other hand, correlation-based distance, Euclidean distance and generalized-average distance highlight quite well the relatively high similarity of gene expression patterns in homologous tissues between species, compared to non-homologous tissues within species. CONCLUSIONS: Different trends exist in the high-dimensional numeric data, and to highlight a particular trend an appropriate distance measure needs to be chosen. The choice of the distance measure for measuring expression divergence can be dictated by the expression patterns that are of interest in a particular study. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Mikhail Gelfand, Eugene Koonin and Subhajyoti De (nominated by Sarah Teichmann). BioMed Central 2010-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2928186/ /pubmed/20691088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-5-51 Text en Copyright ©2010 Glazko and Mushegian; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Glazko, Galina Mushegian, Arcady Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep |
title | Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep |
title_full | Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep |
title_fullStr | Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep |
title_short | Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep |
title_sort | measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2928186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20691088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-5-51 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glazkogalina measuringgeneexpressiondivergencethedistancetokeep AT mushegianarcady measuringgeneexpressiondivergencethedistancetokeep |