Cargando…

Sleep and recovery in physicians on night call: a longitudinal field study

BACKGROUND: It is well known that physicians' night-call duty may cause impaired performance and adverse effects on subjective health, but there is limited knowledge about effects on sleep duration and recovery time. In recent years occupational stress and impaired well-being among anaesthesiol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malmberg, Birgitta, Kecklund, Göran, Karlson, Björn, Persson, Roger, Flisberg, Per, Ørbaek, Palle
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2928216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20712854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-239
_version_ 1782185839627862016
author Malmberg, Birgitta
Kecklund, Göran
Karlson, Björn
Persson, Roger
Flisberg, Per
Ørbaek, Palle
author_facet Malmberg, Birgitta
Kecklund, Göran
Karlson, Björn
Persson, Roger
Flisberg, Per
Ørbaek, Palle
author_sort Malmberg, Birgitta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is well known that physicians' night-call duty may cause impaired performance and adverse effects on subjective health, but there is limited knowledge about effects on sleep duration and recovery time. In recent years occupational stress and impaired well-being among anaesthesiologists have been frequently reported for in the scientific literature. Given their main focus on handling patients with life-threatening conditions, when on call, one might expect sleep and recovery to be negatively affected by work, especially in this specialist group. The aim of the present study was to examine whether a 16-hour night-call schedule allowed for sufficient recovery in anaesthesiologists compared with other physician specialists handling less life-threatening conditions, when on call. METHODS: Sleep, monitored by actigraphy and Karolinska Sleep Diary/Sleepiness Scale on one night after daytime work, one night call, the following first and second nights post-call, and a Saturday night, was compared between 15 anaesthesiologists and 17 paediatricians and ear, nose, and throat surgeons. RESULTS: Recovery patterns over the days after night call did not differ between groups, but between days. Mean night sleep for all physicians was 3 hours when on call, 7 h both nights post-call and Saturday, and 6 h after daytime work (p < 0.001). Scores for mental fatigue and feeling well rested were poorer post-call, but returned to Sunday morning levels after two nights' sleep. CONCLUSIONS: Despite considerable sleep loss during work on night call, and unexpectedly short sleep after ordinary day work, the physicians' self-reports indicate full recovery after two nights' sleep. We conclude that these 16-hour night duties were compatible with a short-term recovery in both physician groups, but the limited sleep duration in general still implies a long-term health concern. These results may contribute to the establishment of safe working hours for night-call duty in physicians and other health-care workers.
format Text
id pubmed-2928216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29282162010-08-26 Sleep and recovery in physicians on night call: a longitudinal field study Malmberg, Birgitta Kecklund, Göran Karlson, Björn Persson, Roger Flisberg, Per Ørbaek, Palle BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: It is well known that physicians' night-call duty may cause impaired performance and adverse effects on subjective health, but there is limited knowledge about effects on sleep duration and recovery time. In recent years occupational stress and impaired well-being among anaesthesiologists have been frequently reported for in the scientific literature. Given their main focus on handling patients with life-threatening conditions, when on call, one might expect sleep and recovery to be negatively affected by work, especially in this specialist group. The aim of the present study was to examine whether a 16-hour night-call schedule allowed for sufficient recovery in anaesthesiologists compared with other physician specialists handling less life-threatening conditions, when on call. METHODS: Sleep, monitored by actigraphy and Karolinska Sleep Diary/Sleepiness Scale on one night after daytime work, one night call, the following first and second nights post-call, and a Saturday night, was compared between 15 anaesthesiologists and 17 paediatricians and ear, nose, and throat surgeons. RESULTS: Recovery patterns over the days after night call did not differ between groups, but between days. Mean night sleep for all physicians was 3 hours when on call, 7 h both nights post-call and Saturday, and 6 h after daytime work (p < 0.001). Scores for mental fatigue and feeling well rested were poorer post-call, but returned to Sunday morning levels after two nights' sleep. CONCLUSIONS: Despite considerable sleep loss during work on night call, and unexpectedly short sleep after ordinary day work, the physicians' self-reports indicate full recovery after two nights' sleep. We conclude that these 16-hour night duties were compatible with a short-term recovery in both physician groups, but the limited sleep duration in general still implies a long-term health concern. These results may contribute to the establishment of safe working hours for night-call duty in physicians and other health-care workers. BioMed Central 2010-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2928216/ /pubmed/20712854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-239 Text en Copyright ©2010 Malmberg et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Malmberg, Birgitta
Kecklund, Göran
Karlson, Björn
Persson, Roger
Flisberg, Per
Ørbaek, Palle
Sleep and recovery in physicians on night call: a longitudinal field study
title Sleep and recovery in physicians on night call: a longitudinal field study
title_full Sleep and recovery in physicians on night call: a longitudinal field study
title_fullStr Sleep and recovery in physicians on night call: a longitudinal field study
title_full_unstemmed Sleep and recovery in physicians on night call: a longitudinal field study
title_short Sleep and recovery in physicians on night call: a longitudinal field study
title_sort sleep and recovery in physicians on night call: a longitudinal field study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2928216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20712854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-239
work_keys_str_mv AT malmbergbirgitta sleepandrecoveryinphysiciansonnightcallalongitudinalfieldstudy
AT kecklundgoran sleepandrecoveryinphysiciansonnightcallalongitudinalfieldstudy
AT karlsonbjorn sleepandrecoveryinphysiciansonnightcallalongitudinalfieldstudy
AT perssonroger sleepandrecoveryinphysiciansonnightcallalongitudinalfieldstudy
AT flisbergper sleepandrecoveryinphysiciansonnightcallalongitudinalfieldstudy
AT ørbaekpalle sleepandrecoveryinphysiciansonnightcallalongitudinalfieldstudy