Cargando…

Quantitative Comparison of Constitutive Promoters in Human ES cells

BACKGROUND: Constitutive promoters that ensure sustained and high level gene expression are basic research tools that have a wide range of applications, including studies of human embryology and drug discovery in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). Numerous cellular/viral promoters that ensure susta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Norrman, Karin, Fischer, Yvonne, Bonnamy, Blandine, Wolfhagen Sand, Fredrik, Ravassard, Philippe, Semb, Henrik
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2928720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20865032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012413
_version_ 1782185870830338048
author Norrman, Karin
Fischer, Yvonne
Bonnamy, Blandine
Wolfhagen Sand, Fredrik
Ravassard, Philippe
Semb, Henrik
author_facet Norrman, Karin
Fischer, Yvonne
Bonnamy, Blandine
Wolfhagen Sand, Fredrik
Ravassard, Philippe
Semb, Henrik
author_sort Norrman, Karin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Constitutive promoters that ensure sustained and high level gene expression are basic research tools that have a wide range of applications, including studies of human embryology and drug discovery in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). Numerous cellular/viral promoters that ensure sustained gene expression in various cell types have been identified but systematic comparison of their activities in hESCs is still lacking. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We have quantitatively compared promoter activities of five commonly used constitutive promoters, including the human β-actin promoter (ACTB), cytomegalovirus (CMV), elongation factor-1α, (EF1α), phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) and ubiquitinC (UbC) in hESCs. Lentiviral gene transfer was used to ensure stable integration of promoter-eGFP constructs into the hESCs genome. Promoter activities were quantitatively compared in long term culture of undifferentiated hESCs and in their differentiated progenies. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The ACTB, EF1α and PGK promoters showed stable activities during long term culture of undifferentiated hESCs. The ACTB promoter was superior by maintaining expression in 75–80% of the cells after 50 days in culture. During embryoid body (EB) differentiation, promoter activities of all five promoters decreased. Although the EF1α promoter was downregulated in approximately 50% of the cells, it was the most stable promoter during differentiation. Gene expression analysis of differentiated eGFP+ and eGFP- cells indicate that promoter activities might be restricted to specific cell lineages, suggesting the need to carefully select optimal promoters for constitutive gene expression in differentiated hESCs.
format Text
id pubmed-2928720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29287202010-09-23 Quantitative Comparison of Constitutive Promoters in Human ES cells Norrman, Karin Fischer, Yvonne Bonnamy, Blandine Wolfhagen Sand, Fredrik Ravassard, Philippe Semb, Henrik PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Constitutive promoters that ensure sustained and high level gene expression are basic research tools that have a wide range of applications, including studies of human embryology and drug discovery in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). Numerous cellular/viral promoters that ensure sustained gene expression in various cell types have been identified but systematic comparison of their activities in hESCs is still lacking. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We have quantitatively compared promoter activities of five commonly used constitutive promoters, including the human β-actin promoter (ACTB), cytomegalovirus (CMV), elongation factor-1α, (EF1α), phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) and ubiquitinC (UbC) in hESCs. Lentiviral gene transfer was used to ensure stable integration of promoter-eGFP constructs into the hESCs genome. Promoter activities were quantitatively compared in long term culture of undifferentiated hESCs and in their differentiated progenies. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The ACTB, EF1α and PGK promoters showed stable activities during long term culture of undifferentiated hESCs. The ACTB promoter was superior by maintaining expression in 75–80% of the cells after 50 days in culture. During embryoid body (EB) differentiation, promoter activities of all five promoters decreased. Although the EF1α promoter was downregulated in approximately 50% of the cells, it was the most stable promoter during differentiation. Gene expression analysis of differentiated eGFP+ and eGFP- cells indicate that promoter activities might be restricted to specific cell lineages, suggesting the need to carefully select optimal promoters for constitutive gene expression in differentiated hESCs. Public Library of Science 2010-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2928720/ /pubmed/20865032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012413 Text en Norrman et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Norrman, Karin
Fischer, Yvonne
Bonnamy, Blandine
Wolfhagen Sand, Fredrik
Ravassard, Philippe
Semb, Henrik
Quantitative Comparison of Constitutive Promoters in Human ES cells
title Quantitative Comparison of Constitutive Promoters in Human ES cells
title_full Quantitative Comparison of Constitutive Promoters in Human ES cells
title_fullStr Quantitative Comparison of Constitutive Promoters in Human ES cells
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Comparison of Constitutive Promoters in Human ES cells
title_short Quantitative Comparison of Constitutive Promoters in Human ES cells
title_sort quantitative comparison of constitutive promoters in human es cells
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2928720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20865032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012413
work_keys_str_mv AT norrmankarin quantitativecomparisonofconstitutivepromotersinhumanescells
AT fischeryvonne quantitativecomparisonofconstitutivepromotersinhumanescells
AT bonnamyblandine quantitativecomparisonofconstitutivepromotersinhumanescells
AT wolfhagensandfredrik quantitativecomparisonofconstitutivepromotersinhumanescells
AT ravassardphilippe quantitativecomparisonofconstitutivepromotersinhumanescells
AT sembhenrik quantitativecomparisonofconstitutivepromotersinhumanescells