Cargando…
Epistasis: Obstacle or Advantage for Mapping Complex Traits?
Identification of genetic loci in complex traits has focused largely on one-dimensional genome scans to search for associations between single markers and the phenotype. There is mounting evidence that locus interactions, or epistasis, are a crucial component of the genetic architecture of biologica...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2928725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20865037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012264 |
_version_ | 1782185872021520384 |
---|---|
author | Verhoeven, Koen J. F. Casella, George McIntyre, Lauren M. |
author_facet | Verhoeven, Koen J. F. Casella, George McIntyre, Lauren M. |
author_sort | Verhoeven, Koen J. F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Identification of genetic loci in complex traits has focused largely on one-dimensional genome scans to search for associations between single markers and the phenotype. There is mounting evidence that locus interactions, or epistasis, are a crucial component of the genetic architecture of biologically relevant traits. However, epistasis is often viewed as a nuisance factor that reduces power for locus detection. Counter to expectations, recent work shows that fitting full models, instead of testing marker main effect and interaction components separately, in exhaustive multi-locus genome scans can have higher power to detect loci when epistasis is present than single-locus scans, and improvement that comes despite a much larger multiple testing alpha-adjustment in such searches. We demonstrate, both theoretically and via simulation, that the expected power to detect loci when fitting full models is often larger when these loci act epistatically than when they act additively. Additionally, we show that the power for single locus detection may be improved in cases of epistasis compared to the additive model. Our exploration of a two step model selection procedure shows that identifying the true model is difficult. However, this difficulty is certainly not exacerbated by the presence of epistasis, on the contrary, in some cases the presence of epistasis can aid in model selection. The impact of allele frequencies on both power and model selection is dramatic. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2928725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29287252010-09-23 Epistasis: Obstacle or Advantage for Mapping Complex Traits? Verhoeven, Koen J. F. Casella, George McIntyre, Lauren M. PLoS One Research Article Identification of genetic loci in complex traits has focused largely on one-dimensional genome scans to search for associations between single markers and the phenotype. There is mounting evidence that locus interactions, or epistasis, are a crucial component of the genetic architecture of biologically relevant traits. However, epistasis is often viewed as a nuisance factor that reduces power for locus detection. Counter to expectations, recent work shows that fitting full models, instead of testing marker main effect and interaction components separately, in exhaustive multi-locus genome scans can have higher power to detect loci when epistasis is present than single-locus scans, and improvement that comes despite a much larger multiple testing alpha-adjustment in such searches. We demonstrate, both theoretically and via simulation, that the expected power to detect loci when fitting full models is often larger when these loci act epistatically than when they act additively. Additionally, we show that the power for single locus detection may be improved in cases of epistasis compared to the additive model. Our exploration of a two step model selection procedure shows that identifying the true model is difficult. However, this difficulty is certainly not exacerbated by the presence of epistasis, on the contrary, in some cases the presence of epistasis can aid in model selection. The impact of allele frequencies on both power and model selection is dramatic. Public Library of Science 2010-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC2928725/ /pubmed/20865037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012264 Text en Verhoeven et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Verhoeven, Koen J. F. Casella, George McIntyre, Lauren M. Epistasis: Obstacle or Advantage for Mapping Complex Traits? |
title | Epistasis: Obstacle or Advantage for Mapping Complex Traits? |
title_full | Epistasis: Obstacle or Advantage for Mapping Complex Traits? |
title_fullStr | Epistasis: Obstacle or Advantage for Mapping Complex Traits? |
title_full_unstemmed | Epistasis: Obstacle or Advantage for Mapping Complex Traits? |
title_short | Epistasis: Obstacle or Advantage for Mapping Complex Traits? |
title_sort | epistasis: obstacle or advantage for mapping complex traits? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2928725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20865037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012264 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verhoevenkoenjf epistasisobstacleoradvantageformappingcomplextraits AT casellageorge epistasisobstacleoradvantageformappingcomplextraits AT mcintyrelaurenm epistasisobstacleoradvantageformappingcomplextraits |