Cargando…

Proteomics Comparison of Cerebrospinal Fluid of Relapsing Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND: Based on clinical representation of disease symptoms multiple sclerosis (MScl) patients can be divided into two major subtypes; relapsing remitting (RR) MScl (85–90%) and primary progressive (PP) MScl (10–15%). Proteomics analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has detected a number of pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stoop, Marcel P., Singh, Vaibhav, Dekker, Lennard J., Titulaer, Mark K., Stingl, Christoph, Burgers, Peter C., Sillevis Smitt, Peter A. E., Hintzen, Rogier Q., Luider, Theo M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2929207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20805994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012442
_version_ 1782185909626601472
author Stoop, Marcel P.
Singh, Vaibhav
Dekker, Lennard J.
Titulaer, Mark K.
Stingl, Christoph
Burgers, Peter C.
Sillevis Smitt, Peter A. E.
Hintzen, Rogier Q.
Luider, Theo M.
author_facet Stoop, Marcel P.
Singh, Vaibhav
Dekker, Lennard J.
Titulaer, Mark K.
Stingl, Christoph
Burgers, Peter C.
Sillevis Smitt, Peter A. E.
Hintzen, Rogier Q.
Luider, Theo M.
author_sort Stoop, Marcel P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Based on clinical representation of disease symptoms multiple sclerosis (MScl) patients can be divided into two major subtypes; relapsing remitting (RR) MScl (85–90%) and primary progressive (PP) MScl (10–15%). Proteomics analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has detected a number of proteins that were elevated in MScl patients. Here we specifically aimed to differentiate between the PP and RR subtypes of MScl by comparing CSF proteins. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: CSF samples (n = 31) were handled according to the same protocol for quantitative mass spectrometry measurements we reported previously. In the comparison of PP MScl versus RR MScl we observed a number of differentially abundant proteins, such as protein jagged-1 and vitamin D-binding protein. Protein jagged-1 was over three times less abundant in PP MScl compared to RR MScl. Vitamin D-binding protein was only detected in the RR MScl samples. These two proteins were validated by independent techniques (western blot and ELISA) as differentially abundant in the comparison between both MScl types. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The main finding of this comparative study is the observation that the proteome profiles of CSF in PP and RR MScl patients overlap to a large extent. Still, a number of differences could be observed. Protein jagged-1 is a ligand for multiple Notch receptors and involved in the mediation of Notch signaling. It is suggested in literature that the Notch pathway is involved in the remyelination of MScl lesions. Aberration of normal homeostasis of Vitamin D, of which approximately 90% is bound to vitamin D-binding protein, has been widely implicated in MScl for some years now. Vitamin D directly and indirectly regulates the differentiation, activation of CD4+ T-lymphocytes and can prevent the development of autoimmune processes, and so it may be involved in neuroprotective elements in MScl.
format Text
id pubmed-2929207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29292072010-08-30 Proteomics Comparison of Cerebrospinal Fluid of Relapsing Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Stoop, Marcel P. Singh, Vaibhav Dekker, Lennard J. Titulaer, Mark K. Stingl, Christoph Burgers, Peter C. Sillevis Smitt, Peter A. E. Hintzen, Rogier Q. Luider, Theo M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Based on clinical representation of disease symptoms multiple sclerosis (MScl) patients can be divided into two major subtypes; relapsing remitting (RR) MScl (85–90%) and primary progressive (PP) MScl (10–15%). Proteomics analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has detected a number of proteins that were elevated in MScl patients. Here we specifically aimed to differentiate between the PP and RR subtypes of MScl by comparing CSF proteins. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: CSF samples (n = 31) were handled according to the same protocol for quantitative mass spectrometry measurements we reported previously. In the comparison of PP MScl versus RR MScl we observed a number of differentially abundant proteins, such as protein jagged-1 and vitamin D-binding protein. Protein jagged-1 was over three times less abundant in PP MScl compared to RR MScl. Vitamin D-binding protein was only detected in the RR MScl samples. These two proteins were validated by independent techniques (western blot and ELISA) as differentially abundant in the comparison between both MScl types. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The main finding of this comparative study is the observation that the proteome profiles of CSF in PP and RR MScl patients overlap to a large extent. Still, a number of differences could be observed. Protein jagged-1 is a ligand for multiple Notch receptors and involved in the mediation of Notch signaling. It is suggested in literature that the Notch pathway is involved in the remyelination of MScl lesions. Aberration of normal homeostasis of Vitamin D, of which approximately 90% is bound to vitamin D-binding protein, has been widely implicated in MScl for some years now. Vitamin D directly and indirectly regulates the differentiation, activation of CD4+ T-lymphocytes and can prevent the development of autoimmune processes, and so it may be involved in neuroprotective elements in MScl. Public Library of Science 2010-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2929207/ /pubmed/20805994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012442 Text en Stoop et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stoop, Marcel P.
Singh, Vaibhav
Dekker, Lennard J.
Titulaer, Mark K.
Stingl, Christoph
Burgers, Peter C.
Sillevis Smitt, Peter A. E.
Hintzen, Rogier Q.
Luider, Theo M.
Proteomics Comparison of Cerebrospinal Fluid of Relapsing Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
title Proteomics Comparison of Cerebrospinal Fluid of Relapsing Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
title_full Proteomics Comparison of Cerebrospinal Fluid of Relapsing Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
title_fullStr Proteomics Comparison of Cerebrospinal Fluid of Relapsing Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Proteomics Comparison of Cerebrospinal Fluid of Relapsing Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
title_short Proteomics Comparison of Cerebrospinal Fluid of Relapsing Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
title_sort proteomics comparison of cerebrospinal fluid of relapsing remitting and primary progressive multiple sclerosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2929207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20805994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012442
work_keys_str_mv AT stoopmarcelp proteomicscomparisonofcerebrospinalfluidofrelapsingremittingandprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT singhvaibhav proteomicscomparisonofcerebrospinalfluidofrelapsingremittingandprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT dekkerlennardj proteomicscomparisonofcerebrospinalfluidofrelapsingremittingandprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT titulaermarkk proteomicscomparisonofcerebrospinalfluidofrelapsingremittingandprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT stinglchristoph proteomicscomparisonofcerebrospinalfluidofrelapsingremittingandprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT burgerspeterc proteomicscomparisonofcerebrospinalfluidofrelapsingremittingandprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT sillevissmittpeterae proteomicscomparisonofcerebrospinalfluidofrelapsingremittingandprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT hintzenrogierq proteomicscomparisonofcerebrospinalfluidofrelapsingremittingandprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT luidertheom proteomicscomparisonofcerebrospinalfluidofrelapsingremittingandprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis