Cargando…

Comparison of Four Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods for the Rapid Detection of Human Fecal Pollution in Marine and Inland Waters

We compared the effectiveness of three PCR protocols for the detection of Bifidobacterium adolescentis and one PCR protocol for detecting Bacteroidales as indicators of human fecal pollution in environmental samples. Quantitative PCR indicated that a higher concentration of B. adolescentis DNA was r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bachoon, Dave S., Miller, Cortney M., Green, Christen P., Otero, Ernesto
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2929603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20811614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/595692
_version_ 1782185946899283968
author Bachoon, Dave S.
Miller, Cortney M.
Green, Christen P.
Otero, Ernesto
author_facet Bachoon, Dave S.
Miller, Cortney M.
Green, Christen P.
Otero, Ernesto
author_sort Bachoon, Dave S.
collection PubMed
description We compared the effectiveness of three PCR protocols for the detection of Bifidobacterium adolescentis and one PCR protocol for detecting Bacteroidales as indicators of human fecal pollution in environmental samples. Quantitative PCR indicated that a higher concentration of B. adolescentis DNA was recovered from sewage samples on the 0.2 μm filters compared to the 0.45 μm filters, and there was no evidence of qPCR inhibitors in the DNA extracts. With the Matsuki method (1999), B. adolescentis was detected only in undiluted sewage samples. The King method (2007) performed well and detected B. adolescentis in all of the sewage dilutions (from undiluted to 10(−4)). In contrast, the Bonjoch approach (2004) was effective at detecting B. adolescentis at lower dilutions (10(−3)) of sewage samples and it gave false positive results with some (3/8) pig fecal samples. Human-specific Bacteroidales (HuBacs) were detected in the lower diluents of sewage samples but was positive in pig (6/8) and cattle fecal samples. PCR detection of B. adolescentis in marine samples from Puerto Rico and freshwater samples from Georgia indicated that the PCR method of King et al. (2007) and the modified Layton method for HuBac were in agreement in detecting human fecal pollution in most sites.
format Text
id pubmed-2929603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29296032010-09-01 Comparison of Four Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods for the Rapid Detection of Human Fecal Pollution in Marine and Inland Waters Bachoon, Dave S. Miller, Cortney M. Green, Christen P. Otero, Ernesto Int J Microbiol Research Article We compared the effectiveness of three PCR protocols for the detection of Bifidobacterium adolescentis and one PCR protocol for detecting Bacteroidales as indicators of human fecal pollution in environmental samples. Quantitative PCR indicated that a higher concentration of B. adolescentis DNA was recovered from sewage samples on the 0.2 μm filters compared to the 0.45 μm filters, and there was no evidence of qPCR inhibitors in the DNA extracts. With the Matsuki method (1999), B. adolescentis was detected only in undiluted sewage samples. The King method (2007) performed well and detected B. adolescentis in all of the sewage dilutions (from undiluted to 10(−4)). In contrast, the Bonjoch approach (2004) was effective at detecting B. adolescentis at lower dilutions (10(−3)) of sewage samples and it gave false positive results with some (3/8) pig fecal samples. Human-specific Bacteroidales (HuBacs) were detected in the lower diluents of sewage samples but was positive in pig (6/8) and cattle fecal samples. PCR detection of B. adolescentis in marine samples from Puerto Rico and freshwater samples from Georgia indicated that the PCR method of King et al. (2007) and the modified Layton method for HuBac were in agreement in detecting human fecal pollution in most sites. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010 2010-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2929603/ /pubmed/20811614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/595692 Text en Copyright © 2010 Dave S. Bachoon et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bachoon, Dave S.
Miller, Cortney M.
Green, Christen P.
Otero, Ernesto
Comparison of Four Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods for the Rapid Detection of Human Fecal Pollution in Marine and Inland Waters
title Comparison of Four Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods for the Rapid Detection of Human Fecal Pollution in Marine and Inland Waters
title_full Comparison of Four Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods for the Rapid Detection of Human Fecal Pollution in Marine and Inland Waters
title_fullStr Comparison of Four Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods for the Rapid Detection of Human Fecal Pollution in Marine and Inland Waters
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Four Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods for the Rapid Detection of Human Fecal Pollution in Marine and Inland Waters
title_short Comparison of Four Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods for the Rapid Detection of Human Fecal Pollution in Marine and Inland Waters
title_sort comparison of four polymerase chain reaction methods for the rapid detection of human fecal pollution in marine and inland waters
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2929603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20811614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/595692
work_keys_str_mv AT bachoondaves comparisonoffourpolymerasechainreactionmethodsfortherapiddetectionofhumanfecalpollutioninmarineandinlandwaters
AT millercortneym comparisonoffourpolymerasechainreactionmethodsfortherapiddetectionofhumanfecalpollutioninmarineandinlandwaters
AT greenchristenp comparisonoffourpolymerasechainreactionmethodsfortherapiddetectionofhumanfecalpollutioninmarineandinlandwaters
AT oteroernesto comparisonoffourpolymerasechainreactionmethodsfortherapiddetectionofhumanfecalpollutioninmarineandinlandwaters