Cargando…

Determinants of disparities between perceived and physiological risk of falling among elderly people: cohort study

Objectives To gain an understanding of elderly people’s fear of falling by exploring the prevalence and determinants of perceived and physiological fall risk and to understand the role of disparities in perceived and physiological risk in the cause of falls. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delbaere, Kim, Close, Jacqueline C T, Brodaty, Henry, Sachdev, Perminder, Lord, Stephen R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2930273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20724399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4165
_version_ 1782185975992025088
author Delbaere, Kim
Close, Jacqueline C T
Brodaty, Henry
Sachdev, Perminder
Lord, Stephen R
author_facet Delbaere, Kim
Close, Jacqueline C T
Brodaty, Henry
Sachdev, Perminder
Lord, Stephen R
author_sort Delbaere, Kim
collection PubMed
description Objectives To gain an understanding of elderly people’s fear of falling by exploring the prevalence and determinants of perceived and physiological fall risk and to understand the role of disparities in perceived and physiological risk in the cause of falls. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Community sample drawn from eastern Sydney, Australia. Participants 500 men and women aged 70–90 years. Main outcome measures Baseline assessment of medical, physiological, and neuropsychological measures, with physiological fall risk estimated with the physiological profile assessment, and perceived fall risk estimated with the falls efficacy scale international. Participants were followed up monthly for falls over one year. Results Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that perceived and physiological fall risk were both independent predictors of future falls. Classification tree analysis was used to split the sample into four groups (vigorous, anxious, stoic, and aware) based on the disparity between physiological and perceived risk of falling. Perceived fall risk was congruent with physiological fall risk in the vigorous (144 (29%)) and aware (202 (40%)) groups. The anxious group (54 (11%)) had a low physiological risk but high perceived fall risk, which was related to depressive symptoms (P=0.029), neurotic personality traits (P=0.026), and decreased executive functioning (P=0.010). The stoic group (100 (20%)) had a high physiological risk but low perceived fall risk, which was protective for falling and mediated through a positive outlook on life (P=0.001) and maintained physical activity and community participation (P=0.048). Conclusion Many elderly people underestimated or overestimated their risk of falling. Such disparities between perceived and physiological fall risk were primarily associated with psychological measures and strongly influenced the probability of falling. Measures of both physiological and perceived fall risk should be included in fall risk assessments to allow tailoring of interventions for preventing falls in elderly people.
format Text
id pubmed-2930273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29302732010-09-01 Determinants of disparities between perceived and physiological risk of falling among elderly people: cohort study Delbaere, Kim Close, Jacqueline C T Brodaty, Henry Sachdev, Perminder Lord, Stephen R BMJ Research Objectives To gain an understanding of elderly people’s fear of falling by exploring the prevalence and determinants of perceived and physiological fall risk and to understand the role of disparities in perceived and physiological risk in the cause of falls. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Community sample drawn from eastern Sydney, Australia. Participants 500 men and women aged 70–90 years. Main outcome measures Baseline assessment of medical, physiological, and neuropsychological measures, with physiological fall risk estimated with the physiological profile assessment, and perceived fall risk estimated with the falls efficacy scale international. Participants were followed up monthly for falls over one year. Results Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that perceived and physiological fall risk were both independent predictors of future falls. Classification tree analysis was used to split the sample into four groups (vigorous, anxious, stoic, and aware) based on the disparity between physiological and perceived risk of falling. Perceived fall risk was congruent with physiological fall risk in the vigorous (144 (29%)) and aware (202 (40%)) groups. The anxious group (54 (11%)) had a low physiological risk but high perceived fall risk, which was related to depressive symptoms (P=0.029), neurotic personality traits (P=0.026), and decreased executive functioning (P=0.010). The stoic group (100 (20%)) had a high physiological risk but low perceived fall risk, which was protective for falling and mediated through a positive outlook on life (P=0.001) and maintained physical activity and community participation (P=0.048). Conclusion Many elderly people underestimated or overestimated their risk of falling. Such disparities between perceived and physiological fall risk were primarily associated with psychological measures and strongly influenced the probability of falling. Measures of both physiological and perceived fall risk should be included in fall risk assessments to allow tailoring of interventions for preventing falls in elderly people. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2010-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2930273/ /pubmed/20724399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4165 Text en © Delbaere et al 2010 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Delbaere, Kim
Close, Jacqueline C T
Brodaty, Henry
Sachdev, Perminder
Lord, Stephen R
Determinants of disparities between perceived and physiological risk of falling among elderly people: cohort study
title Determinants of disparities between perceived and physiological risk of falling among elderly people: cohort study
title_full Determinants of disparities between perceived and physiological risk of falling among elderly people: cohort study
title_fullStr Determinants of disparities between perceived and physiological risk of falling among elderly people: cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of disparities between perceived and physiological risk of falling among elderly people: cohort study
title_short Determinants of disparities between perceived and physiological risk of falling among elderly people: cohort study
title_sort determinants of disparities between perceived and physiological risk of falling among elderly people: cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2930273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20724399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4165
work_keys_str_mv AT delbaerekim determinantsofdisparitiesbetweenperceivedandphysiologicalriskoffallingamongelderlypeoplecohortstudy
AT closejacquelinect determinantsofdisparitiesbetweenperceivedandphysiologicalriskoffallingamongelderlypeoplecohortstudy
AT brodatyhenry determinantsofdisparitiesbetweenperceivedandphysiologicalriskoffallingamongelderlypeoplecohortstudy
AT sachdevperminder determinantsofdisparitiesbetweenperceivedandphysiologicalriskoffallingamongelderlypeoplecohortstudy
AT lordstephenr determinantsofdisparitiesbetweenperceivedandphysiologicalriskoffallingamongelderlypeoplecohortstudy