Cargando…

Esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess the influence exerted by the observer's dental specialization and compare patients' opinion with observers' opinion of the esthetics of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone. METHODS: Forty-one adult patients, who were treated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Hae-Lyung, Lee, Jae-Kwan, Um, Heung-Sik, Chang, Beom-Seok
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Periodontology 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2931307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20827328
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2010.40.4.188
_version_ 1782186024782266368
author Cho, Hae-Lyung
Lee, Jae-Kwan
Um, Heung-Sik
Chang, Beom-Seok
author_facet Cho, Hae-Lyung
Lee, Jae-Kwan
Um, Heung-Sik
Chang, Beom-Seok
author_sort Cho, Hae-Lyung
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess the influence exerted by the observer's dental specialization and compare patients' opinion with observers' opinion of the esthetics of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone. METHODS: Forty-one adult patients, who were treated with a single implant in the esthetic zone, were enrolled in this study. Eight observers (2 periodontists, 2 prosthodontists, 2 orthodontists and 2 senior dental students) applied the pink esthetic score (PES)/white esthetic score (WES) to 41 implant-supported single restorations twice with an interval of 4 weeks. We used a visual analog scale (VAS) to assess the patient's satisfaction with the treatment outcome from an esthetic point of view. RESULTS: In the PES/WES, very good and moderate intraobserver agreements were noted between the first and second rating. The mean total PES/WES was 11.19 ± 3.59. The mean PES was 5.17 ± 2.29 and mean WES was 6.02 ± 1.96. In the total PES/WES, the difference between the groups was not significant. However, in the WES, the difference between the groups was significant and prosthodontists were found to have assigned poorer ratings than the other groups. Periodontists gave higher ratings than prosthodontists and senior dental students. Orthodontists were clearly more critical than the other observers. The statistical analysis revealed statistically significant correlation between patients' esthetic perception and dentists' perception of the anterior tooth. However, the correlation between the total PES/WES and the VAS score for the first premolar was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The PES/WES is an objective tool in rating the esthetics of implant supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues. Orthodontists were the most critical observers, while periodontists were more generous than other observers. The statistical analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between patients' esthetic perception and dentists' perception of the anterior tooth.
format Text
id pubmed-2931307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Korean Academy of Periodontology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29313072010-09-08 Esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone Cho, Hae-Lyung Lee, Jae-Kwan Um, Heung-Sik Chang, Beom-Seok J Periodontal Implant Sci Research Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess the influence exerted by the observer's dental specialization and compare patients' opinion with observers' opinion of the esthetics of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone. METHODS: Forty-one adult patients, who were treated with a single implant in the esthetic zone, were enrolled in this study. Eight observers (2 periodontists, 2 prosthodontists, 2 orthodontists and 2 senior dental students) applied the pink esthetic score (PES)/white esthetic score (WES) to 41 implant-supported single restorations twice with an interval of 4 weeks. We used a visual analog scale (VAS) to assess the patient's satisfaction with the treatment outcome from an esthetic point of view. RESULTS: In the PES/WES, very good and moderate intraobserver agreements were noted between the first and second rating. The mean total PES/WES was 11.19 ± 3.59. The mean PES was 5.17 ± 2.29 and mean WES was 6.02 ± 1.96. In the total PES/WES, the difference between the groups was not significant. However, in the WES, the difference between the groups was significant and prosthodontists were found to have assigned poorer ratings than the other groups. Periodontists gave higher ratings than prosthodontists and senior dental students. Orthodontists were clearly more critical than the other observers. The statistical analysis revealed statistically significant correlation between patients' esthetic perception and dentists' perception of the anterior tooth. However, the correlation between the total PES/WES and the VAS score for the first premolar was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The PES/WES is an objective tool in rating the esthetics of implant supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues. Orthodontists were the most critical observers, while periodontists were more generous than other observers. The statistical analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between patients' esthetic perception and dentists' perception of the anterior tooth. Korean Academy of Periodontology 2010-08 2010-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2931307/ /pubmed/20827328 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2010.40.4.188 Text en Copyright © 2010 Korean Academy of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Cho, Hae-Lyung
Lee, Jae-Kwan
Um, Heung-Sik
Chang, Beom-Seok
Esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone
title Esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone
title_full Esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone
title_fullStr Esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone
title_full_unstemmed Esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone
title_short Esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone
title_sort esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2931307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20827328
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2010.40.4.188
work_keys_str_mv AT chohaelyung estheticevaluationofmaxillarysingletoothimplantsintheestheticzone
AT leejaekwan estheticevaluationofmaxillarysingletoothimplantsintheestheticzone
AT umheungsik estheticevaluationofmaxillarysingletoothimplantsintheestheticzone
AT changbeomseok estheticevaluationofmaxillarysingletoothimplantsintheestheticzone