Cargando…

Arm-in-cage testing of natural human-derived mosquito repellents

BACKGROUND: Individual human subjects are differentially attractive to mosquitoes and other biting insects. Previous investigations have demonstrated that this can be attributed partly to enhanced production of natural repellent chemicals by those individuals that attract few mosquitoes in the labor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Logan, James G, Stanczyk, Nina M, Hassanali, Ahmed, Kemei, Joshua, Santana, Antônio EG, Ribeiro, Karlos AL, Pickett, John A, Mordue (Luntz), A Jennifer
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2931528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20727149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-239
_version_ 1782186058355572736
author Logan, James G
Stanczyk, Nina M
Hassanali, Ahmed
Kemei, Joshua
Santana, Antônio EG
Ribeiro, Karlos AL
Pickett, John A
Mordue (Luntz), A Jennifer
author_facet Logan, James G
Stanczyk, Nina M
Hassanali, Ahmed
Kemei, Joshua
Santana, Antônio EG
Ribeiro, Karlos AL
Pickett, John A
Mordue (Luntz), A Jennifer
author_sort Logan, James G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individual human subjects are differentially attractive to mosquitoes and other biting insects. Previous investigations have demonstrated that this can be attributed partly to enhanced production of natural repellent chemicals by those individuals that attract few mosquitoes in the laboratory. The most important compounds in this respect include three aldehydes, octanal, nonanal and decanal, and two ketones, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one and geranylacetone [(E)-6,10-dimethylundeca-5,9-dien-2-one]. In olfactometer trials, these compounds interfered with attraction of mosquitoes to a host and consequently show promise as novel mosquito repellents. METHODS: To test whether these chemicals could provide protection against mosquitoes, laboratory repellency trials were carried out to test the chemicals individually at different concentrations and in different mixtures and ratios with three major disease vectors: Anopheles gambiae, Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti. RESULTS: Up to 100% repellency was achieved depending on the type of repellent compound tested, the concentration and the relative composition of the mixture. The greatest effect was observed by mixing together two compounds, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one and geranylacetone in a 1:1 ratio. This mixture exceeded the repellency of DEET when presented at low concentrations. The repellent effect of this mixture was maintained over several hours. Altering the ratio of these compounds significantly affected the behavioural response of the mosquitoes, providing evidence for the ability of mosquitoes to detect and respond to specific mixtures and ratios of natural repellent compounds that are associated with host location. CONCLUSION: The optimum mixture of 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one and geranylacetone was a 1:1 ratio and this provided the most effective protection against all species of mosquito tested. With further improvements in formulation, selected blends of these compounds have the potential to be exploited and developed as human-derived novel repellents for personal protection.
format Text
id pubmed-2931528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29315282010-09-02 Arm-in-cage testing of natural human-derived mosquito repellents Logan, James G Stanczyk, Nina M Hassanali, Ahmed Kemei, Joshua Santana, Antônio EG Ribeiro, Karlos AL Pickett, John A Mordue (Luntz), A Jennifer Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Individual human subjects are differentially attractive to mosquitoes and other biting insects. Previous investigations have demonstrated that this can be attributed partly to enhanced production of natural repellent chemicals by those individuals that attract few mosquitoes in the laboratory. The most important compounds in this respect include three aldehydes, octanal, nonanal and decanal, and two ketones, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one and geranylacetone [(E)-6,10-dimethylundeca-5,9-dien-2-one]. In olfactometer trials, these compounds interfered with attraction of mosquitoes to a host and consequently show promise as novel mosquito repellents. METHODS: To test whether these chemicals could provide protection against mosquitoes, laboratory repellency trials were carried out to test the chemicals individually at different concentrations and in different mixtures and ratios with three major disease vectors: Anopheles gambiae, Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti. RESULTS: Up to 100% repellency was achieved depending on the type of repellent compound tested, the concentration and the relative composition of the mixture. The greatest effect was observed by mixing together two compounds, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one and geranylacetone in a 1:1 ratio. This mixture exceeded the repellency of DEET when presented at low concentrations. The repellent effect of this mixture was maintained over several hours. Altering the ratio of these compounds significantly affected the behavioural response of the mosquitoes, providing evidence for the ability of mosquitoes to detect and respond to specific mixtures and ratios of natural repellent compounds that are associated with host location. CONCLUSION: The optimum mixture of 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one and geranylacetone was a 1:1 ratio and this provided the most effective protection against all species of mosquito tested. With further improvements in formulation, selected blends of these compounds have the potential to be exploited and developed as human-derived novel repellents for personal protection. BioMed Central 2010-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2931528/ /pubmed/20727149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-239 Text en Copyright ©2010 Logan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Logan, James G
Stanczyk, Nina M
Hassanali, Ahmed
Kemei, Joshua
Santana, Antônio EG
Ribeiro, Karlos AL
Pickett, John A
Mordue (Luntz), A Jennifer
Arm-in-cage testing of natural human-derived mosquito repellents
title Arm-in-cage testing of natural human-derived mosquito repellents
title_full Arm-in-cage testing of natural human-derived mosquito repellents
title_fullStr Arm-in-cage testing of natural human-derived mosquito repellents
title_full_unstemmed Arm-in-cage testing of natural human-derived mosquito repellents
title_short Arm-in-cage testing of natural human-derived mosquito repellents
title_sort arm-in-cage testing of natural human-derived mosquito repellents
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2931528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20727149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-239
work_keys_str_mv AT loganjamesg armincagetestingofnaturalhumanderivedmosquitorepellents
AT stanczykninam armincagetestingofnaturalhumanderivedmosquitorepellents
AT hassanaliahmed armincagetestingofnaturalhumanderivedmosquitorepellents
AT kemeijoshua armincagetestingofnaturalhumanderivedmosquitorepellents
AT santanaantonioeg armincagetestingofnaturalhumanderivedmosquitorepellents
AT ribeirokarlosal armincagetestingofnaturalhumanderivedmosquitorepellents
AT pickettjohna armincagetestingofnaturalhumanderivedmosquitorepellents
AT mordueluntzajennifer armincagetestingofnaturalhumanderivedmosquitorepellents