Cargando…
Deficiencies in social relationships of individuals with neurosis
BACKGROUND: Social interaction and network of individuals with neurosis have been reported to be inadequate. AIM: To measure deficiencies in the social network of individuals with neurosis. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with neurosis attending the OPD of the Department of Psychiatry, King Geor...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2932985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20844645 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.31578 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Social interaction and network of individuals with neurosis have been reported to be inadequate. AIM: To measure deficiencies in the social network of individuals with neurosis. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with neurosis attending the OPD of the Department of Psychiatry, King George's Medical College, Lucknow, who were diagnosed as per the criteria of ICD-9, were included in the study. A control group of 40 healthy persons matched for age, sex, education and marital status was also taken. Interaction with the primary group (defined as consisting of all kin, nominated friends, work associates and neighbours) was measured by the Social Interaction Schedule of Henderson et al. as modified for the Indian population. RESULTS: Patients reported significantly higher mean duration of unpleasant but affectively intense interaction with one person within or outside the primary group and affectively unpleasant and intense interaction with more than one person within or outside the primary group or affectively superficial but unpleasant interaction with one or more person of the primary group. Healthy subjects reported more of pleasant interaction with one person within or outside the primary group and affectively intense and pleasant interaction with more than one person within or outside the primary group or affectively superficial but pleasant interaction with one or more persons of the primary group; the difference was statistically significant as compared to patients with neurosis. CONCLUSION: The primary group of patients with neurosis was significantly smaller in numerical size as compared with that of controls and in terms of the total time spent with members of the primary group, patients with neurosis reported more interactions of unpleasant type and less of pleasant type as compared with healthy controls. |
---|