Cargando…

Utilization of Electrocardiographic P-wave Duration for AV Interval Optimization in Dual-Chamber Pacemakers

BACKGROUND: Empiric programming of the atrio-ventricular (AV) delay is commonly performed during pacemaker implantation. Transmitral flow assessment by Doppler echocardiography can be used to find the optimal AV delay by Ritter's method, but this cannot easily be performed during pacemaker impl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sorajja, Dan, Bhakta, Mayurkumar D, Scott, Luis RP, Altemose, Gregory T, Srivathsan, Komandoor
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Indian Heart Rhythm Society 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20930956
_version_ 1782186130183028736
author Sorajja, Dan
Bhakta, Mayurkumar D
Scott, Luis RP
Altemose, Gregory T
Srivathsan, Komandoor
author_facet Sorajja, Dan
Bhakta, Mayurkumar D
Scott, Luis RP
Altemose, Gregory T
Srivathsan, Komandoor
author_sort Sorajja, Dan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Empiric programming of the atrio-ventricular (AV) delay is commonly performed during pacemaker implantation. Transmitral flow assessment by Doppler echocardiography can be used to find the optimal AV delay by Ritter's method, but this cannot easily be performed during pacemaker implantation. We sought to determine a non-invasive surrogate for this assessment. Since electrocardiographic P-wave duration estimates atrial activation time, we hypothesized this measurement may provide a more appropriate basis for programming AV intervals. METHODS: A total of 19 patients were examined at the time of dual chamber pacemaker implantation, 13 (68%) being male with a mean age of 77. Each patient had the optimal AV interval determined by Ritter's method. The P-wave duration was measured independently on electrocardiograms using MUSE® Cardiology Information System (version 7.1.1). The relationship between P-wave duration and the optimal AV interval was analyzed. RESULTS: The P-wave duration and optimal AV delay were related by a correlation coefficient of 0.815 and a correction factor of 1.26. The mean BMI was 27. The presence of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and valvular heart disease was 13 (68%), 3 (16%), and 2 (11%) respectively. Mean echocardiographic parameters included an ejection fraction of 58%, left atrial index of 32 ml/m(2), and diastolic dysfunction grade 1 (out of 4). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with dual chamber pacemakers in AV sequentially paced mode and normal EF, electrocardiographic P-wave duration correlates to the optimal AV delay by Ritter's method by a factor of 1.26.
format Text
id pubmed-2933366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Indian Heart Rhythm Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29333662010-10-07 Utilization of Electrocardiographic P-wave Duration for AV Interval Optimization in Dual-Chamber Pacemakers Sorajja, Dan Bhakta, Mayurkumar D Scott, Luis RP Altemose, Gregory T Srivathsan, Komandoor Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Original Article BACKGROUND: Empiric programming of the atrio-ventricular (AV) delay is commonly performed during pacemaker implantation. Transmitral flow assessment by Doppler echocardiography can be used to find the optimal AV delay by Ritter's method, but this cannot easily be performed during pacemaker implantation. We sought to determine a non-invasive surrogate for this assessment. Since electrocardiographic P-wave duration estimates atrial activation time, we hypothesized this measurement may provide a more appropriate basis for programming AV intervals. METHODS: A total of 19 patients were examined at the time of dual chamber pacemaker implantation, 13 (68%) being male with a mean age of 77. Each patient had the optimal AV interval determined by Ritter's method. The P-wave duration was measured independently on electrocardiograms using MUSE® Cardiology Information System (version 7.1.1). The relationship between P-wave duration and the optimal AV interval was analyzed. RESULTS: The P-wave duration and optimal AV delay were related by a correlation coefficient of 0.815 and a correction factor of 1.26. The mean BMI was 27. The presence of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and valvular heart disease was 13 (68%), 3 (16%), and 2 (11%) respectively. Mean echocardiographic parameters included an ejection fraction of 58%, left atrial index of 32 ml/m(2), and diastolic dysfunction grade 1 (out of 4). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with dual chamber pacemakers in AV sequentially paced mode and normal EF, electrocardiographic P-wave duration correlates to the optimal AV delay by Ritter's method by a factor of 1.26. Indian Heart Rhythm Society 2010-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2933366/ /pubmed/20930956 Text en Copyright: © 2010 Sorajja et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sorajja, Dan
Bhakta, Mayurkumar D
Scott, Luis RP
Altemose, Gregory T
Srivathsan, Komandoor
Utilization of Electrocardiographic P-wave Duration for AV Interval Optimization in Dual-Chamber Pacemakers
title Utilization of Electrocardiographic P-wave Duration for AV Interval Optimization in Dual-Chamber Pacemakers
title_full Utilization of Electrocardiographic P-wave Duration for AV Interval Optimization in Dual-Chamber Pacemakers
title_fullStr Utilization of Electrocardiographic P-wave Duration for AV Interval Optimization in Dual-Chamber Pacemakers
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of Electrocardiographic P-wave Duration for AV Interval Optimization in Dual-Chamber Pacemakers
title_short Utilization of Electrocardiographic P-wave Duration for AV Interval Optimization in Dual-Chamber Pacemakers
title_sort utilization of electrocardiographic p-wave duration for av interval optimization in dual-chamber pacemakers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20930956
work_keys_str_mv AT sorajjadan utilizationofelectrocardiographicpwavedurationforavintervaloptimizationindualchamberpacemakers
AT bhaktamayurkumard utilizationofelectrocardiographicpwavedurationforavintervaloptimizationindualchamberpacemakers
AT scottluisrp utilizationofelectrocardiographicpwavedurationforavintervaloptimizationindualchamberpacemakers
AT altemosegregoryt utilizationofelectrocardiographicpwavedurationforavintervaloptimizationindualchamberpacemakers
AT srivathsankomandoor utilizationofelectrocardiographicpwavedurationforavintervaloptimizationindualchamberpacemakers