Cargando…

A comparison of physicians and medical assistants in interpreting verbal autopsy interviews for allocating cause of neonatal death in Matlab, Bangladesh: can medical assistants be considered an alternative to physicians?

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the agreement between medical physicians in their interpretation of verbal autopsy (VA) interview data for identifying causes of neonatal deaths in rural Bangladesh. METHODS: The study was carried out in Matlab, a rural sub-district in eastern Bangladesh. Trained perso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chowdhury, Hafizur R, Thompson, Sandra C, Ali, Mohammed, Alam , Nurul, Yunus , Mohammed, Streatfield , Peter K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20712906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-8-23
_version_ 1782186150928056320
author Chowdhury, Hafizur R
Thompson, Sandra C
Ali, Mohammed
Alam , Nurul
Yunus , Mohammed
Streatfield , Peter K
author_facet Chowdhury, Hafizur R
Thompson, Sandra C
Ali, Mohammed
Alam , Nurul
Yunus , Mohammed
Streatfield , Peter K
author_sort Chowdhury, Hafizur R
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the agreement between medical physicians in their interpretation of verbal autopsy (VA) interview data for identifying causes of neonatal deaths in rural Bangladesh. METHODS: The study was carried out in Matlab, a rural sub-district in eastern Bangladesh. Trained persons conducted the VA interview with the mother or another family member at the home of the deceased. Three physicians and a medical assistant independently reviewed the VA interviews to assign causes of death using the International Classification of Diseases - Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. A physician assigned cause was decided when at least two physicians agreed on a cause of death. Cause-specific mortality fraction (CSMF), kappa (k) statistic, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were applied to compare agreement between the reviewers. RESULTS: Of the 365 neonatal deaths reviewed, agreement on a direct cause of death was reached by at least two physicians in 339 (93%) of cases. Physician and medical assistant reviews of causes of death demonstrated the following levels of diagnostic agreement for the main causes of deaths: for birth asphyxia the sensitivity was 84%, specificity 93%, and kappa 0.77. For prematurity/low birth weight, the sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistics were, respectively, 53%, 96%, and 0.55, for sepsis/meningitis they were 48%, 98%, and 0.53, and for pneumonia they were 75%, 94%, and 0.51. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a moderate to strong agreement between physician- assigned and medical assistant- assigned major causes of neonatal death. A well-trained medical assistant could be considered an alternative for assigning major causes of neonatal deaths in rural Bangladesh and in similar settings where physicians are scarce and their time costs more. A validation study with medically confirmed diagnosis will improve the performance of VA for assigning cause of neonatal death.
format Text
id pubmed-2933579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29335792010-09-07 A comparison of physicians and medical assistants in interpreting verbal autopsy interviews for allocating cause of neonatal death in Matlab, Bangladesh: can medical assistants be considered an alternative to physicians? Chowdhury, Hafizur R Thompson, Sandra C Ali, Mohammed Alam , Nurul Yunus , Mohammed Streatfield , Peter K Popul Health Metr Research OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the agreement between medical physicians in their interpretation of verbal autopsy (VA) interview data for identifying causes of neonatal deaths in rural Bangladesh. METHODS: The study was carried out in Matlab, a rural sub-district in eastern Bangladesh. Trained persons conducted the VA interview with the mother or another family member at the home of the deceased. Three physicians and a medical assistant independently reviewed the VA interviews to assign causes of death using the International Classification of Diseases - Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. A physician assigned cause was decided when at least two physicians agreed on a cause of death. Cause-specific mortality fraction (CSMF), kappa (k) statistic, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were applied to compare agreement between the reviewers. RESULTS: Of the 365 neonatal deaths reviewed, agreement on a direct cause of death was reached by at least two physicians in 339 (93%) of cases. Physician and medical assistant reviews of causes of death demonstrated the following levels of diagnostic agreement for the main causes of deaths: for birth asphyxia the sensitivity was 84%, specificity 93%, and kappa 0.77. For prematurity/low birth weight, the sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistics were, respectively, 53%, 96%, and 0.55, for sepsis/meningitis they were 48%, 98%, and 0.53, and for pneumonia they were 75%, 94%, and 0.51. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a moderate to strong agreement between physician- assigned and medical assistant- assigned major causes of neonatal death. A well-trained medical assistant could be considered an alternative for assigning major causes of neonatal deaths in rural Bangladesh and in similar settings where physicians are scarce and their time costs more. A validation study with medically confirmed diagnosis will improve the performance of VA for assigning cause of neonatal death. BioMed Central 2010-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2933579/ /pubmed/20712906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-8-23 Text en Copyright ©2010 Chowdhury et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Chowdhury, Hafizur R
Thompson, Sandra C
Ali, Mohammed
Alam , Nurul
Yunus , Mohammed
Streatfield , Peter K
A comparison of physicians and medical assistants in interpreting verbal autopsy interviews for allocating cause of neonatal death in Matlab, Bangladesh: can medical assistants be considered an alternative to physicians?
title A comparison of physicians and medical assistants in interpreting verbal autopsy interviews for allocating cause of neonatal death in Matlab, Bangladesh: can medical assistants be considered an alternative to physicians?
title_full A comparison of physicians and medical assistants in interpreting verbal autopsy interviews for allocating cause of neonatal death in Matlab, Bangladesh: can medical assistants be considered an alternative to physicians?
title_fullStr A comparison of physicians and medical assistants in interpreting verbal autopsy interviews for allocating cause of neonatal death in Matlab, Bangladesh: can medical assistants be considered an alternative to physicians?
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of physicians and medical assistants in interpreting verbal autopsy interviews for allocating cause of neonatal death in Matlab, Bangladesh: can medical assistants be considered an alternative to physicians?
title_short A comparison of physicians and medical assistants in interpreting verbal autopsy interviews for allocating cause of neonatal death in Matlab, Bangladesh: can medical assistants be considered an alternative to physicians?
title_sort comparison of physicians and medical assistants in interpreting verbal autopsy interviews for allocating cause of neonatal death in matlab, bangladesh: can medical assistants be considered an alternative to physicians?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20712906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-8-23
work_keys_str_mv AT chowdhuryhafizurr acomparisonofphysiciansandmedicalassistantsininterpretingverbalautopsyinterviewsforallocatingcauseofneonataldeathinmatlabbangladeshcanmedicalassistantsbeconsideredanalternativetophysicians
AT thompsonsandrac acomparisonofphysiciansandmedicalassistantsininterpretingverbalautopsyinterviewsforallocatingcauseofneonataldeathinmatlabbangladeshcanmedicalassistantsbeconsideredanalternativetophysicians
AT alimohammed acomparisonofphysiciansandmedicalassistantsininterpretingverbalautopsyinterviewsforallocatingcauseofneonataldeathinmatlabbangladeshcanmedicalassistantsbeconsideredanalternativetophysicians
AT alamnurul acomparisonofphysiciansandmedicalassistantsininterpretingverbalautopsyinterviewsforallocatingcauseofneonataldeathinmatlabbangladeshcanmedicalassistantsbeconsideredanalternativetophysicians
AT yunusmohammed acomparisonofphysiciansandmedicalassistantsininterpretingverbalautopsyinterviewsforallocatingcauseofneonataldeathinmatlabbangladeshcanmedicalassistantsbeconsideredanalternativetophysicians
AT streatfieldpeterk acomparisonofphysiciansandmedicalassistantsininterpretingverbalautopsyinterviewsforallocatingcauseofneonataldeathinmatlabbangladeshcanmedicalassistantsbeconsideredanalternativetophysicians
AT chowdhuryhafizurr comparisonofphysiciansandmedicalassistantsininterpretingverbalautopsyinterviewsforallocatingcauseofneonataldeathinmatlabbangladeshcanmedicalassistantsbeconsideredanalternativetophysicians
AT thompsonsandrac comparisonofphysiciansandmedicalassistantsininterpretingverbalautopsyinterviewsforallocatingcauseofneonataldeathinmatlabbangladeshcanmedicalassistantsbeconsideredanalternativetophysicians
AT alimohammed comparisonofphysiciansandmedicalassistantsininterpretingverbalautopsyinterviewsforallocatingcauseofneonataldeathinmatlabbangladeshcanmedicalassistantsbeconsideredanalternativetophysicians
AT alamnurul comparisonofphysiciansandmedicalassistantsininterpretingverbalautopsyinterviewsforallocatingcauseofneonataldeathinmatlabbangladeshcanmedicalassistantsbeconsideredanalternativetophysicians
AT yunusmohammed comparisonofphysiciansandmedicalassistantsininterpretingverbalautopsyinterviewsforallocatingcauseofneonataldeathinmatlabbangladeshcanmedicalassistantsbeconsideredanalternativetophysicians
AT streatfieldpeterk comparisonofphysiciansandmedicalassistantsininterpretingverbalautopsyinterviewsforallocatingcauseofneonataldeathinmatlabbangladeshcanmedicalassistantsbeconsideredanalternativetophysicians