Cargando…

Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model

BACKGROUND: Historically, radiographs, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) exams, palpation and histology have been used to assess fusions in a mouse spine. The objective of this study was to develop a faster, cheaper, reproducible test to directly quantify the mechanical integrity of spinal fusion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dewan, Ashvin K, Dewan, Rahul A, Calderon, Nathan, Fuentes, Angie, Lazard, ZaWaunyka, Davis, Alan R, Heggeness, Michael, Hipp, John A, Olmsted-Davis, Elizabeth A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20727195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-5-58
_version_ 1782186177335394304
author Dewan, Ashvin K
Dewan, Rahul A
Calderon, Nathan
Fuentes, Angie
Lazard, ZaWaunyka
Davis, Alan R
Heggeness, Michael
Hipp, John A
Olmsted-Davis, Elizabeth A
author_facet Dewan, Ashvin K
Dewan, Rahul A
Calderon, Nathan
Fuentes, Angie
Lazard, ZaWaunyka
Davis, Alan R
Heggeness, Michael
Hipp, John A
Olmsted-Davis, Elizabeth A
author_sort Dewan, Ashvin K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Historically, radiographs, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) exams, palpation and histology have been used to assess fusions in a mouse spine. The objective of this study was to develop a faster, cheaper, reproducible test to directly quantify the mechanical integrity of spinal fusions in mice. METHODS: Fusions were induced in ten mice spine using a previously described technique of in situ endochondral ossification, harvested with soft tissue, and cast in radiolucent alginate material for handling. Using a validated software package and a customized mechanical apparatus that flexed and extended the spinal column, the amount of intervertebral motion between adjacent vertebral discs was determined with static flexed and extended lateral spine radiographs. Micro-CT images of the same were also blindly reviewed for fusion. RESULTS: Mean intervertebral motion between control, non-fused, spinal vertebral discs was 6.1 ± 0.2° during spine flexion/extension. In fusion samples, adjacent vertebrae with less than 3.5° intervertebral motion had fusions documented by micro-CT inspection. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the amount of intervertebral rotation between vertebrae during spine flexion/extension is a relatively simple, cheap (<$100), clinically relevant, and fast test for assessing the mechanical success of spinal fusion in mice that compared favorably to the standard, micro-CT.
format Text
id pubmed-2933711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29337112010-09-07 Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model Dewan, Ashvin K Dewan, Rahul A Calderon, Nathan Fuentes, Angie Lazard, ZaWaunyka Davis, Alan R Heggeness, Michael Hipp, John A Olmsted-Davis, Elizabeth A J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Historically, radiographs, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) exams, palpation and histology have been used to assess fusions in a mouse spine. The objective of this study was to develop a faster, cheaper, reproducible test to directly quantify the mechanical integrity of spinal fusions in mice. METHODS: Fusions were induced in ten mice spine using a previously described technique of in situ endochondral ossification, harvested with soft tissue, and cast in radiolucent alginate material for handling. Using a validated software package and a customized mechanical apparatus that flexed and extended the spinal column, the amount of intervertebral motion between adjacent vertebral discs was determined with static flexed and extended lateral spine radiographs. Micro-CT images of the same were also blindly reviewed for fusion. RESULTS: Mean intervertebral motion between control, non-fused, spinal vertebral discs was 6.1 ± 0.2° during spine flexion/extension. In fusion samples, adjacent vertebrae with less than 3.5° intervertebral motion had fusions documented by micro-CT inspection. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the amount of intervertebral rotation between vertebrae during spine flexion/extension is a relatively simple, cheap (<$100), clinically relevant, and fast test for assessing the mechanical success of spinal fusion in mice that compared favorably to the standard, micro-CT. BioMed Central 2010-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2933711/ /pubmed/20727195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-5-58 Text en Copyright ©2010 Dewan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dewan, Ashvin K
Dewan, Rahul A
Calderon, Nathan
Fuentes, Angie
Lazard, ZaWaunyka
Davis, Alan R
Heggeness, Michael
Hipp, John A
Olmsted-Davis, Elizabeth A
Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model
title Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model
title_full Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model
title_fullStr Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model
title_full_unstemmed Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model
title_short Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model
title_sort assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20727195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-5-58
work_keys_str_mv AT dewanashvink assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel
AT dewanrahula assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel
AT calderonnathan assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel
AT fuentesangie assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel
AT lazardzawaunyka assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel
AT davisalanr assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel
AT heggenessmichael assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel
AT hippjohna assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel
AT olmsteddaviselizabetha assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel