Cargando…
Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model
BACKGROUND: Historically, radiographs, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) exams, palpation and histology have been used to assess fusions in a mouse spine. The objective of this study was to develop a faster, cheaper, reproducible test to directly quantify the mechanical integrity of spinal fusion...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20727195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-5-58 |
_version_ | 1782186177335394304 |
---|---|
author | Dewan, Ashvin K Dewan, Rahul A Calderon, Nathan Fuentes, Angie Lazard, ZaWaunyka Davis, Alan R Heggeness, Michael Hipp, John A Olmsted-Davis, Elizabeth A |
author_facet | Dewan, Ashvin K Dewan, Rahul A Calderon, Nathan Fuentes, Angie Lazard, ZaWaunyka Davis, Alan R Heggeness, Michael Hipp, John A Olmsted-Davis, Elizabeth A |
author_sort | Dewan, Ashvin K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Historically, radiographs, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) exams, palpation and histology have been used to assess fusions in a mouse spine. The objective of this study was to develop a faster, cheaper, reproducible test to directly quantify the mechanical integrity of spinal fusions in mice. METHODS: Fusions were induced in ten mice spine using a previously described technique of in situ endochondral ossification, harvested with soft tissue, and cast in radiolucent alginate material for handling. Using a validated software package and a customized mechanical apparatus that flexed and extended the spinal column, the amount of intervertebral motion between adjacent vertebral discs was determined with static flexed and extended lateral spine radiographs. Micro-CT images of the same were also blindly reviewed for fusion. RESULTS: Mean intervertebral motion between control, non-fused, spinal vertebral discs was 6.1 ± 0.2° during spine flexion/extension. In fusion samples, adjacent vertebrae with less than 3.5° intervertebral motion had fusions documented by micro-CT inspection. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the amount of intervertebral rotation between vertebrae during spine flexion/extension is a relatively simple, cheap (<$100), clinically relevant, and fast test for assessing the mechanical success of spinal fusion in mice that compared favorably to the standard, micro-CT. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2933711 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29337112010-09-07 Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model Dewan, Ashvin K Dewan, Rahul A Calderon, Nathan Fuentes, Angie Lazard, ZaWaunyka Davis, Alan R Heggeness, Michael Hipp, John A Olmsted-Davis, Elizabeth A J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Historically, radiographs, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) exams, palpation and histology have been used to assess fusions in a mouse spine. The objective of this study was to develop a faster, cheaper, reproducible test to directly quantify the mechanical integrity of spinal fusions in mice. METHODS: Fusions were induced in ten mice spine using a previously described technique of in situ endochondral ossification, harvested with soft tissue, and cast in radiolucent alginate material for handling. Using a validated software package and a customized mechanical apparatus that flexed and extended the spinal column, the amount of intervertebral motion between adjacent vertebral discs was determined with static flexed and extended lateral spine radiographs. Micro-CT images of the same were also blindly reviewed for fusion. RESULTS: Mean intervertebral motion between control, non-fused, spinal vertebral discs was 6.1 ± 0.2° during spine flexion/extension. In fusion samples, adjacent vertebrae with less than 3.5° intervertebral motion had fusions documented by micro-CT inspection. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the amount of intervertebral rotation between vertebrae during spine flexion/extension is a relatively simple, cheap (<$100), clinically relevant, and fast test for assessing the mechanical success of spinal fusion in mice that compared favorably to the standard, micro-CT. BioMed Central 2010-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2933711/ /pubmed/20727195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-5-58 Text en Copyright ©2010 Dewan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dewan, Ashvin K Dewan, Rahul A Calderon, Nathan Fuentes, Angie Lazard, ZaWaunyka Davis, Alan R Heggeness, Michael Hipp, John A Olmsted-Davis, Elizabeth A Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model |
title | Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model |
title_full | Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model |
title_fullStr | Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model |
title_short | Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model |
title_sort | assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20727195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-5-58 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dewanashvink assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel AT dewanrahula assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel AT calderonnathan assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel AT fuentesangie assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel AT lazardzawaunyka assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel AT davisalanr assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel AT heggenessmichael assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel AT hippjohna assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel AT olmsteddaviselizabetha assessingmechanicalintegrityofspinalfusionbyinsituendochondralosteoinductioninthemurinemodel |