Cargando…

Non-Foveal Macular Holes After PPV for Macular Pucker

PURPOSE: To describe six patients (six eyes) who developed an eccentric macular hole after surgery for idiopathic epimacular proliferation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of records from six patients who developed eccentric macular holes postoperatively following vitrectomy in 107 consecutive cases w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abo EL Enin, Mostafa Abdellatif, El-Toukhy, Hesham M, Swelam, Ahmed
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2934718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20844682
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.65499
_version_ 1782186358281863168
author Abo EL Enin, Mostafa Abdellatif
El-Toukhy, Hesham M
Swelam, Ahmed
author_facet Abo EL Enin, Mostafa Abdellatif
El-Toukhy, Hesham M
Swelam, Ahmed
author_sort Abo EL Enin, Mostafa Abdellatif
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To describe six patients (six eyes) who developed an eccentric macular hole after surgery for idiopathic epimacular proliferation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of records from six patients who developed eccentric macular holes postoperatively following vitrectomy in 107 consecutive cases with peeling of the epimacular proliferation and internal limiting membrane (ILM) from June 2004 to January 2009 RESULTS: Eccentric macular holes were developed from nine days to eight months (mean, 3.1 months) after epimacular proliferation peeling. The ILM was peeled in addition to the epimacular proliferation in five of the six cases. Of the six eccentric macular holes, four were located temporal to the fovea, one was located superior to the fovea, and one was located nasal to the fovea. Final visual acuities after a mean follow-up period of 17.3 months were 20/20 in two eyes, 20/25 in one eye, 20/40 in two eyes, and 5/200 in one eye. The eye with the eccentric macular hole nasal to the fovea had the poorest final visual acuity of 5/200. CONCLUSION: Eccentric macular holes occurring after vitrectomy to remove epimacular proliferation is an uncommon postoperative finding. Various explanations have been suggested for the etiology of these holes, but there is no consensus. We suggested that the ILM tear should be initiated with a diamond dusted knife to reduce the likelihood of injury to the underlying Muller cells that may contribute to the formation of eccentric macular holes.
format Text
id pubmed-2934718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29347182010-09-15 Non-Foveal Macular Holes After PPV for Macular Pucker Abo EL Enin, Mostafa Abdellatif El-Toukhy, Hesham M Swelam, Ahmed Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To describe six patients (six eyes) who developed an eccentric macular hole after surgery for idiopathic epimacular proliferation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of records from six patients who developed eccentric macular holes postoperatively following vitrectomy in 107 consecutive cases with peeling of the epimacular proliferation and internal limiting membrane (ILM) from June 2004 to January 2009 RESULTS: Eccentric macular holes were developed from nine days to eight months (mean, 3.1 months) after epimacular proliferation peeling. The ILM was peeled in addition to the epimacular proliferation in five of the six cases. Of the six eccentric macular holes, four were located temporal to the fovea, one was located superior to the fovea, and one was located nasal to the fovea. Final visual acuities after a mean follow-up period of 17.3 months were 20/20 in two eyes, 20/25 in one eye, 20/40 in two eyes, and 5/200 in one eye. The eye with the eccentric macular hole nasal to the fovea had the poorest final visual acuity of 5/200. CONCLUSION: Eccentric macular holes occurring after vitrectomy to remove epimacular proliferation is an uncommon postoperative finding. Various explanations have been suggested for the etiology of these holes, but there is no consensus. We suggested that the ILM tear should be initiated with a diamond dusted knife to reduce the likelihood of injury to the underlying Muller cells that may contribute to the formation of eccentric macular holes. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2934718/ /pubmed/20844682 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.65499 Text en © Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abo EL Enin, Mostafa Abdellatif
El-Toukhy, Hesham M
Swelam, Ahmed
Non-Foveal Macular Holes After PPV for Macular Pucker
title Non-Foveal Macular Holes After PPV for Macular Pucker
title_full Non-Foveal Macular Holes After PPV for Macular Pucker
title_fullStr Non-Foveal Macular Holes After PPV for Macular Pucker
title_full_unstemmed Non-Foveal Macular Holes After PPV for Macular Pucker
title_short Non-Foveal Macular Holes After PPV for Macular Pucker
title_sort non-foveal macular holes after ppv for macular pucker
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2934718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20844682
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.65499
work_keys_str_mv AT aboeleninmostafaabdellatif nonfovealmacularholesafterppvformacularpucker
AT eltoukhyheshamm nonfovealmacularholesafterppvformacularpucker
AT swelamahmed nonfovealmacularholesafterppvformacularpucker