Cargando…

Is too ‘creative’ language acceptable in crystallography?

While figures of speech are often useful and even educational, flashy titles combined with hyperbolae and imprecise language can mislead or deceive non-specialist readers and should therefore be avoided. The possibility of such confusion exists when poorly defined terms like ‘structure quality’ or ‘...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wlodawer, Alexander, Lubkowski, Jacek, Minor, Wladek, Jaskolski, Mariusz
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union of Crystallography 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2935284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20823556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S090744491002799X
_version_ 1782186380927959040
author Wlodawer, Alexander
Lubkowski, Jacek
Minor, Wladek
Jaskolski, Mariusz
author_facet Wlodawer, Alexander
Lubkowski, Jacek
Minor, Wladek
Jaskolski, Mariusz
author_sort Wlodawer, Alexander
collection PubMed
description While figures of speech are often useful and even educational, flashy titles combined with hyperbolae and imprecise language can mislead or deceive non-specialist readers and should therefore be avoided. The possibility of such confusion exists when poorly defined terms like ‘structure quality’ or ‘super-resolution’ are used to describe a protein structure.
format Text
id pubmed-2935284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher International Union of Crystallography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29352842010-09-10 Is too ‘creative’ language acceptable in crystallography? Wlodawer, Alexander Lubkowski, Jacek Minor, Wladek Jaskolski, Mariusz Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr Letters to the Editor While figures of speech are often useful and even educational, flashy titles combined with hyperbolae and imprecise language can mislead or deceive non-specialist readers and should therefore be avoided. The possibility of such confusion exists when poorly defined terms like ‘structure quality’ or ‘super-resolution’ are used to describe a protein structure. International Union of Crystallography 2010-09-01 2010-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2935284/ /pubmed/20823556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S090744491002799X Text en © Wlodawer et al. 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
spellingShingle Letters to the Editor
Wlodawer, Alexander
Lubkowski, Jacek
Minor, Wladek
Jaskolski, Mariusz
Is too ‘creative’ language acceptable in crystallography?
title Is too ‘creative’ language acceptable in crystallography?
title_full Is too ‘creative’ language acceptable in crystallography?
title_fullStr Is too ‘creative’ language acceptable in crystallography?
title_full_unstemmed Is too ‘creative’ language acceptable in crystallography?
title_short Is too ‘creative’ language acceptable in crystallography?
title_sort is too ‘creative’ language acceptable in crystallography?
topic Letters to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2935284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20823556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S090744491002799X
work_keys_str_mv AT wlodaweralexander istoocreativelanguageacceptableincrystallography
AT lubkowskijacek istoocreativelanguageacceptableincrystallography
AT minorwladek istoocreativelanguageacceptableincrystallography
AT jaskolskimariusz istoocreativelanguageacceptableincrystallography