Cargando…

Major Radiodiagnostic Imaging in Pregnancy and the Risk of Childhood Malignancy: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Ontario

BACKGROUND: The association between fetal exposure to major radiodiagnostic testing in pregnancy—computed tomography (CT) and radionuclide imaging—and the risk of childhood cancer is not established. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We completed a population-based study of 1.8 million maternal-child pairs in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ray, Joel G., Schull, Michael J., Urquia, Marcelo L., You, John J., Guttmann, Astrid, Vermeulen, Marian J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2935460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20838660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000337
_version_ 1782186408231829504
author Ray, Joel G.
Schull, Michael J.
Urquia, Marcelo L.
You, John J.
Guttmann, Astrid
Vermeulen, Marian J.
author_facet Ray, Joel G.
Schull, Michael J.
Urquia, Marcelo L.
You, John J.
Guttmann, Astrid
Vermeulen, Marian J.
author_sort Ray, Joel G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The association between fetal exposure to major radiodiagnostic testing in pregnancy—computed tomography (CT) and radionuclide imaging—and the risk of childhood cancer is not established. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We completed a population-based study of 1.8 million maternal-child pairs in the province of Ontario, from 1991 to 2008. We used Ontario's universal health care–linked administrative databases to identify all term obstetrical deliveries and newborn records, inpatient and outpatient major radiodiagnostic services, as well as all children with a malignancy after birth. There were 5,590 mothers exposed to major radiodiagnostic testing in pregnancy (3.0 per 1,000) and 1,829,927 mothers not exposed. The rate of radiodiagnostic testing increased from 1.1 to 6.3 per 1,000 pregnancies over the study period; about 73% of tests were CT scans. After a median duration of follow-up of 8.9 years, four childhood cancers arose in the exposed group (1.13 per 10,000 person-years) and 2,539 cancers in the unexposed group (1.56 per 10,000 person-years), a crude hazard ratio of 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.26–1.82). After adjusting for maternal age, income quintile, urban status, and maternal cancer, as well as infant sex, chromosomal or congenital anomalies, and major radiodiagnostic test exposure after birth, the risk was essentially unchanged (hazard ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.25–1.80). CONCLUSIONS: Although major radiodiagnostic testing is now performed in about 1 in 160 pregnancies in Ontario, the absolute annual risk of childhood malignancy following exposure in utero remains about 1 in 10,000. Since the upper confidence limit of the relative risk of malignancy may be as high as 1.8 times that of an unexposed pregnancy, we cannot exclude the possibility that fetal exposure to CT or radionuclide imaging is carcinogenic. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
format Text
id pubmed-2935460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29354602010-09-13 Major Radiodiagnostic Imaging in Pregnancy and the Risk of Childhood Malignancy: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Ontario Ray, Joel G. Schull, Michael J. Urquia, Marcelo L. You, John J. Guttmann, Astrid Vermeulen, Marian J. PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The association between fetal exposure to major radiodiagnostic testing in pregnancy—computed tomography (CT) and radionuclide imaging—and the risk of childhood cancer is not established. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We completed a population-based study of 1.8 million maternal-child pairs in the province of Ontario, from 1991 to 2008. We used Ontario's universal health care–linked administrative databases to identify all term obstetrical deliveries and newborn records, inpatient and outpatient major radiodiagnostic services, as well as all children with a malignancy after birth. There were 5,590 mothers exposed to major radiodiagnostic testing in pregnancy (3.0 per 1,000) and 1,829,927 mothers not exposed. The rate of radiodiagnostic testing increased from 1.1 to 6.3 per 1,000 pregnancies over the study period; about 73% of tests were CT scans. After a median duration of follow-up of 8.9 years, four childhood cancers arose in the exposed group (1.13 per 10,000 person-years) and 2,539 cancers in the unexposed group (1.56 per 10,000 person-years), a crude hazard ratio of 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.26–1.82). After adjusting for maternal age, income quintile, urban status, and maternal cancer, as well as infant sex, chromosomal or congenital anomalies, and major radiodiagnostic test exposure after birth, the risk was essentially unchanged (hazard ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.25–1.80). CONCLUSIONS: Although major radiodiagnostic testing is now performed in about 1 in 160 pregnancies in Ontario, the absolute annual risk of childhood malignancy following exposure in utero remains about 1 in 10,000. Since the upper confidence limit of the relative risk of malignancy may be as high as 1.8 times that of an unexposed pregnancy, we cannot exclude the possibility that fetal exposure to CT or radionuclide imaging is carcinogenic. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary Public Library of Science 2010-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2935460/ /pubmed/20838660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000337 Text en Ray et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ray, Joel G.
Schull, Michael J.
Urquia, Marcelo L.
You, John J.
Guttmann, Astrid
Vermeulen, Marian J.
Major Radiodiagnostic Imaging in Pregnancy and the Risk of Childhood Malignancy: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Ontario
title Major Radiodiagnostic Imaging in Pregnancy and the Risk of Childhood Malignancy: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Ontario
title_full Major Radiodiagnostic Imaging in Pregnancy and the Risk of Childhood Malignancy: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Ontario
title_fullStr Major Radiodiagnostic Imaging in Pregnancy and the Risk of Childhood Malignancy: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Ontario
title_full_unstemmed Major Radiodiagnostic Imaging in Pregnancy and the Risk of Childhood Malignancy: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Ontario
title_short Major Radiodiagnostic Imaging in Pregnancy and the Risk of Childhood Malignancy: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Ontario
title_sort major radiodiagnostic imaging in pregnancy and the risk of childhood malignancy: a population-based cohort study in ontario
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2935460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20838660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000337
work_keys_str_mv AT rayjoelg majorradiodiagnosticimaginginpregnancyandtheriskofchildhoodmalignancyapopulationbasedcohortstudyinontario
AT schullmichaelj majorradiodiagnosticimaginginpregnancyandtheriskofchildhoodmalignancyapopulationbasedcohortstudyinontario
AT urquiamarcelol majorradiodiagnosticimaginginpregnancyandtheriskofchildhoodmalignancyapopulationbasedcohortstudyinontario
AT youjohnj majorradiodiagnosticimaginginpregnancyandtheriskofchildhoodmalignancyapopulationbasedcohortstudyinontario
AT guttmannastrid majorradiodiagnosticimaginginpregnancyandtheriskofchildhoodmalignancyapopulationbasedcohortstudyinontario
AT vermeulenmarianj majorradiodiagnosticimaginginpregnancyandtheriskofchildhoodmalignancyapopulationbasedcohortstudyinontario