Cargando…

Vaccine development in Staphylococcus aureus: taking the biofilm phenotype into consideration

Vaccine development against pathogenic bacteria is an imperative initiative as bacteria are gaining resistance to current antimicrobial therapies and few novel antibiotics are being developed. Candidate antigens for vaccine development can be identified by a multitude of high-throughput technologies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harro, Janette M, Peters, Brian M, O'May, Graeme A, Archer, Nathan, Kerns, Patrick, Prabhakara, Ranjani, Shirtliff, Mark E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2936112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20602638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00708.x
_version_ 1782186449977737216
author Harro, Janette M
Peters, Brian M
O'May, Graeme A
Archer, Nathan
Kerns, Patrick
Prabhakara, Ranjani
Shirtliff, Mark E
author_facet Harro, Janette M
Peters, Brian M
O'May, Graeme A
Archer, Nathan
Kerns, Patrick
Prabhakara, Ranjani
Shirtliff, Mark E
author_sort Harro, Janette M
collection PubMed
description Vaccine development against pathogenic bacteria is an imperative initiative as bacteria are gaining resistance to current antimicrobial therapies and few novel antibiotics are being developed. Candidate antigens for vaccine development can be identified by a multitude of high-throughput technologies that were accelerated by access to complete genomes. While considerable success has been achieved in vaccine development against bacterial pathogens, many species with multiple virulence factors and modes of infection have provided reasonable challenges in identifying protective antigens. In particular, vaccine candidates should be evaluated in the context of the complex disease properties, whether planktonic (e.g. sepsis and pneumonia) and/or biofilm associated (e.g. indwelling medical device infections). Because of the phenotypic differences between these modes of growth, those vaccine candidates chosen only for their efficacy in one disease state may fail against other infections. This review will summarize the history and types of bacterial vaccines and adjuvants as well as present an overview of modern antigen discovery and complications brought about by polymicrobial infections. Finally, we will also use one of the better studied microbial species that uses differential, multifactorial protein profiles to mediate an array of diseases, Staphylococcus aureus, to outline some of the more recently identified problematic issues in vaccine development in this biofilm-forming species.
format Text
id pubmed-2936112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29361122010-09-17 Vaccine development in Staphylococcus aureus: taking the biofilm phenotype into consideration Harro, Janette M Peters, Brian M O'May, Graeme A Archer, Nathan Kerns, Patrick Prabhakara, Ranjani Shirtliff, Mark E FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol MiniReviews Vaccine development against pathogenic bacteria is an imperative initiative as bacteria are gaining resistance to current antimicrobial therapies and few novel antibiotics are being developed. Candidate antigens for vaccine development can be identified by a multitude of high-throughput technologies that were accelerated by access to complete genomes. While considerable success has been achieved in vaccine development against bacterial pathogens, many species with multiple virulence factors and modes of infection have provided reasonable challenges in identifying protective antigens. In particular, vaccine candidates should be evaluated in the context of the complex disease properties, whether planktonic (e.g. sepsis and pneumonia) and/or biofilm associated (e.g. indwelling medical device infections). Because of the phenotypic differences between these modes of growth, those vaccine candidates chosen only for their efficacy in one disease state may fail against other infections. This review will summarize the history and types of bacterial vaccines and adjuvants as well as present an overview of modern antigen discovery and complications brought about by polymicrobial infections. Finally, we will also use one of the better studied microbial species that uses differential, multifactorial protein profiles to mediate an array of diseases, Staphylococcus aureus, to outline some of the more recently identified problematic issues in vaccine development in this biofilm-forming species. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010-08 2010-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2936112/ /pubmed/20602638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00708.x Text en © 2010 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle MiniReviews
Harro, Janette M
Peters, Brian M
O'May, Graeme A
Archer, Nathan
Kerns, Patrick
Prabhakara, Ranjani
Shirtliff, Mark E
Vaccine development in Staphylococcus aureus: taking the biofilm phenotype into consideration
title Vaccine development in Staphylococcus aureus: taking the biofilm phenotype into consideration
title_full Vaccine development in Staphylococcus aureus: taking the biofilm phenotype into consideration
title_fullStr Vaccine development in Staphylococcus aureus: taking the biofilm phenotype into consideration
title_full_unstemmed Vaccine development in Staphylococcus aureus: taking the biofilm phenotype into consideration
title_short Vaccine development in Staphylococcus aureus: taking the biofilm phenotype into consideration
title_sort vaccine development in staphylococcus aureus: taking the biofilm phenotype into consideration
topic MiniReviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2936112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20602638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00708.x
work_keys_str_mv AT harrojanettem vaccinedevelopmentinstaphylococcusaureustakingthebiofilmphenotypeintoconsideration
AT petersbrianm vaccinedevelopmentinstaphylococcusaureustakingthebiofilmphenotypeintoconsideration
AT omaygraemea vaccinedevelopmentinstaphylococcusaureustakingthebiofilmphenotypeintoconsideration
AT archernathan vaccinedevelopmentinstaphylococcusaureustakingthebiofilmphenotypeintoconsideration
AT kernspatrick vaccinedevelopmentinstaphylococcusaureustakingthebiofilmphenotypeintoconsideration
AT prabhakararanjani vaccinedevelopmentinstaphylococcusaureustakingthebiofilmphenotypeintoconsideration
AT shirtliffmarke vaccinedevelopmentinstaphylococcusaureustakingthebiofilmphenotypeintoconsideration