Cargando…
The Coevolution of Virulence: Tolerance in Perspective
Coevolutionary interactions, such as those between host and parasite, predator and prey, or plant and pollinator, evolve subject to the genes of both interactors. It is clear, for example, that the evolution of pollination strategies can only be understood with knowledge of both the pollinator and t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2936544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20838464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001006 |
_version_ | 1782186506426777600 |
---|---|
author | Little, Tom J. Shuker, David M. Colegrave, Nick Day, Troy Graham, Andrea L. |
author_facet | Little, Tom J. Shuker, David M. Colegrave, Nick Day, Troy Graham, Andrea L. |
author_sort | Little, Tom J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Coevolutionary interactions, such as those between host and parasite, predator and prey, or plant and pollinator, evolve subject to the genes of both interactors. It is clear, for example, that the evolution of pollination strategies can only be understood with knowledge of both the pollinator and the pollinated. Studies of the evolution of virulence, the reduction in host fitness due to infection, have nonetheless tended to focus on parasite evolution. Host-centric approaches have also been proposed—for example, under the rubric of “tolerance”, the ability of hosts to minimize virulence without necessarily minimizing parasite density. Within the tolerance framework, however, there is room for more comprehensive measures of host fitness traits, and for fuller consideration of the consequences of coevolution. For example, the evolution of tolerance can result in changed selection on parasite populations, which should provoke parasite evolution despite the fact that tolerance is not directly antagonistic to parasite fitness. As a result, consideration of the potential for parasite counter-adaptation to host tolerance—whether evolved or medially manipulated—is essential to the emergence of a cohesive theory of biotic partnerships and robust disease control strategies. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2936544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29365442010-09-13 The Coevolution of Virulence: Tolerance in Perspective Little, Tom J. Shuker, David M. Colegrave, Nick Day, Troy Graham, Andrea L. PLoS Pathog Review Coevolutionary interactions, such as those between host and parasite, predator and prey, or plant and pollinator, evolve subject to the genes of both interactors. It is clear, for example, that the evolution of pollination strategies can only be understood with knowledge of both the pollinator and the pollinated. Studies of the evolution of virulence, the reduction in host fitness due to infection, have nonetheless tended to focus on parasite evolution. Host-centric approaches have also been proposed—for example, under the rubric of “tolerance”, the ability of hosts to minimize virulence without necessarily minimizing parasite density. Within the tolerance framework, however, there is room for more comprehensive measures of host fitness traits, and for fuller consideration of the consequences of coevolution. For example, the evolution of tolerance can result in changed selection on parasite populations, which should provoke parasite evolution despite the fact that tolerance is not directly antagonistic to parasite fitness. As a result, consideration of the potential for parasite counter-adaptation to host tolerance—whether evolved or medially manipulated—is essential to the emergence of a cohesive theory of biotic partnerships and robust disease control strategies. Public Library of Science 2010-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2936544/ /pubmed/20838464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001006 Text en Little et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Little, Tom J. Shuker, David M. Colegrave, Nick Day, Troy Graham, Andrea L. The Coevolution of Virulence: Tolerance in Perspective |
title | The Coevolution of Virulence: Tolerance in Perspective |
title_full | The Coevolution of Virulence: Tolerance in Perspective |
title_fullStr | The Coevolution of Virulence: Tolerance in Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | The Coevolution of Virulence: Tolerance in Perspective |
title_short | The Coevolution of Virulence: Tolerance in Perspective |
title_sort | coevolution of virulence: tolerance in perspective |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2936544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20838464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT littletomj thecoevolutionofvirulencetoleranceinperspective AT shukerdavidm thecoevolutionofvirulencetoleranceinperspective AT colegravenick thecoevolutionofvirulencetoleranceinperspective AT daytroy thecoevolutionofvirulencetoleranceinperspective AT grahamandreal thecoevolutionofvirulencetoleranceinperspective AT littletomj coevolutionofvirulencetoleranceinperspective AT shukerdavidm coevolutionofvirulencetoleranceinperspective AT colegravenick coevolutionofvirulencetoleranceinperspective AT daytroy coevolutionofvirulencetoleranceinperspective AT grahamandreal coevolutionofvirulencetoleranceinperspective |