Cargando…

A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies

CONTEXT: Significant resources and time are invested in the production of research knowledge. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of three knowledge translation and exchange strategies in the incorporation of research evidence into public healt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dobbins, Maureen, Hanna, Steven E, Ciliska, Donna, Manske, Steve, Cameron, Roy, Mercer, Shawna L, O'Mara, Linda, DeCorby, Kara, Robeson, Paula
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2936828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19775439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-61
_version_ 1782186521742278656
author Dobbins, Maureen
Hanna, Steven E
Ciliska, Donna
Manske, Steve
Cameron, Roy
Mercer, Shawna L
O'Mara, Linda
DeCorby, Kara
Robeson, Paula
author_facet Dobbins, Maureen
Hanna, Steven E
Ciliska, Donna
Manske, Steve
Cameron, Roy
Mercer, Shawna L
O'Mara, Linda
DeCorby, Kara
Robeson, Paula
author_sort Dobbins, Maureen
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Significant resources and time are invested in the production of research knowledge. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of three knowledge translation and exchange strategies in the incorporation of research evidence into public health policies and programs. METHODS: This trial was conducted with a national sample of public health departments in Canada from 2004 to 2006. The three interventions, implemented over one year in 2005, included access to an online registry of research evidence; tailored messaging; and a knowledge broker. The primary outcome assessed the extent to which research evidence was used in a recent program decision, and the secondary outcome measured the change in the sum of evidence-informed healthy body weight promotion policies or programs being delivered at health departments. Mixed-effects models were used to test the hypotheses. FINDINGS: One hundred and eight of 141 (77%) health departments participated in this study. No significant effect of the intervention was observed for primary outcome (p < 0.45). However, for public health policies and programs (HPPs), a significant effect of the intervention was observed only for tailored, targeted messages (p < 0.01). The treatment effect was moderated by organizational research culture (e.g., value placed on research evidence in decision making). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that under certain conditions tailored, targeted messages are more effective than knowledge brokering and access to an online registry of research evidence. Greater emphasis on the identification of organizational factors is needed in order to implement strategies that best meet the needs of individual organizations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial registration number and title are as follows: ISRCTN35240937 -- Is a knowledge broker more effective than other strategies in promoting evidence-based physical activity and healthy body weight programming?
format Text
id pubmed-2936828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29368282010-09-11 A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies Dobbins, Maureen Hanna, Steven E Ciliska, Donna Manske, Steve Cameron, Roy Mercer, Shawna L O'Mara, Linda DeCorby, Kara Robeson, Paula Implement Sci Research Article CONTEXT: Significant resources and time are invested in the production of research knowledge. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of three knowledge translation and exchange strategies in the incorporation of research evidence into public health policies and programs. METHODS: This trial was conducted with a national sample of public health departments in Canada from 2004 to 2006. The three interventions, implemented over one year in 2005, included access to an online registry of research evidence; tailored messaging; and a knowledge broker. The primary outcome assessed the extent to which research evidence was used in a recent program decision, and the secondary outcome measured the change in the sum of evidence-informed healthy body weight promotion policies or programs being delivered at health departments. Mixed-effects models were used to test the hypotheses. FINDINGS: One hundred and eight of 141 (77%) health departments participated in this study. No significant effect of the intervention was observed for primary outcome (p < 0.45). However, for public health policies and programs (HPPs), a significant effect of the intervention was observed only for tailored, targeted messages (p < 0.01). The treatment effect was moderated by organizational research culture (e.g., value placed on research evidence in decision making). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that under certain conditions tailored, targeted messages are more effective than knowledge brokering and access to an online registry of research evidence. Greater emphasis on the identification of organizational factors is needed in order to implement strategies that best meet the needs of individual organizations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial registration number and title are as follows: ISRCTN35240937 -- Is a knowledge broker more effective than other strategies in promoting evidence-based physical activity and healthy body weight programming? BioMed Central 2009-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2936828/ /pubmed/19775439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-61 Text en Copyright ©2009 Dobbins et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dobbins, Maureen
Hanna, Steven E
Ciliska, Donna
Manske, Steve
Cameron, Roy
Mercer, Shawna L
O'Mara, Linda
DeCorby, Kara
Robeson, Paula
A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies
title A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies
title_full A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies
title_short A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies
title_sort randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2936828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19775439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-61
work_keys_str_mv AT dobbinsmaureen arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies
AT hannastevene arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies
AT ciliskadonna arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies
AT manskesteve arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies
AT cameronroy arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies
AT mercershawnal arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies
AT omaralinda arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies
AT decorbykara arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies
AT robesonpaula arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies
AT dobbinsmaureen randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies
AT hannastevene randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies
AT ciliskadonna randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies
AT manskesteve randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies
AT cameronroy randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies
AT mercershawnal randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies
AT omaralinda randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies
AT decorbykara randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies
AT robesonpaula randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies