Cargando…
A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies
CONTEXT: Significant resources and time are invested in the production of research knowledge. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of three knowledge translation and exchange strategies in the incorporation of research evidence into public healt...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2936828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19775439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-61 |
_version_ | 1782186521742278656 |
---|---|
author | Dobbins, Maureen Hanna, Steven E Ciliska, Donna Manske, Steve Cameron, Roy Mercer, Shawna L O'Mara, Linda DeCorby, Kara Robeson, Paula |
author_facet | Dobbins, Maureen Hanna, Steven E Ciliska, Donna Manske, Steve Cameron, Roy Mercer, Shawna L O'Mara, Linda DeCorby, Kara Robeson, Paula |
author_sort | Dobbins, Maureen |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Significant resources and time are invested in the production of research knowledge. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of three knowledge translation and exchange strategies in the incorporation of research evidence into public health policies and programs. METHODS: This trial was conducted with a national sample of public health departments in Canada from 2004 to 2006. The three interventions, implemented over one year in 2005, included access to an online registry of research evidence; tailored messaging; and a knowledge broker. The primary outcome assessed the extent to which research evidence was used in a recent program decision, and the secondary outcome measured the change in the sum of evidence-informed healthy body weight promotion policies or programs being delivered at health departments. Mixed-effects models were used to test the hypotheses. FINDINGS: One hundred and eight of 141 (77%) health departments participated in this study. No significant effect of the intervention was observed for primary outcome (p < 0.45). However, for public health policies and programs (HPPs), a significant effect of the intervention was observed only for tailored, targeted messages (p < 0.01). The treatment effect was moderated by organizational research culture (e.g., value placed on research evidence in decision making). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that under certain conditions tailored, targeted messages are more effective than knowledge brokering and access to an online registry of research evidence. Greater emphasis on the identification of organizational factors is needed in order to implement strategies that best meet the needs of individual organizations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial registration number and title are as follows: ISRCTN35240937 -- Is a knowledge broker more effective than other strategies in promoting evidence-based physical activity and healthy body weight programming? |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2936828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29368282010-09-11 A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies Dobbins, Maureen Hanna, Steven E Ciliska, Donna Manske, Steve Cameron, Roy Mercer, Shawna L O'Mara, Linda DeCorby, Kara Robeson, Paula Implement Sci Research Article CONTEXT: Significant resources and time are invested in the production of research knowledge. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of three knowledge translation and exchange strategies in the incorporation of research evidence into public health policies and programs. METHODS: This trial was conducted with a national sample of public health departments in Canada from 2004 to 2006. The three interventions, implemented over one year in 2005, included access to an online registry of research evidence; tailored messaging; and a knowledge broker. The primary outcome assessed the extent to which research evidence was used in a recent program decision, and the secondary outcome measured the change in the sum of evidence-informed healthy body weight promotion policies or programs being delivered at health departments. Mixed-effects models were used to test the hypotheses. FINDINGS: One hundred and eight of 141 (77%) health departments participated in this study. No significant effect of the intervention was observed for primary outcome (p < 0.45). However, for public health policies and programs (HPPs), a significant effect of the intervention was observed only for tailored, targeted messages (p < 0.01). The treatment effect was moderated by organizational research culture (e.g., value placed on research evidence in decision making). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that under certain conditions tailored, targeted messages are more effective than knowledge brokering and access to an online registry of research evidence. Greater emphasis on the identification of organizational factors is needed in order to implement strategies that best meet the needs of individual organizations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial registration number and title are as follows: ISRCTN35240937 -- Is a knowledge broker more effective than other strategies in promoting evidence-based physical activity and healthy body weight programming? BioMed Central 2009-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC2936828/ /pubmed/19775439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-61 Text en Copyright ©2009 Dobbins et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dobbins, Maureen Hanna, Steven E Ciliska, Donna Manske, Steve Cameron, Roy Mercer, Shawna L O'Mara, Linda DeCorby, Kara Robeson, Paula A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies |
title | A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies |
title_full | A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies |
title_fullStr | A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies |
title_short | A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies |
title_sort | randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2936828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19775439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-61 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dobbinsmaureen arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies AT hannastevene arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies AT ciliskadonna arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies AT manskesteve arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies AT cameronroy arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies AT mercershawnal arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies AT omaralinda arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies AT decorbykara arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies AT robesonpaula arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies AT dobbinsmaureen randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies AT hannastevene randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies AT ciliskadonna randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies AT manskesteve randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies AT cameronroy randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies AT mercershawnal randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies AT omaralinda randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies AT decorbykara randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies AT robesonpaula randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheimpactofknowledgetranslationandexchangestrategies |