Cargando…

Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided and stimulating popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters for postoperative analgesia

PURPOSE: Perineural catheter insertion using ultrasound guidance alone is a relatively new approach. Previous studies have shown that ultrasound-guided catheters take less time to place with high placement success rates, but the analgesic efficacy compared with the established stimulating catheter t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mariano, Edward R., Loland, Vanessa J., Sandhu, NavParkash S., Bishop, Michael L., Lee, Daniel K., Schwartz, Alexandra K., Girard, Paul J., Ferguson, Eliza J., Ilfeld, Brian M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2937147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20700680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-010-9364-7
_version_ 1782186547282444288
author Mariano, Edward R.
Loland, Vanessa J.
Sandhu, NavParkash S.
Bishop, Michael L.
Lee, Daniel K.
Schwartz, Alexandra K.
Girard, Paul J.
Ferguson, Eliza J.
Ilfeld, Brian M.
author_facet Mariano, Edward R.
Loland, Vanessa J.
Sandhu, NavParkash S.
Bishop, Michael L.
Lee, Daniel K.
Schwartz, Alexandra K.
Girard, Paul J.
Ferguson, Eliza J.
Ilfeld, Brian M.
author_sort Mariano, Edward R.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Perineural catheter insertion using ultrasound guidance alone is a relatively new approach. Previous studies have shown that ultrasound-guided catheters take less time to place with high placement success rates, but the analgesic efficacy compared with the established stimulating catheter technique remains unknown. We tested the hypothesis that popliteal-sciatic perineural catheter insertion relying exclusively on ultrasound guidance results in superior postoperative analgesia compared with stimulating catheters. METHODS: Preoperatively, subjects receiving a popliteal-sciatic perineural catheter for foot or ankle surgery were assigned randomly to either ultrasound guidance (bolus via needle with non-stimulating catheter insertion) or electrical stimulation (bolus via catheter). We used 1.5% mepivacaine 40 mL for the primary surgical nerve block and 0.2% ropivacaine (basal 8 mL·hr(−1); bolus 4 mL; 30 min lockout) was infused postoperatively. The primary outcome was average surgical pain on postoperative day one. RESULTS: Forty of the 80 subjects enrolled were randomized to each treatment group. One of 40 subjects (2.5%) in the ultrasound group failed catheter placement per protocol vs nine of 40 (22.5%) in the stimulating catheter group (P = 0.014). The difference in procedural duration (mean [95% confidence interval (CI)]) was −6.48 (−9.90 - −3.05) min, with ultrasound requiring 7.0 (4.0-14.1) min vs stimulation requiring 11.0 (5.0-30.0) min (P < 0.001). The average pain scores of subjects who provided data on postoperative day one were somewhat higher for the 33 ultrasound subjects than for the 26 stimulation subjects (5.0 [1.0-7.8] vs 3.0 [0.0-6.5], respectively; P = 0.032), a difference (mean [95%CI]) of 1.37 (0.03-2.71). CONCLUSION: For popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters, ultrasound guidance takes less time and results in fewer placement failures compared with stimulating catheters. However, analgesia may be mildly improved with successfully placed stimulating catheters. Clinical trial registration number NCT00876681.
format Text
id pubmed-2937147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29371472010-10-05 Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided and stimulating popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters for postoperative analgesia Mariano, Edward R. Loland, Vanessa J. Sandhu, NavParkash S. Bishop, Michael L. Lee, Daniel K. Schwartz, Alexandra K. Girard, Paul J. Ferguson, Eliza J. Ilfeld, Brian M. Can J Anaesth Reports of Original Investigations PURPOSE: Perineural catheter insertion using ultrasound guidance alone is a relatively new approach. Previous studies have shown that ultrasound-guided catheters take less time to place with high placement success rates, but the analgesic efficacy compared with the established stimulating catheter technique remains unknown. We tested the hypothesis that popliteal-sciatic perineural catheter insertion relying exclusively on ultrasound guidance results in superior postoperative analgesia compared with stimulating catheters. METHODS: Preoperatively, subjects receiving a popliteal-sciatic perineural catheter for foot or ankle surgery were assigned randomly to either ultrasound guidance (bolus via needle with non-stimulating catheter insertion) or electrical stimulation (bolus via catheter). We used 1.5% mepivacaine 40 mL for the primary surgical nerve block and 0.2% ropivacaine (basal 8 mL·hr(−1); bolus 4 mL; 30 min lockout) was infused postoperatively. The primary outcome was average surgical pain on postoperative day one. RESULTS: Forty of the 80 subjects enrolled were randomized to each treatment group. One of 40 subjects (2.5%) in the ultrasound group failed catheter placement per protocol vs nine of 40 (22.5%) in the stimulating catheter group (P = 0.014). The difference in procedural duration (mean [95% confidence interval (CI)]) was −6.48 (−9.90 - −3.05) min, with ultrasound requiring 7.0 (4.0-14.1) min vs stimulation requiring 11.0 (5.0-30.0) min (P < 0.001). The average pain scores of subjects who provided data on postoperative day one were somewhat higher for the 33 ultrasound subjects than for the 26 stimulation subjects (5.0 [1.0-7.8] vs 3.0 [0.0-6.5], respectively; P = 0.032), a difference (mean [95%CI]) of 1.37 (0.03-2.71). CONCLUSION: For popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters, ultrasound guidance takes less time and results in fewer placement failures compared with stimulating catheters. However, analgesia may be mildly improved with successfully placed stimulating catheters. Clinical trial registration number NCT00876681. Springer-Verlag 2010-08-11 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2937147/ /pubmed/20700680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-010-9364-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Reports of Original Investigations
Mariano, Edward R.
Loland, Vanessa J.
Sandhu, NavParkash S.
Bishop, Michael L.
Lee, Daniel K.
Schwartz, Alexandra K.
Girard, Paul J.
Ferguson, Eliza J.
Ilfeld, Brian M.
Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided and stimulating popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters for postoperative analgesia
title Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided and stimulating popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters for postoperative analgesia
title_full Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided and stimulating popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters for postoperative analgesia
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided and stimulating popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters for postoperative analgesia
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided and stimulating popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters for postoperative analgesia
title_short Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided and stimulating popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters for postoperative analgesia
title_sort comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided and stimulating popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters for postoperative analgesia
topic Reports of Original Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2937147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20700680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-010-9364-7
work_keys_str_mv AT marianoedwardr comparativeefficacyofultrasoundguidedandstimulatingpoplitealsciaticperineuralcathetersforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT lolandvanessaj comparativeefficacyofultrasoundguidedandstimulatingpoplitealsciaticperineuralcathetersforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT sandhunavparkashs comparativeefficacyofultrasoundguidedandstimulatingpoplitealsciaticperineuralcathetersforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT bishopmichaell comparativeefficacyofultrasoundguidedandstimulatingpoplitealsciaticperineuralcathetersforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT leedanielk comparativeefficacyofultrasoundguidedandstimulatingpoplitealsciaticperineuralcathetersforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT schwartzalexandrak comparativeefficacyofultrasoundguidedandstimulatingpoplitealsciaticperineuralcathetersforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT girardpaulj comparativeefficacyofultrasoundguidedandstimulatingpoplitealsciaticperineuralcathetersforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT fergusonelizaj comparativeefficacyofultrasoundguidedandstimulatingpoplitealsciaticperineuralcathetersforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT ilfeldbrianm comparativeefficacyofultrasoundguidedandstimulatingpoplitealsciaticperineuralcathetersforpostoperativeanalgesia