Cargando…

Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: There is an unexplained male predominance in the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma, and the sex-specific distribution of its risk factors in the general population is not known. METHODS: A random sample of Swedish citizens aged 40–79 years completed a questionnaire for assessment o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rutegård, M, Nordenstedt, H, Lu, Y, Lagergren, J, Lagergren, P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2938252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20700121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605804
_version_ 1782186580963753984
author Rutegård, M
Nordenstedt, H
Lu, Y
Lagergren, J
Lagergren, P
author_facet Rutegård, M
Nordenstedt, H
Lu, Y
Lagergren, J
Lagergren, P
author_sort Rutegård, M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is an unexplained male predominance in the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma, and the sex-specific distribution of its risk factors in the general population is not known. METHODS: A random sample of Swedish citizens aged 40–79 years completed a questionnaire for assessment of the prevalence of five risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma: reflux symptoms, body mass index, tobacco smoking habits, socioeconomic status, and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the association of these risk factors, separately and combined, with male sex, with women as reference. RESULTS: Among 6969 invited people, 4906 (70.4%) completed the questionnaire. Adjusted prevalence estimates showed a negative association with male sex with regard to reflux disease (OR=0.70, 95% CI=0.58–0.84), whereas overweight (OR=1.98, 95% CI=1.72–2.27) and obesity (OR=1.22, 95% CI=1.01–1.47), previous smoking (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.30–1.72), and no NSAID use (OR=1.35, 95% CI=1.15–1.49) were positively associated. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to some but not all established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma seems to be more common in men than in women, but the differences are small and unlikely to explain the male predominance of this tumour.
format Text
id pubmed-2938252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29382522011-08-24 Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma Rutegård, M Nordenstedt, H Lu, Y Lagergren, J Lagergren, P Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: There is an unexplained male predominance in the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma, and the sex-specific distribution of its risk factors in the general population is not known. METHODS: A random sample of Swedish citizens aged 40–79 years completed a questionnaire for assessment of the prevalence of five risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma: reflux symptoms, body mass index, tobacco smoking habits, socioeconomic status, and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the association of these risk factors, separately and combined, with male sex, with women as reference. RESULTS: Among 6969 invited people, 4906 (70.4%) completed the questionnaire. Adjusted prevalence estimates showed a negative association with male sex with regard to reflux disease (OR=0.70, 95% CI=0.58–0.84), whereas overweight (OR=1.98, 95% CI=1.72–2.27) and obesity (OR=1.22, 95% CI=1.01–1.47), previous smoking (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.30–1.72), and no NSAID use (OR=1.35, 95% CI=1.15–1.49) were positively associated. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to some but not all established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma seems to be more common in men than in women, but the differences are small and unlikely to explain the male predominance of this tumour. Nature Publishing Group 2010-08-24 2010-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2938252/ /pubmed/20700121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605804 Text en Copyright © 2010 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Rutegård, M
Nordenstedt, H
Lu, Y
Lagergren, J
Lagergren, P
Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_full Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_short Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_sort sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2938252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20700121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605804
work_keys_str_mv AT rutegardm sexspecificexposureprevalenceofestablishedriskfactorsforoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT nordenstedth sexspecificexposureprevalenceofestablishedriskfactorsforoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT luy sexspecificexposureprevalenceofestablishedriskfactorsforoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT lagergrenj sexspecificexposureprevalenceofestablishedriskfactorsforoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT lagergrenp sexspecificexposureprevalenceofestablishedriskfactorsforoesophagealadenocarcinoma