Cargando…
Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma
BACKGROUND: There is an unexplained male predominance in the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma, and the sex-specific distribution of its risk factors in the general population is not known. METHODS: A random sample of Swedish citizens aged 40–79 years completed a questionnaire for assessment o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2938252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20700121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605804 |
_version_ | 1782186580963753984 |
---|---|
author | Rutegård, M Nordenstedt, H Lu, Y Lagergren, J Lagergren, P |
author_facet | Rutegård, M Nordenstedt, H Lu, Y Lagergren, J Lagergren, P |
author_sort | Rutegård, M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is an unexplained male predominance in the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma, and the sex-specific distribution of its risk factors in the general population is not known. METHODS: A random sample of Swedish citizens aged 40–79 years completed a questionnaire for assessment of the prevalence of five risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma: reflux symptoms, body mass index, tobacco smoking habits, socioeconomic status, and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the association of these risk factors, separately and combined, with male sex, with women as reference. RESULTS: Among 6969 invited people, 4906 (70.4%) completed the questionnaire. Adjusted prevalence estimates showed a negative association with male sex with regard to reflux disease (OR=0.70, 95% CI=0.58–0.84), whereas overweight (OR=1.98, 95% CI=1.72–2.27) and obesity (OR=1.22, 95% CI=1.01–1.47), previous smoking (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.30–1.72), and no NSAID use (OR=1.35, 95% CI=1.15–1.49) were positively associated. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to some but not all established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma seems to be more common in men than in women, but the differences are small and unlikely to explain the male predominance of this tumour. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2938252 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29382522011-08-24 Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma Rutegård, M Nordenstedt, H Lu, Y Lagergren, J Lagergren, P Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: There is an unexplained male predominance in the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma, and the sex-specific distribution of its risk factors in the general population is not known. METHODS: A random sample of Swedish citizens aged 40–79 years completed a questionnaire for assessment of the prevalence of five risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma: reflux symptoms, body mass index, tobacco smoking habits, socioeconomic status, and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the association of these risk factors, separately and combined, with male sex, with women as reference. RESULTS: Among 6969 invited people, 4906 (70.4%) completed the questionnaire. Adjusted prevalence estimates showed a negative association with male sex with regard to reflux disease (OR=0.70, 95% CI=0.58–0.84), whereas overweight (OR=1.98, 95% CI=1.72–2.27) and obesity (OR=1.22, 95% CI=1.01–1.47), previous smoking (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.30–1.72), and no NSAID use (OR=1.35, 95% CI=1.15–1.49) were positively associated. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to some but not all established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma seems to be more common in men than in women, but the differences are small and unlikely to explain the male predominance of this tumour. Nature Publishing Group 2010-08-24 2010-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2938252/ /pubmed/20700121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605804 Text en Copyright © 2010 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Rutegård, M Nordenstedt, H Lu, Y Lagergren, J Lagergren, P Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma |
title | Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma |
title_full | Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma |
title_short | Sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma |
title_sort | sex-specific exposure prevalence of established risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2938252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20700121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605804 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rutegardm sexspecificexposureprevalenceofestablishedriskfactorsforoesophagealadenocarcinoma AT nordenstedth sexspecificexposureprevalenceofestablishedriskfactorsforoesophagealadenocarcinoma AT luy sexspecificexposureprevalenceofestablishedriskfactorsforoesophagealadenocarcinoma AT lagergrenj sexspecificexposureprevalenceofestablishedriskfactorsforoesophagealadenocarcinoma AT lagergrenp sexspecificexposureprevalenceofestablishedriskfactorsforoesophagealadenocarcinoma |