Cargando…

Reasons for reoperation after epilepsy surgery: a review based on a complex clinical case with three operations

The results of surgical treatment of epileptic seizures have gradually improved in the past decade, approaching 60% to 90% seizure-free outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy and 45% to 66% in extratemporal lobe epilepsy. Unfortunately some patients continue with seizures after epilepsy surgery and the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Téllez-Zenteno, José F, Moien-Afshari, Farzad, Hernández-Ronquillo, Lizbeth, Griebel, Robert, Sadanand, Venkat
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2938290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20856605
_version_ 1782186589946904576
author Téllez-Zenteno, José F
Moien-Afshari, Farzad
Hernández-Ronquillo, Lizbeth
Griebel, Robert
Sadanand, Venkat
author_facet Téllez-Zenteno, José F
Moien-Afshari, Farzad
Hernández-Ronquillo, Lizbeth
Griebel, Robert
Sadanand, Venkat
author_sort Téllez-Zenteno, José F
collection PubMed
description The results of surgical treatment of epileptic seizures have gradually improved in the past decade, approaching 60% to 90% seizure-free outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy and 45% to 66% in extratemporal lobe epilepsy. Unfortunately some patients continue with seizures after epilepsy surgery and the studies have shown that approximately the 3% to 15% of patients with a previous failed surgical procedure are reoperated. Selected patients may be candidates for further surgery, potentially leading to a significant decrease in the frequency and severity of seizures. In patients with intractable partial epilepsy there are many possible factors, alone or in combination, that could be related to the failure of resection. Some of the factors could be genetic or acquired predisposition to epileptogenicity. In this article we report a case with intractable epilepsy that required three interventions to render seizure free. We analyzed our specific case in the light of previous reports on reoperation and enumerate the potential reasons for reoperation that could apply to all patients with failure of an initial procedure.
format Text
id pubmed-2938290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29382902010-09-20 Reasons for reoperation after epilepsy surgery: a review based on a complex clinical case with three operations Téllez-Zenteno, José F Moien-Afshari, Farzad Hernández-Ronquillo, Lizbeth Griebel, Robert Sadanand, Venkat Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Case Report The results of surgical treatment of epileptic seizures have gradually improved in the past decade, approaching 60% to 90% seizure-free outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy and 45% to 66% in extratemporal lobe epilepsy. Unfortunately some patients continue with seizures after epilepsy surgery and the studies have shown that approximately the 3% to 15% of patients with a previous failed surgical procedure are reoperated. Selected patients may be candidates for further surgery, potentially leading to a significant decrease in the frequency and severity of seizures. In patients with intractable partial epilepsy there are many possible factors, alone or in combination, that could be related to the failure of resection. Some of the factors could be genetic or acquired predisposition to epileptogenicity. In this article we report a case with intractable epilepsy that required three interventions to render seizure free. We analyzed our specific case in the light of previous reports on reoperation and enumerate the potential reasons for reoperation that could apply to all patients with failure of an initial procedure. Dove Medical Press 2010-09-07 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2938290/ /pubmed/20856605 Text en © 2010 Téllez-Zenteno et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Téllez-Zenteno, José F
Moien-Afshari, Farzad
Hernández-Ronquillo, Lizbeth
Griebel, Robert
Sadanand, Venkat
Reasons for reoperation after epilepsy surgery: a review based on a complex clinical case with three operations
title Reasons for reoperation after epilepsy surgery: a review based on a complex clinical case with three operations
title_full Reasons for reoperation after epilepsy surgery: a review based on a complex clinical case with three operations
title_fullStr Reasons for reoperation after epilepsy surgery: a review based on a complex clinical case with three operations
title_full_unstemmed Reasons for reoperation after epilepsy surgery: a review based on a complex clinical case with three operations
title_short Reasons for reoperation after epilepsy surgery: a review based on a complex clinical case with three operations
title_sort reasons for reoperation after epilepsy surgery: a review based on a complex clinical case with three operations
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2938290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20856605
work_keys_str_mv AT tellezzentenojosef reasonsforreoperationafterepilepsysurgeryareviewbasedonacomplexclinicalcasewiththreeoperations
AT moienafsharifarzad reasonsforreoperationafterepilepsysurgeryareviewbasedonacomplexclinicalcasewiththreeoperations
AT hernandezronquillolizbeth reasonsforreoperationafterepilepsysurgeryareviewbasedonacomplexclinicalcasewiththreeoperations
AT griebelrobert reasonsforreoperationafterepilepsysurgeryareviewbasedonacomplexclinicalcasewiththreeoperations
AT sadanandvenkat reasonsforreoperationafterepilepsysurgeryareviewbasedonacomplexclinicalcasewiththreeoperations