Cargando…
Contributions of remote monitoring to the follow-up of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator leads under advisory
AIMS: Automatic daily transmission of data from implantable cardioverter–defibrillators (ICDs) enables the remote monitoring of device status and leads function. We report on a 2-year experience with remote monitoring in 40 recipients of high-voltage ICD leads, prone to fracture and under advisory s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2938466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20591841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq203 |
_version_ | 1782186624607584256 |
---|---|
author | Guédon-Moreau, Laurence Chevalier, Philippe Marquié, Christelle Kouakam, Claude Klug, Didier Lacroix, Dominique Brigadeau, Francois Kacet, Salem |
author_facet | Guédon-Moreau, Laurence Chevalier, Philippe Marquié, Christelle Kouakam, Claude Klug, Didier Lacroix, Dominique Brigadeau, Francois Kacet, Salem |
author_sort | Guédon-Moreau, Laurence |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Automatic daily transmission of data from implantable cardioverter–defibrillators (ICDs) enables the remote monitoring of device status and leads function. We report on a 2-year experience with remote monitoring in 40 recipients of high-voltage ICD leads, prone to fracture and under advisory since October 2007. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ICDs were remotely monitored as well as systematically interrogated in the ambulatory department every 3 months. The patients were also seen in case of abnormal lead impedance, or other manifestations consistent with lead dysfunction. Over a mean follow-up of 22 ± 4 months after ICD implantation, four lead dysfunctions were suspected because of remotely transmitted oversensing of noise artifacts, abrupt rise in pacing impedance, or both. A lead fracture needing lead replacement was confirmed in three patients (7.5%), two of them before any inappropriate therapy and one after the delivery of three inappropriate shocks. No lead failure was observed in the remaining 36 patients, either at the time of ambulatory visits or during remote monitoring. CONCLUSION: Remote monitoring allowed the early and reliable detection of ICD leads failure without requiring any patient intervention. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2938466 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29384662010-09-15 Contributions of remote monitoring to the follow-up of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator leads under advisory Guédon-Moreau, Laurence Chevalier, Philippe Marquié, Christelle Kouakam, Claude Klug, Didier Lacroix, Dominique Brigadeau, Francois Kacet, Salem Eur Heart J Clinical Research AIMS: Automatic daily transmission of data from implantable cardioverter–defibrillators (ICDs) enables the remote monitoring of device status and leads function. We report on a 2-year experience with remote monitoring in 40 recipients of high-voltage ICD leads, prone to fracture and under advisory since October 2007. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ICDs were remotely monitored as well as systematically interrogated in the ambulatory department every 3 months. The patients were also seen in case of abnormal lead impedance, or other manifestations consistent with lead dysfunction. Over a mean follow-up of 22 ± 4 months after ICD implantation, four lead dysfunctions were suspected because of remotely transmitted oversensing of noise artifacts, abrupt rise in pacing impedance, or both. A lead fracture needing lead replacement was confirmed in three patients (7.5%), two of them before any inappropriate therapy and one after the delivery of three inappropriate shocks. No lead failure was observed in the remaining 36 patients, either at the time of ambulatory visits or during remote monitoring. CONCLUSION: Remote monitoring allowed the early and reliable detection of ICD leads failure without requiring any patient intervention. Oxford University Press 2010-09 2010-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2938466/ /pubmed/20591841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq203 Text en Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2010. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal, Learned Society and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Guédon-Moreau, Laurence Chevalier, Philippe Marquié, Christelle Kouakam, Claude Klug, Didier Lacroix, Dominique Brigadeau, Francois Kacet, Salem Contributions of remote monitoring to the follow-up of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator leads under advisory |
title | Contributions of remote monitoring to the follow-up of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator leads under advisory |
title_full | Contributions of remote monitoring to the follow-up of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator leads under advisory |
title_fullStr | Contributions of remote monitoring to the follow-up of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator leads under advisory |
title_full_unstemmed | Contributions of remote monitoring to the follow-up of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator leads under advisory |
title_short | Contributions of remote monitoring to the follow-up of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator leads under advisory |
title_sort | contributions of remote monitoring to the follow-up of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator leads under advisory |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2938466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20591841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guedonmoreaulaurence contributionsofremotemonitoringtothefollowupofimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorleadsunderadvisory AT chevalierphilippe contributionsofremotemonitoringtothefollowupofimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorleadsunderadvisory AT marquiechristelle contributionsofremotemonitoringtothefollowupofimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorleadsunderadvisory AT kouakamclaude contributionsofremotemonitoringtothefollowupofimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorleadsunderadvisory AT klugdidier contributionsofremotemonitoringtothefollowupofimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorleadsunderadvisory AT lacroixdominique contributionsofremotemonitoringtothefollowupofimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorleadsunderadvisory AT brigadeaufrancois contributionsofremotemonitoringtothefollowupofimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorleadsunderadvisory AT kacetsalem contributionsofremotemonitoringtothefollowupofimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorleadsunderadvisory |