Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of different doses and retreatment of rituximab: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in patients who are biological naïve with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate (Study Evaluating Rituximab's Efficacy in MTX iNadequate rEsponders (SERENE))

OBJECTIVES: This phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of rituximab plus methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to MTX and who were naïve to prior biological treatment. METHODS: Patients with active disease on stable MTX (10–25...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emery, P, Deodhar, A, Rigby, W F, Isaacs, J D, Combe, B, Racewicz, A J, Latinis, K, Abud-Mendoza, C, Szczepański, L J, Roschmann, R A, Chen, A, Armstrong, G K, Douglass, W, Tyrrell, H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2938895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20488885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.119933
_version_ 1782186684897558528
author Emery, P
Deodhar, A
Rigby, W F
Isaacs, J D
Combe, B
Racewicz, A J
Latinis, K
Abud-Mendoza, C
Szczepański, L J
Roschmann, R A
Chen, A
Armstrong, G K
Douglass, W
Tyrrell, H
author_facet Emery, P
Deodhar, A
Rigby, W F
Isaacs, J D
Combe, B
Racewicz, A J
Latinis, K
Abud-Mendoza, C
Szczepański, L J
Roschmann, R A
Chen, A
Armstrong, G K
Douglass, W
Tyrrell, H
author_sort Emery, P
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of rituximab plus methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to MTX and who were naïve to prior biological treatment. METHODS: Patients with active disease on stable MTX (10–25 mg/week) were randomised to rituximab 2×500 mg (n=168), rituximab 2×1000 mg (n=172), or placebo (n=172). From week 24, patients not in remission (Disease Activity Score (28 joints) ≥2.6) received a second course of rituximab; patients initially assigned to placebo switched to rituximab 2×500 mg. The primary end point was American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) response at week 24. All patients were followed until week 48. RESULTS: At week 24, both doses of rituximab showed statistically superior efficacy (p<0.0001) to placebo (ACR20: 54%, 51% and 23%; rituximab (2×500 mg) + MTX, rituximab (2×1000 mg) + MTX and placebo + MTX, respectively). Secondary end points were also significantly improved for both rituximab groups compared with placebo. Further improvements in both rituximab arms were observed from week 24 to week 48. Rituximab + MTX was well tolerated, demonstrating comparable safety to placebo + MTX through to week 24, and between rituximab doses through to week 48. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab (at 2×500 mg and 2×1000 mg) plus MTX significantly improved clinical outcomes at week 24, which were further improved by week 48. No significant differences in either clinical or safety outcomes were apparent between the rituximab doses.
format Text
id pubmed-2938895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29388952010-09-15 Efficacy and safety of different doses and retreatment of rituximab: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in patients who are biological naïve with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate (Study Evaluating Rituximab's Efficacy in MTX iNadequate rEsponders (SERENE)) Emery, P Deodhar, A Rigby, W F Isaacs, J D Combe, B Racewicz, A J Latinis, K Abud-Mendoza, C Szczepański, L J Roschmann, R A Chen, A Armstrong, G K Douglass, W Tyrrell, H Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and Epidemiological Research OBJECTIVES: This phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of rituximab plus methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to MTX and who were naïve to prior biological treatment. METHODS: Patients with active disease on stable MTX (10–25 mg/week) were randomised to rituximab 2×500 mg (n=168), rituximab 2×1000 mg (n=172), or placebo (n=172). From week 24, patients not in remission (Disease Activity Score (28 joints) ≥2.6) received a second course of rituximab; patients initially assigned to placebo switched to rituximab 2×500 mg. The primary end point was American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) response at week 24. All patients were followed until week 48. RESULTS: At week 24, both doses of rituximab showed statistically superior efficacy (p<0.0001) to placebo (ACR20: 54%, 51% and 23%; rituximab (2×500 mg) + MTX, rituximab (2×1000 mg) + MTX and placebo + MTX, respectively). Secondary end points were also significantly improved for both rituximab groups compared with placebo. Further improvements in both rituximab arms were observed from week 24 to week 48. Rituximab + MTX was well tolerated, demonstrating comparable safety to placebo + MTX through to week 24, and between rituximab doses through to week 48. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab (at 2×500 mg and 2×1000 mg) plus MTX significantly improved clinical outcomes at week 24, which were further improved by week 48. No significant differences in either clinical or safety outcomes were apparent between the rituximab doses. BMJ Group 2010-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2938895/ /pubmed/20488885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.119933 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Clinical and Epidemiological Research
Emery, P
Deodhar, A
Rigby, W F
Isaacs, J D
Combe, B
Racewicz, A J
Latinis, K
Abud-Mendoza, C
Szczepański, L J
Roschmann, R A
Chen, A
Armstrong, G K
Douglass, W
Tyrrell, H
Efficacy and safety of different doses and retreatment of rituximab: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in patients who are biological naïve with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate (Study Evaluating Rituximab's Efficacy in MTX iNadequate rEsponders (SERENE))
title Efficacy and safety of different doses and retreatment of rituximab: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in patients who are biological naïve with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate (Study Evaluating Rituximab's Efficacy in MTX iNadequate rEsponders (SERENE))
title_full Efficacy and safety of different doses and retreatment of rituximab: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in patients who are biological naïve with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate (Study Evaluating Rituximab's Efficacy in MTX iNadequate rEsponders (SERENE))
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of different doses and retreatment of rituximab: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in patients who are biological naïve with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate (Study Evaluating Rituximab's Efficacy in MTX iNadequate rEsponders (SERENE))
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of different doses and retreatment of rituximab: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in patients who are biological naïve with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate (Study Evaluating Rituximab's Efficacy in MTX iNadequate rEsponders (SERENE))
title_short Efficacy and safety of different doses and retreatment of rituximab: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in patients who are biological naïve with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate (Study Evaluating Rituximab's Efficacy in MTX iNadequate rEsponders (SERENE))
title_sort efficacy and safety of different doses and retreatment of rituximab: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in patients who are biological naïve with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate (study evaluating rituximab's efficacy in mtx inadequate responders (serene))
topic Clinical and Epidemiological Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2938895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20488885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.119933
work_keys_str_mv AT emeryp efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesandretreatmentofrituximabarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrialinpatientswhoarebiologicalnaivewithactiverheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexatestudyevaluatingrituximabsefficacyinmtxinadequaterespondersserene
AT deodhara efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesandretreatmentofrituximabarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrialinpatientswhoarebiologicalnaivewithactiverheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexatestudyevaluatingrituximabsefficacyinmtxinadequaterespondersserene
AT rigbywf efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesandretreatmentofrituximabarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrialinpatientswhoarebiologicalnaivewithactiverheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexatestudyevaluatingrituximabsefficacyinmtxinadequaterespondersserene
AT isaacsjd efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesandretreatmentofrituximabarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrialinpatientswhoarebiologicalnaivewithactiverheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexatestudyevaluatingrituximabsefficacyinmtxinadequaterespondersserene
AT combeb efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesandretreatmentofrituximabarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrialinpatientswhoarebiologicalnaivewithactiverheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexatestudyevaluatingrituximabsefficacyinmtxinadequaterespondersserene
AT racewiczaj efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesandretreatmentofrituximabarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrialinpatientswhoarebiologicalnaivewithactiverheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexatestudyevaluatingrituximabsefficacyinmtxinadequaterespondersserene
AT latinisk efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesandretreatmentofrituximabarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrialinpatientswhoarebiologicalnaivewithactiverheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexatestudyevaluatingrituximabsefficacyinmtxinadequaterespondersserene
AT abudmendozac efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesandretreatmentofrituximabarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrialinpatientswhoarebiologicalnaivewithactiverheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexatestudyevaluatingrituximabsefficacyinmtxinadequaterespondersserene
AT szczepanskilj efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesandretreatmentofrituximabarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrialinpatientswhoarebiologicalnaivewithactiverheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexatestudyevaluatingrituximabsefficacyinmtxinadequaterespondersserene
AT roschmannra efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesandretreatmentofrituximabarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrialinpatientswhoarebiologicalnaivewithactiverheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexatestudyevaluatingrituximabsefficacyinmtxinadequaterespondersserene
AT chena efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesandretreatmentofrituximabarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrialinpatientswhoarebiologicalnaivewithactiverheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexatestudyevaluatingrituximabsefficacyinmtxinadequaterespondersserene
AT armstronggk efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesandretreatmentofrituximabarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrialinpatientswhoarebiologicalnaivewithactiverheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexatestudyevaluatingrituximabsefficacyinmtxinadequaterespondersserene
AT douglassw efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesandretreatmentofrituximabarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrialinpatientswhoarebiologicalnaivewithactiverheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexatestudyevaluatingrituximabsefficacyinmtxinadequaterespondersserene
AT tyrrellh efficacyandsafetyofdifferentdosesandretreatmentofrituximabarandomisedplacebocontrolledtrialinpatientswhoarebiologicalnaivewithactiverheumatoidarthritisandaninadequateresponsetomethotrexatestudyevaluatingrituximabsefficacyinmtxinadequaterespondersserene