Cargando…
The timing of cranial radiation in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme
There are few and conflicting studies on the optimal timing of initial cranial radiation in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) but none of them have addressed this issue in the elderly population. We used the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare database to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2940582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20150386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nop004 |
_version_ | 1782186824643379200 |
---|---|
author | Lai, Rose Hershman, Dawn L. Doan, Tieu Neugut, Alfred I. |
author_facet | Lai, Rose Hershman, Dawn L. Doan, Tieu Neugut, Alfred I. |
author_sort | Lai, Rose |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are few and conflicting studies on the optimal timing of initial cranial radiation in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) but none of them have addressed this issue in the elderly population. We used the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare database to investigate whether the time interval from surgery to initiation of radiation is a significant prognostic factor for survival in subjects aged ≥65 years with newly diagnosed GBM. Cox modeling was used to assess the effect of waiting time on overall survival. We identified a total of 1,375 patients, 296 with biopsies and 1,079 with resections. The median time to the initiation of radiotherapy was 15 days post operation (interquartile range 12–21). In the univariate Cox analysis of those who had debulking surgeries, a waiting time of >22 days showed a significant inverse relationship with survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.82, 95% CI 0.70–0.97, p = 0.02), but after adjustment for confounders, it was not a statistically significant factor in the final Cox model (HR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.97–1.01, p = 0.14). Therefore, waiting time was not a significant prognostic factor for subjects with biopsies in both the univariate and multivariate analyses. Although effort should be made to initiate radiotherapy as soon as possible after surgical resection/biopsy, a brief delay similar to that experienced by our cohort does not have a significant impact on survival. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2940582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29405822011-02-01 The timing of cranial radiation in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme Lai, Rose Hershman, Dawn L. Doan, Tieu Neugut, Alfred I. Neuro Oncol Clinical Investigations There are few and conflicting studies on the optimal timing of initial cranial radiation in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) but none of them have addressed this issue in the elderly population. We used the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare database to investigate whether the time interval from surgery to initiation of radiation is a significant prognostic factor for survival in subjects aged ≥65 years with newly diagnosed GBM. Cox modeling was used to assess the effect of waiting time on overall survival. We identified a total of 1,375 patients, 296 with biopsies and 1,079 with resections. The median time to the initiation of radiotherapy was 15 days post operation (interquartile range 12–21). In the univariate Cox analysis of those who had debulking surgeries, a waiting time of >22 days showed a significant inverse relationship with survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.82, 95% CI 0.70–0.97, p = 0.02), but after adjustment for confounders, it was not a statistically significant factor in the final Cox model (HR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.97–1.01, p = 0.14). Therefore, waiting time was not a significant prognostic factor for subjects with biopsies in both the univariate and multivariate analyses. Although effort should be made to initiate radiotherapy as soon as possible after surgical resection/biopsy, a brief delay similar to that experienced by our cohort does not have a significant impact on survival. Oxford University Press 2010-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2940582/ /pubmed/20150386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nop004 Text en © The Author(s) 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigations Lai, Rose Hershman, Dawn L. Doan, Tieu Neugut, Alfred I. The timing of cranial radiation in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme |
title | The timing of cranial radiation in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme |
title_full | The timing of cranial radiation in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme |
title_fullStr | The timing of cranial radiation in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme |
title_full_unstemmed | The timing of cranial radiation in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme |
title_short | The timing of cranial radiation in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme |
title_sort | timing of cranial radiation in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme |
topic | Clinical Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2940582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20150386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nop004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lairose thetimingofcranialradiationinelderlypatientswithnewlydiagnosedglioblastomamultiforme AT hershmandawnl thetimingofcranialradiationinelderlypatientswithnewlydiagnosedglioblastomamultiforme AT doantieu thetimingofcranialradiationinelderlypatientswithnewlydiagnosedglioblastomamultiforme AT neugutalfredi thetimingofcranialradiationinelderlypatientswithnewlydiagnosedglioblastomamultiforme AT lairose timingofcranialradiationinelderlypatientswithnewlydiagnosedglioblastomamultiforme AT hershmandawnl timingofcranialradiationinelderlypatientswithnewlydiagnosedglioblastomamultiforme AT doantieu timingofcranialradiationinelderlypatientswithnewlydiagnosedglioblastomamultiforme AT neugutalfredi timingofcranialradiationinelderlypatientswithnewlydiagnosedglioblastomamultiforme |