Cargando…

IMPaCT Back study protocol. Implementation of subgrouping for targeted treatment systems for low back pain patients in primary care: a prospective population-based sequential comparison

BACKGROUND: Prognostic assessment tools to identify subgroups of patients at risk of persistent low back pain who may benefit from targeted treatments have been developed and validated in primary care. The IMPaCT Back study is investigating the effects of introducing and supporting a subgrouping for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foster, Nadine E, Mullis, Ricky, Young, Julie, Doyle, Carol, Lewis, Martyn, Whitehurst, David, Hay, Elaine M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2940850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20727177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-186
_version_ 1782186853771771904
author Foster, Nadine E
Mullis, Ricky
Young, Julie
Doyle, Carol
Lewis, Martyn
Whitehurst, David
Hay, Elaine M
author_facet Foster, Nadine E
Mullis, Ricky
Young, Julie
Doyle, Carol
Lewis, Martyn
Whitehurst, David
Hay, Elaine M
author_sort Foster, Nadine E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prognostic assessment tools to identify subgroups of patients at risk of persistent low back pain who may benefit from targeted treatments have been developed and validated in primary care. The IMPaCT Back study is investigating the effects of introducing and supporting a subgrouping for targeted treatment system in primary care. METHODS/DESIGN: A prospective, population-based, quality improvement study in one Primary Care Trust in England with a before and after design. Phases 1 and 3 collect data on current practice, attitudes and behaviour of health care practitioners, patients' outcomes and health care costs. Phase 2 introduces and supports the subgrouping for targeted treatment system, via a multi-component, quality improvement intervention that includes educational courses and outreach visits led by opinion leaders, audit/feedback, mentoring and organisational support to embed the subgrouping tools within IT and clinical management systems. We aim to recruit 1000 low back pain patients aged 18 years and over consulting 7 GP practices within one Primary Care Trust in England, UK. The study includes GPs in participating practices and physiotherapists in associated services. The primary objective is to determine the effect of the subgrouping for targeted treatment system on back pain related disability and catastrophising at 2 and 6 months, comparing data from phase 1 with phase 3. Key secondary objectives are to determine the impact on: a) GPs' and physiotherapists' attitudes and behaviour regarding low back pain; b) The process of care that patients receive; c) The cost-effectiveness and sustainability of the new clinical system. DISCUSSION: This paper details the rationale, design, methods, planned analysis and operational aspects of the IMPaCT Back study. We aim to determine whether the new subgrouping for targeted treatment system is implemented and sustained in primary care, and evaluate its impact on clinical decision-making, patient outcomes and costs. STUDY REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register ISRCTN55174281
format Text
id pubmed-2940850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29408502010-09-17 IMPaCT Back study protocol. Implementation of subgrouping for targeted treatment systems for low back pain patients in primary care: a prospective population-based sequential comparison Foster, Nadine E Mullis, Ricky Young, Julie Doyle, Carol Lewis, Martyn Whitehurst, David Hay, Elaine M BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Prognostic assessment tools to identify subgroups of patients at risk of persistent low back pain who may benefit from targeted treatments have been developed and validated in primary care. The IMPaCT Back study is investigating the effects of introducing and supporting a subgrouping for targeted treatment system in primary care. METHODS/DESIGN: A prospective, population-based, quality improvement study in one Primary Care Trust in England with a before and after design. Phases 1 and 3 collect data on current practice, attitudes and behaviour of health care practitioners, patients' outcomes and health care costs. Phase 2 introduces and supports the subgrouping for targeted treatment system, via a multi-component, quality improvement intervention that includes educational courses and outreach visits led by opinion leaders, audit/feedback, mentoring and organisational support to embed the subgrouping tools within IT and clinical management systems. We aim to recruit 1000 low back pain patients aged 18 years and over consulting 7 GP practices within one Primary Care Trust in England, UK. The study includes GPs in participating practices and physiotherapists in associated services. The primary objective is to determine the effect of the subgrouping for targeted treatment system on back pain related disability and catastrophising at 2 and 6 months, comparing data from phase 1 with phase 3. Key secondary objectives are to determine the impact on: a) GPs' and physiotherapists' attitudes and behaviour regarding low back pain; b) The process of care that patients receive; c) The cost-effectiveness and sustainability of the new clinical system. DISCUSSION: This paper details the rationale, design, methods, planned analysis and operational aspects of the IMPaCT Back study. We aim to determine whether the new subgrouping for targeted treatment system is implemented and sustained in primary care, and evaluate its impact on clinical decision-making, patient outcomes and costs. STUDY REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register ISRCTN55174281 BioMed Central 2010-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2940850/ /pubmed/20727177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-186 Text en Copyright ©2010 Foster et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Foster, Nadine E
Mullis, Ricky
Young, Julie
Doyle, Carol
Lewis, Martyn
Whitehurst, David
Hay, Elaine M
IMPaCT Back study protocol. Implementation of subgrouping for targeted treatment systems for low back pain patients in primary care: a prospective population-based sequential comparison
title IMPaCT Back study protocol. Implementation of subgrouping for targeted treatment systems for low back pain patients in primary care: a prospective population-based sequential comparison
title_full IMPaCT Back study protocol. Implementation of subgrouping for targeted treatment systems for low back pain patients in primary care: a prospective population-based sequential comparison
title_fullStr IMPaCT Back study protocol. Implementation of subgrouping for targeted treatment systems for low back pain patients in primary care: a prospective population-based sequential comparison
title_full_unstemmed IMPaCT Back study protocol. Implementation of subgrouping for targeted treatment systems for low back pain patients in primary care: a prospective population-based sequential comparison
title_short IMPaCT Back study protocol. Implementation of subgrouping for targeted treatment systems for low back pain patients in primary care: a prospective population-based sequential comparison
title_sort impact back study protocol. implementation of subgrouping for targeted treatment systems for low back pain patients in primary care: a prospective population-based sequential comparison
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2940850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20727177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-186
work_keys_str_mv AT fosternadinee impactbackstudyprotocolimplementationofsubgroupingfortargetedtreatmentsystemsforlowbackpainpatientsinprimarycareaprospectivepopulationbasedsequentialcomparison
AT mullisricky impactbackstudyprotocolimplementationofsubgroupingfortargetedtreatmentsystemsforlowbackpainpatientsinprimarycareaprospectivepopulationbasedsequentialcomparison
AT youngjulie impactbackstudyprotocolimplementationofsubgroupingfortargetedtreatmentsystemsforlowbackpainpatientsinprimarycareaprospectivepopulationbasedsequentialcomparison
AT doylecarol impactbackstudyprotocolimplementationofsubgroupingfortargetedtreatmentsystemsforlowbackpainpatientsinprimarycareaprospectivepopulationbasedsequentialcomparison
AT lewismartyn impactbackstudyprotocolimplementationofsubgroupingfortargetedtreatmentsystemsforlowbackpainpatientsinprimarycareaprospectivepopulationbasedsequentialcomparison
AT whitehurstdavid impactbackstudyprotocolimplementationofsubgroupingfortargetedtreatmentsystemsforlowbackpainpatientsinprimarycareaprospectivepopulationbasedsequentialcomparison
AT hayelainem impactbackstudyprotocolimplementationofsubgroupingfortargetedtreatmentsystemsforlowbackpainpatientsinprimarycareaprospectivepopulationbasedsequentialcomparison