Cargando…

A Novel Surgical Technique: Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Conventional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a gold standard for bariatric surgery, but the procedure requires five to seven incisions for placement of multiple trocars and thus may produce less-than-ideal cosmetic results. We have developed a new approach, single-incision transumbi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Chih-Kun, Yao, Sheng-Fa, Lo, Chi-Hsien, Houng, Jer-Yiing, Chen, Yaw-Sen, Lee, Po-Huang
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2941085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20593246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0218-8
_version_ 1782186882763849728
author Huang, Chih-Kun
Yao, Sheng-Fa
Lo, Chi-Hsien
Houng, Jer-Yiing
Chen, Yaw-Sen
Lee, Po-Huang
author_facet Huang, Chih-Kun
Yao, Sheng-Fa
Lo, Chi-Hsien
Houng, Jer-Yiing
Chen, Yaw-Sen
Lee, Po-Huang
author_sort Huang, Chih-Kun
collection PubMed
description Conventional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a gold standard for bariatric surgery, but the procedure requires five to seven incisions for placement of multiple trocars and thus may produce less-than-ideal cosmetic results. We have developed a new approach, single-incision transumbilical LRYGB (SITU-LRYGB) to treat morbid obesity. We compared the surgical results and patient satisfaction in a study of five-port LRYGB and SITU-LRYGB. Fifty morbidly obese patients (14 males, 36 females) underwent either Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with five-port LRYGB or the SITU-LRYGB approach. During the operation, we used a novel intraoperative liver traction method with a “liver suspension tape” that we specifically designed for SITU-LRYGB. Compared to five-port surgery with SITU-LRYGB, there were no intraoperative complications, wound healing was excellent, and there was no abdominal scarring. SITU surgical time was longer than that with five-port LRYGB (99.8 vs. 67.6 min, P < 0.001). Patients treated with the five-port method were more obese than those in the SITU group (127.9 vs. 112.4 kg, P = 0.016). After the bariatric surgery, no difference in comorbidity was found in both groups. Patient satisfaction was greater with SITU than with the five-port method (4.48 vs. 3.96, P = 0.006). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass can be successfully achieved via a single umbilical incision, a method that provides a short operative time and good recovery and eliminates abdominal scarring.
format Text
id pubmed-2941085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29410852010-10-07 A Novel Surgical Technique: Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Huang, Chih-Kun Yao, Sheng-Fa Lo, Chi-Hsien Houng, Jer-Yiing Chen, Yaw-Sen Lee, Po-Huang Obes Surg Clinical Research Conventional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a gold standard for bariatric surgery, but the procedure requires five to seven incisions for placement of multiple trocars and thus may produce less-than-ideal cosmetic results. We have developed a new approach, single-incision transumbilical LRYGB (SITU-LRYGB) to treat morbid obesity. We compared the surgical results and patient satisfaction in a study of five-port LRYGB and SITU-LRYGB. Fifty morbidly obese patients (14 males, 36 females) underwent either Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with five-port LRYGB or the SITU-LRYGB approach. During the operation, we used a novel intraoperative liver traction method with a “liver suspension tape” that we specifically designed for SITU-LRYGB. Compared to five-port surgery with SITU-LRYGB, there were no intraoperative complications, wound healing was excellent, and there was no abdominal scarring. SITU surgical time was longer than that with five-port LRYGB (99.8 vs. 67.6 min, P < 0.001). Patients treated with the five-port method were more obese than those in the SITU group (127.9 vs. 112.4 kg, P = 0.016). After the bariatric surgery, no difference in comorbidity was found in both groups. Patient satisfaction was greater with SITU than with the five-port method (4.48 vs. 3.96, P = 0.006). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass can be successfully achieved via a single umbilical incision, a method that provides a short operative time and good recovery and eliminates abdominal scarring. Springer-Verlag 2010-07-01 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2941085/ /pubmed/20593246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0218-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Huang, Chih-Kun
Yao, Sheng-Fa
Lo, Chi-Hsien
Houng, Jer-Yiing
Chen, Yaw-Sen
Lee, Po-Huang
A Novel Surgical Technique: Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
title A Novel Surgical Technique: Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
title_full A Novel Surgical Technique: Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
title_fullStr A Novel Surgical Technique: Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
title_full_unstemmed A Novel Surgical Technique: Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
title_short A Novel Surgical Technique: Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
title_sort novel surgical technique: single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2941085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20593246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0218-8
work_keys_str_mv AT huangchihkun anovelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass
AT yaoshengfa anovelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass
AT lochihsien anovelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass
AT houngjeryiing anovelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass
AT chenyawsen anovelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass
AT leepohuang anovelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass
AT huangchihkun novelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass
AT yaoshengfa novelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass
AT lochihsien novelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass
AT houngjeryiing novelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass
AT chenyawsen novelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass
AT leepohuang novelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass