Cargando…
A Novel Surgical Technique: Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
Conventional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a gold standard for bariatric surgery, but the procedure requires five to seven incisions for placement of multiple trocars and thus may produce less-than-ideal cosmetic results. We have developed a new approach, single-incision transumbi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2941085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20593246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0218-8 |
_version_ | 1782186882763849728 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Chih-Kun Yao, Sheng-Fa Lo, Chi-Hsien Houng, Jer-Yiing Chen, Yaw-Sen Lee, Po-Huang |
author_facet | Huang, Chih-Kun Yao, Sheng-Fa Lo, Chi-Hsien Houng, Jer-Yiing Chen, Yaw-Sen Lee, Po-Huang |
author_sort | Huang, Chih-Kun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Conventional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a gold standard for bariatric surgery, but the procedure requires five to seven incisions for placement of multiple trocars and thus may produce less-than-ideal cosmetic results. We have developed a new approach, single-incision transumbilical LRYGB (SITU-LRYGB) to treat morbid obesity. We compared the surgical results and patient satisfaction in a study of five-port LRYGB and SITU-LRYGB. Fifty morbidly obese patients (14 males, 36 females) underwent either Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with five-port LRYGB or the SITU-LRYGB approach. During the operation, we used a novel intraoperative liver traction method with a “liver suspension tape” that we specifically designed for SITU-LRYGB. Compared to five-port surgery with SITU-LRYGB, there were no intraoperative complications, wound healing was excellent, and there was no abdominal scarring. SITU surgical time was longer than that with five-port LRYGB (99.8 vs. 67.6 min, P < 0.001). Patients treated with the five-port method were more obese than those in the SITU group (127.9 vs. 112.4 kg, P = 0.016). After the bariatric surgery, no difference in comorbidity was found in both groups. Patient satisfaction was greater with SITU than with the five-port method (4.48 vs. 3.96, P = 0.006). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass can be successfully achieved via a single umbilical incision, a method that provides a short operative time and good recovery and eliminates abdominal scarring. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2941085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29410852010-10-07 A Novel Surgical Technique: Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Huang, Chih-Kun Yao, Sheng-Fa Lo, Chi-Hsien Houng, Jer-Yiing Chen, Yaw-Sen Lee, Po-Huang Obes Surg Clinical Research Conventional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a gold standard for bariatric surgery, but the procedure requires five to seven incisions for placement of multiple trocars and thus may produce less-than-ideal cosmetic results. We have developed a new approach, single-incision transumbilical LRYGB (SITU-LRYGB) to treat morbid obesity. We compared the surgical results and patient satisfaction in a study of five-port LRYGB and SITU-LRYGB. Fifty morbidly obese patients (14 males, 36 females) underwent either Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with five-port LRYGB or the SITU-LRYGB approach. During the operation, we used a novel intraoperative liver traction method with a “liver suspension tape” that we specifically designed for SITU-LRYGB. Compared to five-port surgery with SITU-LRYGB, there were no intraoperative complications, wound healing was excellent, and there was no abdominal scarring. SITU surgical time was longer than that with five-port LRYGB (99.8 vs. 67.6 min, P < 0.001). Patients treated with the five-port method were more obese than those in the SITU group (127.9 vs. 112.4 kg, P = 0.016). After the bariatric surgery, no difference in comorbidity was found in both groups. Patient satisfaction was greater with SITU than with the five-port method (4.48 vs. 3.96, P = 0.006). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass can be successfully achieved via a single umbilical incision, a method that provides a short operative time and good recovery and eliminates abdominal scarring. Springer-Verlag 2010-07-01 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2941085/ /pubmed/20593246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0218-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Huang, Chih-Kun Yao, Sheng-Fa Lo, Chi-Hsien Houng, Jer-Yiing Chen, Yaw-Sen Lee, Po-Huang A Novel Surgical Technique: Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass |
title | A Novel Surgical Technique: Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass |
title_full | A Novel Surgical Technique: Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass |
title_fullStr | A Novel Surgical Technique: Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass |
title_full_unstemmed | A Novel Surgical Technique: Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass |
title_short | A Novel Surgical Technique: Single-Incision Transumbilical Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass |
title_sort | novel surgical technique: single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2941085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20593246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0218-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangchihkun anovelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass AT yaoshengfa anovelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass AT lochihsien anovelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass AT houngjeryiing anovelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass AT chenyawsen anovelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass AT leepohuang anovelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass AT huangchihkun novelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass AT yaoshengfa novelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass AT lochihsien novelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass AT houngjeryiing novelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass AT chenyawsen novelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass AT leepohuang novelsurgicaltechniquesingleincisiontransumbilicallaparoscopicrouxenygastricbypass |