Cargando…
Comparison of vinorelbine with cisplatin in concomitant chemoradiotherapy in head and neck carcinoma
AIM: Head and neck cancer is one of the most commonly occurring malignancies in the world. In India, the most commonly occurring head and neck cancers are those of the oral cavity and the pharynx. The majority of these cancers present with stage III/IV disease. Surgery and radiation therapy are the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2941605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20931013 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.68845 |
_version_ | 1782186917164482560 |
---|---|
author | Devleena, Majumdar, Anup Poddar, Soumita Chakraborty, Anindya |
author_facet | Devleena, Majumdar, Anup Poddar, Soumita Chakraborty, Anindya |
author_sort | Devleena, |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Head and neck cancer is one of the most commonly occurring malignancies in the world. In India, the most commonly occurring head and neck cancers are those of the oral cavity and the pharynx. The majority of these cancers present with stage III/IV disease. Surgery and radiation therapy are the main treatment modalities. Concomitant chemoradiation is being investigated with the goal of improved local control that translates into improved survival. In this background, we have started this prospective randomized trial to ascertain the dose, schedule and sequence of therapy and to note whether Vinorelbine as radiosensitizer is equally effective as Cisplatin, comparing compliance, local control and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients of advanced head and neck cancer were randomized into two arms. Arm A received weekly injection Cisplatin 40mg/m(2) along with radiation. Arm B received weekly injection of Vinorelbine 6mg/m(2) along with radiation. Radiotherapy was delivered at a dose of 6,600-7,000 Gy in conventional fractionation in a telecobalt machine. RESULTS: The complete response (CR) rate was higher in arm B (90%) than in arm A (70%). Major toxicities included neutropenia, anemia, mucositis and nausea. CONCLUSION: Concomitant chemoradiation with Vinorelbine produced more CR than chemoradiation with Cisplatin in advanced head and neck cancer. Toxicities were more in the Cisplatin arm, but they were manageable. Although a majority of the study was performed using Cisplatin as the radiosensitizer, Vinorelbine can be recommended as radiosensitizer in advanced head and neck malignancy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2941605 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29416052010-10-07 Comparison of vinorelbine with cisplatin in concomitant chemoradiotherapy in head and neck carcinoma Devleena, Majumdar, Anup Poddar, Soumita Chakraborty, Anindya Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol Original Article AIM: Head and neck cancer is one of the most commonly occurring malignancies in the world. In India, the most commonly occurring head and neck cancers are those of the oral cavity and the pharynx. The majority of these cancers present with stage III/IV disease. Surgery and radiation therapy are the main treatment modalities. Concomitant chemoradiation is being investigated with the goal of improved local control that translates into improved survival. In this background, we have started this prospective randomized trial to ascertain the dose, schedule and sequence of therapy and to note whether Vinorelbine as radiosensitizer is equally effective as Cisplatin, comparing compliance, local control and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients of advanced head and neck cancer were randomized into two arms. Arm A received weekly injection Cisplatin 40mg/m(2) along with radiation. Arm B received weekly injection of Vinorelbine 6mg/m(2) along with radiation. Radiotherapy was delivered at a dose of 6,600-7,000 Gy in conventional fractionation in a telecobalt machine. RESULTS: The complete response (CR) rate was higher in arm B (90%) than in arm A (70%). Major toxicities included neutropenia, anemia, mucositis and nausea. CONCLUSION: Concomitant chemoradiation with Vinorelbine produced more CR than chemoradiation with Cisplatin in advanced head and neck cancer. Toxicities were more in the Cisplatin arm, but they were manageable. Although a majority of the study was performed using Cisplatin as the radiosensitizer, Vinorelbine can be recommended as radiosensitizer in advanced head and neck malignancy. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2941605/ /pubmed/20931013 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.68845 Text en © Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Devleena, Majumdar, Anup Poddar, Soumita Chakraborty, Anindya Comparison of vinorelbine with cisplatin in concomitant chemoradiotherapy in head and neck carcinoma |
title | Comparison of vinorelbine with cisplatin in concomitant chemoradiotherapy in head and neck carcinoma |
title_full | Comparison of vinorelbine with cisplatin in concomitant chemoradiotherapy in head and neck carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Comparison of vinorelbine with cisplatin in concomitant chemoradiotherapy in head and neck carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of vinorelbine with cisplatin in concomitant chemoradiotherapy in head and neck carcinoma |
title_short | Comparison of vinorelbine with cisplatin in concomitant chemoradiotherapy in head and neck carcinoma |
title_sort | comparison of vinorelbine with cisplatin in concomitant chemoradiotherapy in head and neck carcinoma |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2941605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20931013 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.68845 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devleena comparisonofvinorelbinewithcisplatininconcomitantchemoradiotherapyinheadandneckcarcinoma AT majumdaranup comparisonofvinorelbinewithcisplatininconcomitantchemoradiotherapyinheadandneckcarcinoma AT poddarsoumita comparisonofvinorelbinewithcisplatininconcomitantchemoradiotherapyinheadandneckcarcinoma AT chakrabortyanindya comparisonofvinorelbinewithcisplatininconcomitantchemoradiotherapyinheadandneckcarcinoma |