Cargando…
Role of Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer
High-risk localized prostate cancer traditionally includes patients with clinical T3 disease but also includes those with apparently localized disease but with adverse prognostic factors such as a Gleason score of 8 to 10, prostate-specific antigen of more than 20 ng/ml, or extensive disease on biop...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Urological Association
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2941806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20856642 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.9.589 |
_version_ | 1782186939648049152 |
---|---|
author | You, Dalsan Jeong, In Gab Kim, Choung-Soo |
author_facet | You, Dalsan Jeong, In Gab Kim, Choung-Soo |
author_sort | You, Dalsan |
collection | PubMed |
description | High-risk localized prostate cancer traditionally includes patients with clinical T3 disease but also includes those with apparently localized disease but with adverse prognostic factors such as a Gleason score of 8 to 10, prostate-specific antigen of more than 20 ng/ml, or extensive disease on biopsy. In the past, these patients were treated primarily with radiation therapy due to concerns that surgery was not likely to be curative and was associated with a high incidence of side-effects. In addition, the lack of randomized trials comparing curative treatments for high-risk prostate cancer makes treatment decisions in this patient population difficult. Several retrospective series have reported the long-term efficacy of radical prostatectomy monotherapy in a high-risk population, showing that the 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was more than 80% and the 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate was about 50%. In addition, comparisons of different treatment options by means of nonrandomized trials have shown improved outcomes with surgery compared with radiation therapy or observation. Thus, there is renewed interest in radical prostatectomy as the primary treatment for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Here, we reviewed the outcomes of radical prostatectomy, with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies, in high-risk patients and what is known about the choice and timing of adjuvant therapies. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2941806 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | The Korean Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29418062010-09-20 Role of Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer You, Dalsan Jeong, In Gab Kim, Choung-Soo Korean J Urol Review Article High-risk localized prostate cancer traditionally includes patients with clinical T3 disease but also includes those with apparently localized disease but with adverse prognostic factors such as a Gleason score of 8 to 10, prostate-specific antigen of more than 20 ng/ml, or extensive disease on biopsy. In the past, these patients were treated primarily with radiation therapy due to concerns that surgery was not likely to be curative and was associated with a high incidence of side-effects. In addition, the lack of randomized trials comparing curative treatments for high-risk prostate cancer makes treatment decisions in this patient population difficult. Several retrospective series have reported the long-term efficacy of radical prostatectomy monotherapy in a high-risk population, showing that the 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was more than 80% and the 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate was about 50%. In addition, comparisons of different treatment options by means of nonrandomized trials have shown improved outcomes with surgery compared with radiation therapy or observation. Thus, there is renewed interest in radical prostatectomy as the primary treatment for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Here, we reviewed the outcomes of radical prostatectomy, with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies, in high-risk patients and what is known about the choice and timing of adjuvant therapies. The Korean Urological Association 2010-09 2010-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2941806/ /pubmed/20856642 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.9.589 Text en Copyright © The Korean Urological Association, 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article You, Dalsan Jeong, In Gab Kim, Choung-Soo Role of Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer |
title | Role of Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer |
title_full | Role of Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer |
title_fullStr | Role of Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer |
title_short | Role of Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer |
title_sort | role of radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2941806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20856642 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.9.589 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT youdalsan roleofradicalprostatectomyforhighriskprostatecancer AT jeongingab roleofradicalprostatectomyforhighriskprostatecancer AT kimchoungsoo roleofradicalprostatectomyforhighriskprostatecancer |