Cargando…

Asymmetric and non-uniform evolution of recently duplicated human genes

BACKGROUND: Gene duplications are a source of new genes and protein functions. The innovative role of duplication events makes families of paralogous genes an interesting target for studies in evolutionary biology. Here we study global trends in the evolution of human genes that resulted from recent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panchin, Alexander Y, Gelfand, Mikhail S, Ramensky, Vasily E, Artamonova, Irena I
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2942815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20825637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-5-54
_version_ 1782186964582137856
author Panchin, Alexander Y
Gelfand, Mikhail S
Ramensky, Vasily E
Artamonova, Irena I
author_facet Panchin, Alexander Y
Gelfand, Mikhail S
Ramensky, Vasily E
Artamonova, Irena I
author_sort Panchin, Alexander Y
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gene duplications are a source of new genes and protein functions. The innovative role of duplication events makes families of paralogous genes an interesting target for studies in evolutionary biology. Here we study global trends in the evolution of human genes that resulted from recent duplications. RESULTS: The pressure of negative selection is weaker during a short time immediately after a duplication event. Roughly one fifth of genes in paralogous gene families are evolving asymmetrically: one of the proteins encoded by two closest paralogs accumulates amino acid substitutions significantly faster than its partner. This asymmetry cannot be explained by differences in gene expression levels. In asymmetric gene pairs the number of deleterious mutations is increased in one copy, while decreased in the other copy as compared to genes constituting non-asymmetrically evolving pairs. The asymmetry in the rate of synonymous substitutions is much weaker and not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The increase of negative selection pressure over time after a duplication event seems to be a major trend in the evolution of human paralogous gene families. The observed asymmetry in the evolution of paralogous genes shows that in many cases one of two gene copies remains practically unchanged, while the other accumulates functional mutations. This supports the hypothesis that slowly evolving gene copies preserve their original functions, while fast evolving copies obtain new specificities or functions. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Dr. Igor Rogozin (nominated by Dr. Arcady Mushegian), Dr. Fyodor Kondrashov, and Dr. Sergei Maslov.
format Text
id pubmed-2942815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29428152010-09-30 Asymmetric and non-uniform evolution of recently duplicated human genes Panchin, Alexander Y Gelfand, Mikhail S Ramensky, Vasily E Artamonova, Irena I Biol Direct Research BACKGROUND: Gene duplications are a source of new genes and protein functions. The innovative role of duplication events makes families of paralogous genes an interesting target for studies in evolutionary biology. Here we study global trends in the evolution of human genes that resulted from recent duplications. RESULTS: The pressure of negative selection is weaker during a short time immediately after a duplication event. Roughly one fifth of genes in paralogous gene families are evolving asymmetrically: one of the proteins encoded by two closest paralogs accumulates amino acid substitutions significantly faster than its partner. This asymmetry cannot be explained by differences in gene expression levels. In asymmetric gene pairs the number of deleterious mutations is increased in one copy, while decreased in the other copy as compared to genes constituting non-asymmetrically evolving pairs. The asymmetry in the rate of synonymous substitutions is much weaker and not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The increase of negative selection pressure over time after a duplication event seems to be a major trend in the evolution of human paralogous gene families. The observed asymmetry in the evolution of paralogous genes shows that in many cases one of two gene copies remains practically unchanged, while the other accumulates functional mutations. This supports the hypothesis that slowly evolving gene copies preserve their original functions, while fast evolving copies obtain new specificities or functions. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Dr. Igor Rogozin (nominated by Dr. Arcady Mushegian), Dr. Fyodor Kondrashov, and Dr. Sergei Maslov. BioMed Central 2010-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2942815/ /pubmed/20825637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-5-54 Text en Copyright ©2010 Panchin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Panchin, Alexander Y
Gelfand, Mikhail S
Ramensky, Vasily E
Artamonova, Irena I
Asymmetric and non-uniform evolution of recently duplicated human genes
title Asymmetric and non-uniform evolution of recently duplicated human genes
title_full Asymmetric and non-uniform evolution of recently duplicated human genes
title_fullStr Asymmetric and non-uniform evolution of recently duplicated human genes
title_full_unstemmed Asymmetric and non-uniform evolution of recently duplicated human genes
title_short Asymmetric and non-uniform evolution of recently duplicated human genes
title_sort asymmetric and non-uniform evolution of recently duplicated human genes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2942815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20825637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-5-54
work_keys_str_mv AT panchinalexandery asymmetricandnonuniformevolutionofrecentlyduplicatedhumangenes
AT gelfandmikhails asymmetricandnonuniformevolutionofrecentlyduplicatedhumangenes
AT ramenskyvasilye asymmetricandnonuniformevolutionofrecentlyduplicatedhumangenes
AT artamonovairenai asymmetricandnonuniformevolutionofrecentlyduplicatedhumangenes