Cargando…

Group Dynamics of Zebra and Wildebeest in a Woodland Savanna: Effects of Predation Risk and Habitat Density

BACKGROUND: Group dynamics of gregarious ungulates in the grasslands of the African savanna have been well studied, but the trade-offs that affect grouping of these ungulates in woodland habitats or dense vegetation are less well understood. We examined the landscape-level distribution of groups of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thaker, Maria, Vanak, Abi T., Owen, Cailey R., Ogden, Monika B., Slotow, Rob
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2942830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20862216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012758
_version_ 1782186968285708288
author Thaker, Maria
Vanak, Abi T.
Owen, Cailey R.
Ogden, Monika B.
Slotow, Rob
author_facet Thaker, Maria
Vanak, Abi T.
Owen, Cailey R.
Ogden, Monika B.
Slotow, Rob
author_sort Thaker, Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Group dynamics of gregarious ungulates in the grasslands of the African savanna have been well studied, but the trade-offs that affect grouping of these ungulates in woodland habitats or dense vegetation are less well understood. We examined the landscape-level distribution of groups of blue wildebeest, Connochaetes taurinus, and Burchell's zebra, Equus burchelli, in a predominantly woodland area (Karongwe Game Reserve, South Africa; KGR) to test the hypothesis that group dynamics are a function of minimizing predation risk from their primary predator, lion, Panthera leo. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using generalized linear models, we examined the relative importance of habitat type (differing in vegetation density), probability of encountering lion (based on utilization distribution of all individual lions in the reserve), and season in predicting group size and composition. We found that only in open scrub habitat, group size for both ungulate species increased with the probability of encountering lion. Group composition differed between the two species and was driven by habitat selection as well as predation risk. For both species, composition of groups was, however, dominated by males in open scrub habitats, irrespective of the probability of encountering lion. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Distribution patterns of wildebeest and zebra groups at the landscape level directly support the theoretical and empirical evidence from a range of taxa predicting that grouping is favored in open habitats and when predation risk is high. Group composition reflected species-specific social, physiological and foraging constraints, as well as the importance of predation risk. Avoidance of high resource open scrub habitat by females can lead to loss of foraging opportunities, which can be particularly costly in areas such as KGR, where this resource is limited. Thus, landscape-level grouping dynamics are species specific and particular to the composition of the group, arising from a tradeoff between maximizing resource selection and minimizing predation risk.
format Text
id pubmed-2942830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29428302010-09-22 Group Dynamics of Zebra and Wildebeest in a Woodland Savanna: Effects of Predation Risk and Habitat Density Thaker, Maria Vanak, Abi T. Owen, Cailey R. Ogden, Monika B. Slotow, Rob PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Group dynamics of gregarious ungulates in the grasslands of the African savanna have been well studied, but the trade-offs that affect grouping of these ungulates in woodland habitats or dense vegetation are less well understood. We examined the landscape-level distribution of groups of blue wildebeest, Connochaetes taurinus, and Burchell's zebra, Equus burchelli, in a predominantly woodland area (Karongwe Game Reserve, South Africa; KGR) to test the hypothesis that group dynamics are a function of minimizing predation risk from their primary predator, lion, Panthera leo. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using generalized linear models, we examined the relative importance of habitat type (differing in vegetation density), probability of encountering lion (based on utilization distribution of all individual lions in the reserve), and season in predicting group size and composition. We found that only in open scrub habitat, group size for both ungulate species increased with the probability of encountering lion. Group composition differed between the two species and was driven by habitat selection as well as predation risk. For both species, composition of groups was, however, dominated by males in open scrub habitats, irrespective of the probability of encountering lion. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Distribution patterns of wildebeest and zebra groups at the landscape level directly support the theoretical and empirical evidence from a range of taxa predicting that grouping is favored in open habitats and when predation risk is high. Group composition reflected species-specific social, physiological and foraging constraints, as well as the importance of predation risk. Avoidance of high resource open scrub habitat by females can lead to loss of foraging opportunities, which can be particularly costly in areas such as KGR, where this resource is limited. Thus, landscape-level grouping dynamics are species specific and particular to the composition of the group, arising from a tradeoff between maximizing resource selection and minimizing predation risk. Public Library of Science 2010-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2942830/ /pubmed/20862216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012758 Text en Thaker et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thaker, Maria
Vanak, Abi T.
Owen, Cailey R.
Ogden, Monika B.
Slotow, Rob
Group Dynamics of Zebra and Wildebeest in a Woodland Savanna: Effects of Predation Risk and Habitat Density
title Group Dynamics of Zebra and Wildebeest in a Woodland Savanna: Effects of Predation Risk and Habitat Density
title_full Group Dynamics of Zebra and Wildebeest in a Woodland Savanna: Effects of Predation Risk and Habitat Density
title_fullStr Group Dynamics of Zebra and Wildebeest in a Woodland Savanna: Effects of Predation Risk and Habitat Density
title_full_unstemmed Group Dynamics of Zebra and Wildebeest in a Woodland Savanna: Effects of Predation Risk and Habitat Density
title_short Group Dynamics of Zebra and Wildebeest in a Woodland Savanna: Effects of Predation Risk and Habitat Density
title_sort group dynamics of zebra and wildebeest in a woodland savanna: effects of predation risk and habitat density
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2942830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20862216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012758
work_keys_str_mv AT thakermaria groupdynamicsofzebraandwildebeestinawoodlandsavannaeffectsofpredationriskandhabitatdensity
AT vanakabit groupdynamicsofzebraandwildebeestinawoodlandsavannaeffectsofpredationriskandhabitatdensity
AT owencaileyr groupdynamicsofzebraandwildebeestinawoodlandsavannaeffectsofpredationriskandhabitatdensity
AT ogdenmonikab groupdynamicsofzebraandwildebeestinawoodlandsavannaeffectsofpredationriskandhabitatdensity
AT slotowrob groupdynamicsofzebraandwildebeestinawoodlandsavannaeffectsofpredationriskandhabitatdensity