Cargando…

Relations as patterns: bridging the gap between OBO and OWL

BACKGROUND: Most biomedical ontologies are represented in the OBO Flatfile Format, which is an easy-to-use graph-based ontology language. The semantics of the OBO Flatfile Format 1.2 enforces a strict predetermined interpretation of relationship statements between classes. It does not allow flexible...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoehndorf, Robert, Oellrich, Anika, Dumontier, Michel, Kelso, Janet, Rebholz-Schuhmann, Dietrich, Herre, Heinrich
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2942855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20807438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-441
_version_ 1782186973444702208
author Hoehndorf, Robert
Oellrich, Anika
Dumontier, Michel
Kelso, Janet
Rebholz-Schuhmann, Dietrich
Herre, Heinrich
author_facet Hoehndorf, Robert
Oellrich, Anika
Dumontier, Michel
Kelso, Janet
Rebholz-Schuhmann, Dietrich
Herre, Heinrich
author_sort Hoehndorf, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most biomedical ontologies are represented in the OBO Flatfile Format, which is an easy-to-use graph-based ontology language. The semantics of the OBO Flatfile Format 1.2 enforces a strict predetermined interpretation of relationship statements between classes. It does not allow flexible specifications that provide better approximations of the intuitive understanding of the considered relations. If relations cannot be accurately expressed then ontologies built upon them may contain false assertions and hence lead to false inferences. Ontologies in the OBO Foundry must formalize the semantics of relations according to the OBO Relationship Ontology (RO). Therefore, being able to accurately express the intended meaning of relations is of crucial importance. Since the Web Ontology Language (OWL) is an expressive language with a formal semantics, it is suitable to de ne the meaning of relations accurately. RESULTS: We developed a method to provide definition patterns for relations between classes using OWL and describe a novel implementation of the RO based on this method. We implemented our extension in software that converts ontologies in the OBO Flatfile Format to OWL, and also provide a prototype to extract relational patterns from OWL ontologies using automated reasoning. The conversion software is freely available at http://bioonto.de/obo2owl, and can be accessed via a web interface. CONCLUSIONS: Explicitly defining relations permits their use in reasoning software and leads to a more flexible and powerful way of representing biomedical ontologies. Using the extended langua0067e and semantics avoids several mistakes commonly made in formalizing biomedical ontologies, and can be used to automatically detect inconsistencies. The use of our method enables the use of graph-based ontologies in OWL, and makes complex OWL ontologies accessible in a graph-based form. Thereby, our method provides the means to gradually move the representation of biomedical ontologies into formal knowledge representation languages that incorporates an explicit semantics. Our method facilitates the use of OWL-based software in the back-end while ontology curators may continue to develop ontologies with an OBO-style front-end.
format Text
id pubmed-2942855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29428552010-10-01 Relations as patterns: bridging the gap between OBO and OWL Hoehndorf, Robert Oellrich, Anika Dumontier, Michel Kelso, Janet Rebholz-Schuhmann, Dietrich Herre, Heinrich BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Most biomedical ontologies are represented in the OBO Flatfile Format, which is an easy-to-use graph-based ontology language. The semantics of the OBO Flatfile Format 1.2 enforces a strict predetermined interpretation of relationship statements between classes. It does not allow flexible specifications that provide better approximations of the intuitive understanding of the considered relations. If relations cannot be accurately expressed then ontologies built upon them may contain false assertions and hence lead to false inferences. Ontologies in the OBO Foundry must formalize the semantics of relations according to the OBO Relationship Ontology (RO). Therefore, being able to accurately express the intended meaning of relations is of crucial importance. Since the Web Ontology Language (OWL) is an expressive language with a formal semantics, it is suitable to de ne the meaning of relations accurately. RESULTS: We developed a method to provide definition patterns for relations between classes using OWL and describe a novel implementation of the RO based on this method. We implemented our extension in software that converts ontologies in the OBO Flatfile Format to OWL, and also provide a prototype to extract relational patterns from OWL ontologies using automated reasoning. The conversion software is freely available at http://bioonto.de/obo2owl, and can be accessed via a web interface. CONCLUSIONS: Explicitly defining relations permits their use in reasoning software and leads to a more flexible and powerful way of representing biomedical ontologies. Using the extended langua0067e and semantics avoids several mistakes commonly made in formalizing biomedical ontologies, and can be used to automatically detect inconsistencies. The use of our method enables the use of graph-based ontologies in OWL, and makes complex OWL ontologies accessible in a graph-based form. Thereby, our method provides the means to gradually move the representation of biomedical ontologies into formal knowledge representation languages that incorporates an explicit semantics. Our method facilitates the use of OWL-based software in the back-end while ontology curators may continue to develop ontologies with an OBO-style front-end. BioMed Central 2010-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2942855/ /pubmed/20807438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-441 Text en Copyright ©2010 Hoehndorf et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Hoehndorf, Robert
Oellrich, Anika
Dumontier, Michel
Kelso, Janet
Rebholz-Schuhmann, Dietrich
Herre, Heinrich
Relations as patterns: bridging the gap between OBO and OWL
title Relations as patterns: bridging the gap between OBO and OWL
title_full Relations as patterns: bridging the gap between OBO and OWL
title_fullStr Relations as patterns: bridging the gap between OBO and OWL
title_full_unstemmed Relations as patterns: bridging the gap between OBO and OWL
title_short Relations as patterns: bridging the gap between OBO and OWL
title_sort relations as patterns: bridging the gap between obo and owl
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2942855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20807438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-441
work_keys_str_mv AT hoehndorfrobert relationsaspatternsbridgingthegapbetweenoboandowl
AT oellrichanika relationsaspatternsbridgingthegapbetweenoboandowl
AT dumontiermichel relationsaspatternsbridgingthegapbetweenoboandowl
AT kelsojanet relationsaspatternsbridgingthegapbetweenoboandowl
AT rebholzschuhmanndietrich relationsaspatternsbridgingthegapbetweenoboandowl
AT herreheinrich relationsaspatternsbridgingthegapbetweenoboandowl