Cargando…

Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) administered in the luteal phase remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of the administration of a single-dose of GnRH-a in the luteal phase on ICSI clinical outcomes. METHODS: The research st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliveira, João Batista A, Baruffi, Ricardo, Petersen, Cláudia G, Mauri, Ana L, Cavagna, Mario, Franco, José G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2942885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20825643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-107
_version_ 1782186977049706496
author Oliveira, João Batista A
Baruffi, Ricardo
Petersen, Cláudia G
Mauri, Ana L
Cavagna, Mario
Franco, José G
author_facet Oliveira, João Batista A
Baruffi, Ricardo
Petersen, Cláudia G
Mauri, Ana L
Cavagna, Mario
Franco, José G
author_sort Oliveira, João Batista A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) administered in the luteal phase remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of the administration of a single-dose of GnRH-a in the luteal phase on ICSI clinical outcomes. METHODS: The research strategy included the online search of databases. Only randomized studies were included. The outcomes analyzed were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per transfer and ongoing pregnancy rate. The fixed effects model was used for odds ratio. In all trials, a single dose of GnRH-a was administered at day 5/6 after ICSI procedures. RESULTS: All cycles presented statistically significantly higher rates of implantation (P < 0.0001), CPR per transfer (P = 0.006) and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.02) in the group that received luteal-phase GnRH-a administration than in the control group (without luteal-phase-GnRH-a administration). When meta-analysis was carried out only in trials that had used long GnRH-a ovarian stimulation protocol, CPR per transfer (P = 0.06) and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.23) rates were not significantly different between the groups, but implantation rate was significant higher (P = 0.02) in the group that received luteal-phase-GnRH-a administration. On the other hand, the results from trials that had used GnRH antagonist multi-dose ovarian stimulation protocol showed statistically significantly higher implantation (P = 0.0002), CPR per transfer (P = 0.04) and ongoing pregnancy rate (P = 0.04) in the luteal-phase-GnRH-a administration group. The majority of the results presented heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that the luteal-phase single-dose GnRH-a administration can increase implantation rate in all cycles and CPR per transfer and ongoing pregnancy rate in cycles with GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol. Nevertheless, by considering the heterogeneity between the trials, it seems premature to recommend the use of GnRH-a in the luteal phase. Additional randomized controlled trials are necessary before evidence-based recommendations can be provided.
format Text
id pubmed-2942885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29428852010-09-21 Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis Oliveira, João Batista A Baruffi, Ricardo Petersen, Cláudia G Mauri, Ana L Cavagna, Mario Franco, José G Reprod Biol Endocrinol Review BACKGROUND: The effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) administered in the luteal phase remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of the administration of a single-dose of GnRH-a in the luteal phase on ICSI clinical outcomes. METHODS: The research strategy included the online search of databases. Only randomized studies were included. The outcomes analyzed were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per transfer and ongoing pregnancy rate. The fixed effects model was used for odds ratio. In all trials, a single dose of GnRH-a was administered at day 5/6 after ICSI procedures. RESULTS: All cycles presented statistically significantly higher rates of implantation (P < 0.0001), CPR per transfer (P = 0.006) and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.02) in the group that received luteal-phase GnRH-a administration than in the control group (without luteal-phase-GnRH-a administration). When meta-analysis was carried out only in trials that had used long GnRH-a ovarian stimulation protocol, CPR per transfer (P = 0.06) and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.23) rates were not significantly different between the groups, but implantation rate was significant higher (P = 0.02) in the group that received luteal-phase-GnRH-a administration. On the other hand, the results from trials that had used GnRH antagonist multi-dose ovarian stimulation protocol showed statistically significantly higher implantation (P = 0.0002), CPR per transfer (P = 0.04) and ongoing pregnancy rate (P = 0.04) in the luteal-phase-GnRH-a administration group. The majority of the results presented heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that the luteal-phase single-dose GnRH-a administration can increase implantation rate in all cycles and CPR per transfer and ongoing pregnancy rate in cycles with GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol. Nevertheless, by considering the heterogeneity between the trials, it seems premature to recommend the use of GnRH-a in the luteal phase. Additional randomized controlled trials are necessary before evidence-based recommendations can be provided. BioMed Central 2010-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2942885/ /pubmed/20825643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-107 Text en Copyright ©2010 Oliveira et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Oliveira, João Batista A
Baruffi, Ricardo
Petersen, Cláudia G
Mauri, Ana L
Cavagna, Mario
Franco, José G
Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis
title Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis
title_full Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis
title_short Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis
title_sort administration of single-dose gnrh agonist in the luteal phase in icsi cycles: a meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2942885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20825643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-107
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveirajoaobatistaa administrationofsingledosegnrhagonistinthelutealphaseinicsicyclesametaanalysis
AT baruffiricardo administrationofsingledosegnrhagonistinthelutealphaseinicsicyclesametaanalysis
AT petersenclaudiag administrationofsingledosegnrhagonistinthelutealphaseinicsicyclesametaanalysis
AT maurianal administrationofsingledosegnrhagonistinthelutealphaseinicsicyclesametaanalysis
AT cavagnamario administrationofsingledosegnrhagonistinthelutealphaseinicsicyclesametaanalysis
AT francojoseg administrationofsingledosegnrhagonistinthelutealphaseinicsicyclesametaanalysis