Cargando…
Excluding pulmonary embolism in primary care using the Wells-rule in combination with a point-of care D-dimer test: a scenario analysis
BACKGROUND: In secondary care the Wells clinical decision rule (CDR) combined with a quantitative D-dimer test can exclude pulmonary embolism (PE) safely. The introduction of point-of-care (POC) D-dimer tests facilitates a similar diagnostic strategy in primary care. We estimated failure-rate and ef...
Autores principales: | Lucassen, Wim AM, Douma, Renée A, Toll, Diane B, Büller, Harry R, van Weert, Henk CPM |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20831834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-64 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism using the Wells rule and qualitative D-dimer testing in primary care: prospective cohort study
por: Geersing, Geert-Jan, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Experiences with screening for atrial fibrillation: a qualitative study in general practice
por: Uittenbogaart, Steven B, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Validation of the YEARS algorithm and Wells' score with the age-adjusted cut-off to exclude pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients
por: Speksnijder, Esther M., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Diagnostic prediction models for suspected pulmonary embolism: systematic review and independent external validation in primary care
por: Hendriksen, Janneke M T, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
14-day Holter monitoring for atrial fibrillation after ischemic stroke: The yield of guideline-recommended monitoring duration
por: Himmelreich, Jelle CL, et al.
Publicado: (2022)